IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i8p1922-d1127402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization and Coordination of the Fresh Agricultural Product Supply Chain Considering the Freshness-Keeping Effort and Information Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Jinwu Gao

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Zhuolin Cui

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Huijie Li

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Ruru Jia

    (School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

Abstract

To solve freshness-keeping problems and analyse a retailer’s information sharing strategies in the fresh agricultural product supply chain (FAPSC), often confronted with challenges in keeping agri-products fresh in an uncertain market, we study an FAPSC via a decentralized mode in which the supplier or retailer exerts the freshness-keeping effort while the retailer decides its information sharing strategies regarding private demand forecasting. We consider a contract coordination mode including three incentive contracts, cost-sharing ( cs ), revenue-sharing ( re ) and revenue-and-cost-sharing ( rc ), to facilitate supply chain coordination. The results show that, as opposed to the case where the supplier takes on the freshness-keeping effort, the optimal freshness-keeping effort level, wholesale price and retail price are not only affected by the retailer’s information sharing strategy but also the freshness-keeping efficiency as the retailer exerts the freshness-keeping effort. Regarding the information sharing strategy, when the freshness-keeping effort is undertaken by the retailer, sharing information sometimes benefits the supplier; however, information sharing is never preferable for the retailer. Consequently, it is necessary to explore the supply chain coordination mode via effective incentive contracts which can improve the supplier and retailer’s profit. We also numerically analyze the effects of freshness-keeping efficiency on equilibrium decisions and expected profits in the decentralized mode, and the effects of the three contract parameters on the expected profits in equilibrium in the coordination mode.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinwu Gao & Zhuolin Cui & Huijie Li & Ruru Jia, 2023. "Optimization and Coordination of the Fresh Agricultural Product Supply Chain Considering the Freshness-Keeping Effort and Information Sharing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1922-:d:1127402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1922/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/8/1922/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bai, Qingguo & Chen, Mingyuan & Xu, Lei, 2017. "Revenue and promotional cost-sharing contract versus two-part tariff contract in coordinating sustainable supply chain systems with deteriorating items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 85-101.
    2. Zhang, Shuguang & Dan, Bin & Zhou, Maosen, 2019. "After-sale service deployment and information sharing in a supply chain under demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 351-363.
    3. Bo Yan & Jiwen Wu & Zijie Jin & Shiyou He, 2020. "Decision-making of fresh agricultural product supply chain considering the manufacturer’s fairness concerns," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 91-122, March.
    4. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    5. Bo Yan & Jing Fan & Congyan Cai & Jing Fang, 2020. "Supply chain coordination of fresh Agri-products based on value loss," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 185-196, December.
    6. Babaee, Sara & Araghi, Mojtaba & Rostami, Borzou, 2022. "Coordinating transportation and pricing policies for perishable products," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 105-125.
    7. Weixin Shang & Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2016. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 245-263, January.
    8. Liu, Chao & Lv, Jingyu & Hou, Ping & Lu, Danrong, 2023. "Disclosing products’ freshness level as a non-contractible quality: Optimal logistics service contracts in the fresh products supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1085-1102.
    9. ming, Luo & GuoHua, Zhou & Wei, Wei, 2021. "Study of the Game Model of E-Commerce Information Sharing in an Agricultural Product Supply Chain based on fuzzy big data and LSGDM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Xingzheng Ai & Jing Chen & Jianhua Ma, 2012. "Contracting with demand uncertainty under supply chain competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 17-38, December.
    11. Xu, Yuqiu & Wang, Jia & Cao, Kaiying, 2023. "Logistics mode strategy of firms selling fresh products on e-commerce platforms with private brand introduction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Liu, Chao & Chen, Weidong & Zhou, Qian & Mu, Jing, 2021. "Modelling dynamic freshness-keeping effort over a finite time horizon in a two-echelon online fresh product supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 511-528.
    13. Guan, Zili & Zhang, Xumei & Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Yiran, 2020. "Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Bian, Wenliang & Shang, Jennifer & Zhang, Juliang, 2016. "Two-way information sharing under supply chain competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 82-94.
    15. Yang, Lei & Tang, Ruihong, 2019. "Comparisons of sales modes for a fresh product supply chain with freshness-keeping effort," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 425-448.
    16. Liu, Molin & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Shuguang & Ma, Songxuan, 2021. "Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 572-584.
    17. Albert Y. Ha & Quan Tian & Shilu Tong, 2017. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 246-262, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Shi & Xin Li, 2023. "Optimization of a Two-Echelon Supply Chain Considering Consumer Low-Carbon Preference," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2023. "Gaining by ceding ‐ bounded wholesale pricing for information sharing in a supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 829-843, March.
    2. Cai, Jianhu & Sun, Haining & Shang, Jennifer & Hegde, Gajanan G., 2023. "Information structure selection in a green supply chain: Impacts of wholesale price and greenness level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 34-46.
    3. Yong Ma & Chunyu Li, 2023. "Optimal Strategies of Customization and Information Sharing in the Presence of Feature Creep," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Fu, Ke & Wang, Ce & Xu, Jiayan, 2022. "The impact of trade credit on information sharing in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. Fang Qiu & Qifan Hu & Bing Xu, 2020. "Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Coordination and Volume Loss Reduction Based on Strategic Consumer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Wu, Jiang & Zou, Liuxin & Gong, Yeming & Chen, Mingyang, 2021. "The anti-collusion dilemma: Information sharing of the supply chain under buyback contracts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Ma, Miaomiao & Meng, Weidong & Huang, Bo & Li, Yuyu, 2023. "The influence of dual credit policy on new energy vehicle technology innovation under demand forecast information asymmetry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    8. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Chen, Lei, 2022. "Creating all-win by blockchain in a remanufacturing supply chain with consumer risk-aversion and quality untrust," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    9. Zhong, Qinjia & Wang, Jianjun & Zou, Zongbao & Lai, Xiaofan, 2023. "The incentives for information sharing in online retail platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Dominguez, Roberto & Cannella, Salvatore & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana P. & Framinan, Jose M., 2018. "Information sharing in supply chains with heterogeneous retailers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 116-132.
    11. Lu, Jizhou & Feng, Gengzhong & Shum, Stephen & Lai, Kin Keung, 2021. "On the value of information sharing in the presence of information errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1139-1152.
    12. Qingren He & Shuting Li & Fei Xu & Wanhua Qiu, 2022. "Deep-Processing Service and Pricing Decisions for Fresh Products with the Rate of Deterioration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Tong, Yang & Lu, Tao & Li, Yina & Ye, Fei, 2023. "Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1113-1129.
    14. Guan, Zili & Zhang, Xumei & Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Yiran, 2020. "Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Roberto Dominguez & Salvatore Cannella & Borja Ponte & Jose M. Framinan, 2022. "Information sharing in decentralised supply chains with partial collaboration," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 263-292, June.
    16. Zheng, Shiyuan & Ge, Ying-En & Fu, Xiaowen & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xie, Chi, 2020. "Demand information sharing in port concession arrangements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 118-143.
    17. Qian Zheng & Manman Wang & Feng Yang, 2021. "Optimal Channel Strategy for a Fresh Produce E-Commerce Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    19. Xu, Hongyan & Liu, Xiaomin & Huang, He, 2023. "Information sharing and order allocation rule in dual-sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Guan, Xu & Huang, Song & Chen, Ying-Ju, 2022. "Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:8:p:1922-:d:1127402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.