IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i6p904-d1607946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Mechanism of Social Emotion Formation in Public Emergencies Based on the DeGroot Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohan Yan

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China)

  • Yi Liu

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China)

  • Tiezhong Liu

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China)

  • Yan Chen

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, 5 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100080, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the frequent occurrence of public emergencies has often triggered the rapid spread and amplification of social emotions. The accumulation and intensification of negative emotions can lead to collective behaviors and even pose a threat to social stability. To better understand the formation and evolution of social emotions in such contexts, this study constructs a theoretical framework and simulation approach that combines opinion dynamics with emotional and trust interactions. First, we propose a clustering method that incorporates emotional similarity and trust relationships among users to delineate group structures involved in social emotion formation. Second, a dynamic trust adjustment mechanism is also proposed to capture how trust evolves as individuals interact emotionally. Third, a large-scale group emotional consensus decision-making approach, based on the DeGroot model, is developed to simulate how emotional exchanges and resonance drive groups toward consensus in public emergencies. Additionally, we present a strategy for guiding emotional interactions to reach a desired consensus that ensures minimal modifications to collective preference values while achieving an acceptable consensus level, helping to manage emotional escalation. To validate the proposed model, we conduct simulations using the “Fat Cat” incident as a case study. The results reveal key mechanisms underlying social emotion formation during public emergencies and highlight critical influencing factors, including user participation, opinion leader influence, and trust relationships. This study provides a clear understanding of how social emotions are generated and offers practical insights for managing emotional dynamics and improving group decision-making during crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohan Yan & Yi Liu & Tiezhong Liu & Yan Chen, 2025. "Research on the Mechanism of Social Emotion Formation in Public Emergencies Based on the DeGroot Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:904-:d:1607946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Józef Sznajd, 2000. "Opinion Evolution In Closed Community," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(06), pages 1157-1165.
    2. Nofsinger, John R., 2007. "Social mood: The stock market and political cycles," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 734-744, October.
    3. Hyekyung Woo & Youngtae Cho & Eunyoung Shim & Kihwang Lee & Gilyoung Song, 2015. "Public Trauma after the Sewol Ferry Disaster: The Role of Social Media in Understanding the Public Mood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2019. "A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1017-1027.
    5. Xiaoyang Ni & Haojie Zhou & Weiming Chen, 2020. "Addition of an Emotionally Stable Node in the SOSa-SPSa Model for Group Emotional Contagion of Panic in Public Health Emergency: Implications for Epidemic Emergency Responses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Zhifeng Liu & Tingting Zhang & Qiujun Lan, 2014. "An Extended SISa Model for Sentiment Contagion," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-7, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaye-Blake, William & Li, Frank Y. & Martin, A. McLeish & McDermott, Alan & Neil, Hayley & Rains, Scott, 2009. "A review of Multi-Agent Simulation Models in Agriculture," 2009 Conference, August 27-28, 2009, Nelson, New Zealand 97165, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Lu, Xi & Mo, Hongming & Deng, Yong, 2015. "An evidential opinion dynamics model based on heterogeneous social influential power," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 98-107.
    3. Célestin Coquidé & José Lages & Dima Shepelyansky, 2024. "Opinion Formation in the World Trade Network," Post-Print hal-04461784, HAL.
    4. Xiaolan Qian & Wenchen Han & Junzhong Yang, 2024. "From the DeGroot Model to the DeGroot-Non-Consensus Model: The Jump States and the Frozen Fragment States," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Dimitris Tsintsaris & Milan Tsompanoglou & Evangelos Ioannidis, 2024. "Dynamics of Social Influence and Knowledge in Networks: Sociophysics Models and Applications in Social Trading, Behavioral Finance and Business," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Zhao, Meng & Xu, Chang & Zhao, Wenxian & Lin, Mingwei, 2023. "New energy vehicle online selection method considering attribute compensation relationship and aspiration strength," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Hang-Hyun Jo & Jeoung-Yoo Kim, 2012. "Competitive Targeted Marketing," ISER Discussion Paper 0834, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    8. Gong, Zaiwu & Guo, Weiwei & Słowiński, Roman, 2021. "Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Ricardo Almeida & Agnieszka B. Malinowska & Tatiana Odzijewicz, 2019. "Optimal Leader–Follower Control for the Fractional Opinion Formation Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 1171-1185, September.
    10. Piotr Przybyła & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Rafał Weron, 2014. "Diffusion Of Innovation Within An Agent-Based Model: Spinsons, Independence And Advertising," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-22.
    11. Guzmán-Vargas, L. & Hernández-Pérez, R., 2006. "Small-world topology and memory effects on decision time in opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 372(2), pages 326-332.
    12. Tiwari, Mukesh & Yang, Xiguang & Sen, Surajit, 2021. "Modeling the nonlinear effects of opinion kinematics in elections: A simple Ising model with random field based study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    13. Simões, Tiago S.A.N. & Coniglio, Antonio & Herrmann, Hans J. & de Arcangelis, Lucilla, 2024. "Modeling public opinion control by a charismatic leader," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 648(C).
    14. Katarzyna Ostasiewicz & Michal H. Tyc & Piotr Goliczewski & Piotr Magnuszewski & Andrzej Radosz & Jan Sendzimir, 2006. "Integrating economic and psychological insights in binary choice models with social interactions," Papers physics/0609170, arXiv.org.
    15. Si, Xia-Meng & Wang, Wen-Dong & Ma, Yan, 2016. "Role of propagation thresholds in sentiment-based model of opinion evolution with information diffusion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 549-559.
    16. Karataieva, Tatiana & Koshmanenko, Volodymyr & Krawczyk, Małgorzata J. & Kułakowski, Krzysztof, 2019. "Mean field model of a game for power," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 535-547.
    17. repec:plo:pone00:0126090 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. AskariSichani, Omid & Jalili, Mahdi, 2015. "Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 229-239.
    19. Javarone, Marco Alberto, 2014. "Social influences in opinion dynamics: The role of conformity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 414(C), pages 19-30.
    20. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2020. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-29, December.
    21. repec:plo:pone00:0242148 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Sumin Yu & Zhijiao Du & Xuanhua Xu, 2021. "Hierarchical Punishment-Driven Consensus Model for Probabilistic Linguistic Large-Group Decision Making with Application to Global Supplier Selection," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1343-1372, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:904-:d:1607946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.