IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i6p90-d1405170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Determinants of Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions: Evidence from South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Floyd Khoza

    (School of Development Studies, Mbombela Campus, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela 1200, South Africa)

  • Daniel Makina

    (Department of Finance, Risk Management and Banking, Muckleneuk Campus, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Patricia Lindelwa Makoni

    (Department of Finance, Risk Management and Banking, Muckleneuk Campus, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the key determinants of corporate governance in selected financial institutions. Using South African financial institutions as a unit of analysis, namely insurance companies and banks, the study employed a panel generalised method of moments (GMM) model using a data set for the period from 2007 to 2020, to assess key determinants of corporate governance proxies identified for the study. The study sampled 21 South African financial institutions composed of Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) listed and unlisted banks and insurance companies. To measure corporate governance, the study developed a composite index employing the principal components analysis (PCA) method. The findings revealed a positive and significant association between the corporate governance index and its lagged variables. Furthermore, a significant and positive link was found between the efficiency ratio and corporate governance index and capital adequacy ratio (CAR); corporate governance index and firm size; corporate governance index and leverage ratio (LEV); and corporate governance index and return on assets (ROA). However, a negative and significant correlation was found between financial stability and the corporate governance index. The link between return on equity (ROE) and corporate governance was insignificant. A small cohort of financial institutions was excluded because it was challenging to obtain complete annual reports to extract the required data. The study was limited to only five corporate governance measures, namely board diversity, board size, board composition (independent non-executive directors and non-executive directors), and board remuneration. The findings are anticipated to persuade developing countries to pay special attention to how corporate governance is measured.

Suggested Citation

  • Floyd Khoza & Daniel Makina & Patricia Lindelwa Makoni, 2024. "Key Determinants of Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions: Evidence from South Africa," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:90-:d:1405170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/6/90/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/6/90/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Mwanzia Mulili & Dr. Peter Wong, 2011. "Corporate Governance Practices in Developing Countries: The Case for Kenya," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(1), pages 14-27, February.
    2. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    3. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone & Phillip H. Phan, 2012. "Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 885-913, August.
    4. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    5. Keyur Thaker & Vincent Charles & Abhay Pant & Tatiana Gherman, 2022. "A DEA and random forest regression approach to studying bank efficiency and corporate governance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(6), pages 1258-1277, June.
    6. Salim, Ruhul & Arjomandi, Amir & Seufert, Juergen Heinz, 2016. "Does corporate governance affect Australian banks' performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 113-125.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Florek & Ryszard Staniszewski & Dorota Czerwińska-Kayzer & Dariusz Kayzer, 2024. "Functioning of the Energy Sector Under Crisis Conditions—A Polish Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.
    2. Rania Béji & Ouidad Yousfi & Abdelwahed Omri, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach," Post-Print hal-03144756, HAL.
    3. Muhammad Kaleem Khan & R. M. Ammar Zahid & Adil Saleem & Judit Sági, 2021. "Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Peter Kwarteng & Kingsley Opoku Appiah & Bismark Addai, 2023. "Influence of board mechanisms on sustainability performance for listed firms in Sub-Saharan Africa," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Rania B'eji & Ouidad Yousfi & Abdelwahed Omri, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach," Papers 2102.09218, arXiv.org.
    6. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    7. Rubén Chavarín, 2020. "Risk governance, banks affiliated to business groups, and foreign ownership," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, March.
    8. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    9. Ahmed Alyahya & Gomaa Agag, 2025. "Improving Corporate Environmental Performance Through Big Data Analytics Implementation: The Role of Industry Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Guo, Guangyu & Lin, Ouwen & Li, Yan & Ruan, Jiyang, 2024. "Corporate carbon emission governance: The mediating role of financial leverage," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    11. Nurlan Orazalin, 2020. "Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 140-153, January.
    12. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    13. Jing Yan, 2025. "Internationalization, Corporate Governance, and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Veeravel, V & Murugesan, Vijaya Prabhagar & Narayanamurthy, Vijayakumar, 2024. "Does ESG disclosure really influence the firm performance? Evidence from India," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 193-202.
    15. Bolourian, Soudabeh & Alinaghian, Leila & Angus, Andrew, 2023. "Exploring the role of board-level corporate social responsibility committees in corporate social responsibility performance: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Muhammad Nadeem, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Supplemental Environmental Projects: A Restorative Justice Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 261-280, October.
    17. Nariman Kandil & Mohamed A. K. Basuony & Mohammed Bouaddi & Hanan Elmoursy & Ahmed F. Elbayuomi, 2025. "Examining CEO Characteristics and Carbon Emissions: A Quantile Approach to UK-Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Marco Minciullo & Maria Cristina Zaccone & Matteo Pedrini, 2022. "The Antecedents of Corporate Sustainability Performance: A Study on Generic and Sustainability-Related Corporate Governance Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Zhongtian Li & Jing Jia & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2022. "The corporate sustainability committee and its relation to corporate environmental performance," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 1292-1324, July.
    20. Peter Kwarteng & Kingsley Opoku Appiah & Joseph Akadeagre Agana & Newman Amaning, 2024. "Effect of corporate governance mechanisms on corporate strategy for listed firms in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(6), pages 1-39, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:90-:d:1405170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.