IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i2p277-d322515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relevant Aspects for an EF3-Evaluation of E-Cognocracy

Author

Listed:
  • José María Moreno-Jiménez

    (Grupo Decisión Multicriterio Zaragoza (GDMZ), Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50005 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Cristina Pérez-Espés

    (HARMONIA-UAM Research Group, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Pilar Rivera-Torres

    (CREVALOR Research Group, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50005 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

The search for an appropriate response to the new challenges and needs posed by the Knowledge Society in the area of public decisions has led to the development of a number of participation models whose value must be assessed and analysed in an integral manner. Using a theoretical model based on structural equations, the present work identifies the relevant factors for an EF3-approach to the democracy model named e-Cognocracy: it comprises a conjoint evaluation of its effectiveness (doing what is right), efficacy (achieving goals) and efficiency (doing things correctly). The model was applied to a real-life e-Cognocracy experience undertaken in the municipality of Cadrete, Zaragoza. The evaluation resulted in the extraction and identification of a series of relationships that allow the advancement of an EF3-participation acceptance model, in line with the TAM model of Davis and the work of Delone and MacLean, which can be used for the integral evaluation of any e-participation model.

Suggested Citation

  • José María Moreno-Jiménez & Cristina Pérez-Espés & Pilar Rivera-Torres, 2020. "Relevant Aspects for an EF3-Evaluation of E-Cognocracy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:277-:d:322515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/2/277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/2/277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sartori, Anne E., 2003. "An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 111-138, April.
    2. Moreno-Jiménez, José María & Polasek, Wolfgang, 2003. "E-Democracy and Knowledge. A Multicriteria Framework for the New Democratic Era," Economics Series 142, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    3. GARCÍA LIZANA, Antonio & MORENO-JIMENEZ, José María, 2008. "Economía y democracia en la sociedad del conocimiento," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 26, pages 181-212, Agosto.
    4. Ank Michels & Laurens De Graaf, 2017. "Examining citizen participation: local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 875-881, November.
    5. Moreno-Jiménez, José Maria & Polasek, Wolfgang, 2005. "E-Cognocracy and the Participation of Immigrants in E-Governance," Economics Series 169, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    6. E. Burton Swanson, 1974. "Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 178-188, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Amirhosein Mardani & Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali & Gholam Ali Montazer, 2024. "A blockchain-powered e-cognocracy model for democratic decision making," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 209-246, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Salvador & Alfredo Altuzarra & Pilar Gargallo & José María Moreno-Jiménez, 2015. "A Bayesian Approach to Maximising Inner Compatibility in AHP-Systemic Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 655-673, July.
    2. Michael Ziegelmeyer & Julius Nick, 2013. "Backing out of private pension provision: lessons from Germany," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 40(3), pages 505-539, August.
    3. Kimberly Jones, 2023. "Community Engagement in Local Communities: Hearing the Voices of the Public," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(32), October.
    4. Patrick Hamm & David Stuckler & Lawrence King, 2006. "Mass Privatization and the Postcommunist Mortality Crisis," Working Papers wp118, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    5. Ali Fakih & Pascal L. Ghazalian, 2013. "Female Labour Force Participation in MENA's Manufacturing Sector: The Implications of Firm-related and National Factors," CIRANO Working Papers 2013s-46, CIRANO.
    6. Dong Chen & David Waterman, 2007. "Vertical Ownership, Program Network Carriage, and Tier Positioning in Cable Television: An Empirical Study," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 30(3), pages 227-251, May.
    7. John M. de Figueiredo & Brian Kelleher Richter, 2013. "Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying," NBER Working Papers 19698, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Thibaut, Erik & Vos, Steven & Scheerder, Jeroen, 2014. "Hurdles for sports consumption? The determining factors of household sports expenditures," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 444-454.
    9. Edo Anthony, 2015. "The Impact of Immigration on Native Wages and Employment," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 1151-1196, July.
    10. Peter Frase & Janet Gornick, 2009. "The Time Divide in Cross-National Perspective: The Work Week, Gender and Education in 17 Countries," LIS Working papers 526, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    11. Brown, Sarah & Hole, Arne Risa & Kilic, Dilek, 2014. "Out-of-pocket health care expenditure in Turkey: Analysis of the 2003–2008 Household Budget Surveys," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 211-218.
    12. Sun, Dingqiang & Bai, Junfei & Qiu, Huanguang & Cai, Yaqing, 2014. "Impact of government subsidies on household biogas use in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 748-756.
    13. Gelderman, M., 1995. "Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Thomas Barnay & Sandrine Juin, 2014. "Does care to dependent elderly people living at home increase their mental health?," TEPP Working Paper 2014-06, TEPP.
    15. Bernauer, Thomas & Spilker, Gabriele, 2010. "Escalation dynamics in WTO disputes over environment, health and safety issues," Papers 89, World Trade Institute.
    16. Ehrmann, Michael & Ziegelmeyer, Michael, 2014. "Household Risk Management and Actual Mortgage Choice in the Euro Area," MEA discussion paper series 201406, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    17. Morrison Kevin M, 2011. "As the World Bank Turns: Determinants of IDA Lending in the Cold War and After," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, August.
    18. Francois Collet & Déborah Philippe, 2014. "From Hot Cakes to Cold Feet: A Contingent Perspective on the Relationship between Market Uncertainty and Status Homophily in the Formation of Alliances," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 406-432, May.
    19. Matthew Hauenstein, 2020. "The conditional effect of audiences on credibility," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(3), pages 422-436, May.
    20. Anna Kopec & Alison Smith, 2024. "Lived Expertise in Homelessness Policy and Governance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:277-:d:322515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.