IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i5p535-d510076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of the Oriented Fuzzy Numbers in Credit Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Wójcicka-Wójtowicz

    (Department of Operations Research and Mathematical Economics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Piasecki

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, WSB University in Poznań, 61-895 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Over the years, banks have faced many difficulties, related mainly to lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties. The goal of credit risk management is to maintain the volume of credit risk at acceptable level as it is a vital feature in risk management. Credit analysts take into consideration factors of a wider spectrum, e.g., the prospects of the line of business, the experience of board members, credibility of suppliers, etc. Those factors are often considered on the linguistic scale, which includes such imprecise and inaccurate phrases, for instance, such as: more/less experienced, better/worse prospects, etc., which, for the experts and decision makers, are justified and result from their personal experience, preferences and human nature. The paper presents the approach of supporting methods in the credit risk decision-making process. It presents evaluation scales of imprecise phrases commonly used during the process of credit risk assessment based on experts’ preferences. Due to the imprecision, the oriented fuzzy numbers are a useful tool. For such described evaluation scales, we use a scoring function determined with the use of an adapted Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Wójcicka-Wójtowicz & Krzysztof Piasecki, 2021. "Application of the Oriented Fuzzy Numbers in Credit Risk Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:5:p:535-:d:510076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/5/535/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/5/535/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dubois, Didier & Prade, Henri, 1989. "Fuzzy sets, probability and measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 135-154, May.
    2. Aleksandra Wójcicka-Wójtowicz & Anna Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak & Krzysztof Piasecki, 2020. "Application of the SAW Method in Credit Risk Assessment," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Krzysztof Jajuga & Hermann Locarek-Junge & Lucjan T. Orlowski & Karsten Staehr (ed.), Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance, pages 189-205, Springer.
    3. Krzysztof Jajuga & Hermann Locarek-Junge & Lucjan T. Orlowski & Karsten Staehr (ed.), 2020. "Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-43078-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak & Aleksandra Wójcicka-Wójtowicz, 2023. "On portfolio analysis using oriented fuzzy numbers for the trade-related sector of the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(4), pages 155-170.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Rutkowska-Ziarko & Lesław Markowski, 2022. "Accounting and Market Risk Measures of Polish Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Jakša Krišto & Antti Talonen & Hrvoje Pauković, 2021. "Analysis of community‐owned mutual insurers' prospects of development in CEE countries: Outlining research agenda," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(3), pages 243-261, September.
    3. Smimou, K. & Bector, C.R. & Jacoby, G., 2008. "Portfolio selection subject to experts' judgments," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1036-1054, December.
    4. Klender Cortez & Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García & Samuel Mongrut, 2020. "Exchange Market Liquidity Prediction with the K-Nearest Neighbor Approach: Crypto vs. Fiat Currencies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Miller, W. A. & Leung, L. C. & Azhar, T. M. & Sargent, S., 1997. "Fuzzy production planning model for fresh tomato packing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 227-238, December.
    6. Helton, Jon C. & Johnson, Jay D., 2011. "Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1034-1052.
    7. Ragona, Maddalena & Mazzocchi, Mario & Rose, Martin, 2012. "Regulatory impact assessment of food safety policies: A preliminary study on alternative EU interventions on dioxins," 86th Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2012, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 135093, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Luiz Gomes & Maria Machado & Luis Rangel, 2013. "Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: the TODIM method with criteria interactions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 531-548, December.
    9. Krcmar, Emina & Stennes, Brad & Cornelis van Kooten, G. & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2001. "Carbon sequestration and land management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 616-629, December.
    10. Kreye, M.E. & Goh, Y.M. & Newnes, L.B. & Goodwin, P., 2012. "Approaches to displaying information to assist decisions under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 682-692.
    11. Ivanenko, Victor & Pasichnichenko, Illia, 2017. "Expected utility for nonstochastic risk," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 18-22.
    12. Munda, G. & Nijkamp, P. & Rietveld, P., 1995. "Qualitative multicriteria methods for fuzzy evaluation problems: An illustration of economic-ecological evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 79-97, April.
    13. Mazzocchi, Mario & Ragona, Maddalena & Zanoli, Agostina, 2013. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the ex-ante impact assessment of food safety policies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 177-189.
    14. Aven, T., 2011. "Interpretations of alternative uncertainty representations in a reliability and risk analysis context," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 353-360.
    15. Ivanenko, Victor & Pasichnichenko, Illia, 2016. "Expected utility for nonstochastic risk," MPRA Paper 70433, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Pan, Xing & Zuo, Dujun & Zhang, Wenjin & Hu, Lunhu & Wang, Huixiong & Jiang, Jing, 2021. "Research on Human Error Risk Evaluation Using Extended Bayesian Networks with Hybrid Data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    17. Krzysztof Piasecki & Anna Łyczkowska-Hanćkowiak, 2021. "Oriented Fuzzy Numbers vs. Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Marek Szturo & Bogdan Włodarczyk & Ireneusz Miciuła & Karolina Szturo, 2021. "The Essence of Relationships between the Crude Oil Market and Foreign Currencies Market Based on a Study of Key Currencies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Zimmermann, H. -J., 2000. "An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 190-198, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:5:p:535-:d:510076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.