IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p814-d1631261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition Through Collaboration: New Agricultural Business Entities Can Promote Crop Rotation Adoption in Heilongjiang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shengsheng Li

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Xiaoyu Fan

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Guoming Du

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
    College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Crop rotation emerges as a pivotal strategy addressing the decline in cultivated land quality and degradation and alleviating food production issues. However, the effective implementation of crop rotation policies remains challenging and requires further research. With the decline of the Chinese agricultural labor force, new agricultural business entities (NABEs), which encompass agricultural cooperatives, family farms, and agribusinesses, can play a significant role in agricultural modernization. Therefore, this research assesses how well NABEs encourage smallholders to adopt crop rotation practices, unraveling the mechanisms behind them and practical implementation pathways. Using survey data (n = 798) and the Tobit model, the findings of this research indicate the positive influence of NABEs in stimulating crop rotation among smallholders. This facilitation occurs via diverse mechanisms, including suitable access to land leasing, agricultural inputs, technical assistance, and market access. Additionally, the results indicate nuanced aspects, highlighting the heterogeneous impacts of NABEs across different contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengsheng Li & Xiaoyu Fan & Guoming Du, 2025. "Transition Through Collaboration: New Agricultural Business Entities Can Promote Crop Rotation Adoption in Heilongjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:814-:d:1631261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/814/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/814/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dries, Liesbeth & Ciaian, Pavel & Kancs, d’Artis, 2012. "Job creation and job destruction in EU agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 600-608.
    2. Li, Yuheng & Gao, Guangya & Wen, Jiuyao & Zhao, Ning & Du, Guoming & Stanny, Monika, 2025. "The measurement of agricultural disaster vulnerability in China and implications for land-supported agricultural resilience building," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Deininger, Klaus & Savastano, Sara & Carletto, Calogero, 2012. "Land Fragmentation, Cropland Abandonment, and Land Market Operation in Albania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 2108-2122.
    4. Zavalloni, Matteo & D’Alberto, Riccardo & Raggi, Meri & Viaggi, Davide, 2021. "Farmland abandonment, public goods and the CAP in a marginal area of Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Lowder, Sarah K. & Sánchez, Marco V. & Bertini, Raffaele, 2019. "Farms, family farms, farmland distribution and farm labour: What do we know today?," ESA Working Papers 301283, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    6. Dejsi Qorri & János Felföldi, 2024. "Research Trends in Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives: A Bibliometric Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Zuhui Huang & Qiao Liang, 2018. "Agricultural organizations and the role of farmer cooperatives in China since 1978: past and future," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 48-64, February.
    8. Li Ma & Chuangang Li & Minghan Xin & Nan Sun & Yun Teng, 2023. "Analysis of Efficiency Differences and Research on Moderate Operational Scale of New Agricultural Business Entities in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Wanglin Ma & Zhongkun Zhu, 2020. "A Note: Reducing Cropland Abandonment in China – Do Agricultural Cooperatives Play a Role?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 929-935, September.
    10. Jasper GRASHUIS & Ye SU, 2019. "A Review Of The Empirical Literature On Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership And Governance, Finance, And Member Attitude," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 77-102, March.
    11. Getaw Tadesse & Gashaw T. Abate & Kebebe Ergano, 2019. "The Boundary of Smallholder Producers’ Cooperatives: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 529-549, June.
    12. Magdalena Kozera-Kowalska & Jarosław Uglis, 2021. "Agribusiness as an Attractive Place to Work––A Gender Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    13. repec:lic:licosd:31512 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Zuhui Huang & Qiao Liang, 2018. "Agricultural organizations and the role of farmer cooperatives in China since 1978: past and future," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 48-64, February.
    15. Andrianarimanana, Mihasina Harinaivo & Yongjian, Pu & Rabezanahary Tanteliniaina, Mirindra Finaritra, 2023. "Assessment of the importance of climate, land, and soil on the global supply for agricultural products and global food security: Evidence from Madagascar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Guo, Di & Guo, Yan & Jiang, Kun, 2016. "Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1129-1144.
    17. Abebaw, Degnet & Haile, Mekbib G., 2013. "The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 82-91.
    18. Rui Zhang & Guoming Du & Bonoua Faye & Haijiao Liu, 2025. "Analysis of Farmers’ Crop Rotation Intention and Behavior Using Structural Equation Modeling: Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Guiomar, N. & Godinho, S. & Pinto-Correia, T. & Almeida, M. & Bartolini, F. & Bezák, P. & Biró, M. & Bjørkhaug, H. & Bojnec, Š. & Brunori, G. & Corazzin, M. & Czekaj, M. & Davidova, S. & Kania, J. & K, 2018. "Typology and distribution of small farms in Europe: Towards a better picture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 784-798.
    20. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    21. Wanglin Ma & Zhongkun Zhu & Xiaoshi Zhou, 2022. "Agricultural mechanization and cropland abandonment in rural China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 526-533, March.
    22. Lingjuan Cheng & Yilin Cui & Kaifeng Duan & Wei Zou, 2022. "The Influence of New Agricultural Business Entities on Farmers’ Employment Decision," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    23. Lingjuan Cheng & Wei Zou & Kaifeng Duan, 2021. "The Influence of New Agricultural Business Entities on the Economic Welfare of Farmer’s Families," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Linyi, 2024. "Big hands holding small hands: The role of new agricultural operating entities in farmland abandonment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Qiao Liang & Kangwei Ma & Wenhao Liu, 2023. "The role of farmer cooperatives in promoting environmentally sustainable agricultural development in China: A review," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 741-759, September.
    3. Menglu Li & Shemei Zhang & Nawab Khan, 2024. "Do farmers' professional cooperatives improve agricultural technical efficiency? Evidence using a national‐level dataset of China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 363-383, June.
    4. Ziming Liu & Jie Qu & Xinrui Wu & Xing Niu & Shuyi Feng, 2024. "Improving member satisfaction with cooperatives: The role of participation in governance," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 703-722, September.
    5. Lijun Zeng & Junyi Wan, 2024. "Substitution or Complement: How Do Contractual and Relational Governance Shape Members’ Organizational Commitment to Farmer Cooperatives?," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, July.
    6. Xinyi Li & Junichi Ito, 2025. "Multiple roles of agricultural cooperatives in improving farm technical efficiency: A case study of rural Gansu, China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 424-444, April.
    7. Kifle T. Sebhatu & Fatemeh Taheri & Tekeste Berhanu & Miet Maertens & Steven Van Passel & Marijke D'Haese, 2021. "Beyond focus: Exploring variability of service provision of agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 207-231, June.
    8. Jiang, Meishan & Li, Jingrong & Mi, Yunsheng, 2024. "Farmers’ cooperatives and smallholder farmers’ access to credit: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Biggeri, Mario & Carraro, Alessandro & Ciani, Federico & Romano, Donato, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of a multiple-component project on SDG dimensions: The case of durum wheat value chain development in Oromia (Ethiopia)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Xin Deng & Lingzhi Zhang & Rong Xu & Miao Zeng & Qiang He & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi, 2022. "Do Cooperatives Affect Groundwater Protection? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Wei Wei & Guanyi Yin & Shuai Xie & Qingzhi Sun & Zhan Zhang & Guanghao Li, 2023. "The Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Different New Agricultural Business Entities in China—Based on POI Data from 2012 to 2021," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Junying Lin & Songqing Jin & Hongdong Guo, 2023. "Do outsourcing services provided by agricultural cooperatives affect technical efficiency? Insights from tobacco farmers in China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 781-804, September.
    13. Gezahegn, Tafesse & Van Passel, Steven & Berhanu, Tekeste & D'Haese, Marijke & Maertens, Miet, 2020. "Structural and Institutional Heterogeneity among Agricultural Cooperatives in Ethiopia: Does it Matter for Farmers’ Welfare?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(2), August.
    14. Zhiping Huang & Tianran Wang & Na Li, 2022. "Reciprocal and Symbiotic: Family Farms’ Operational Performance and Long-Term Cooperation of Entities in the Agricultural Industrial Chain—From the Evidence of Xinjiang in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Hongyun Zheng & Puneet Vatsa & Wanglin Ma & Dil Bahadur Rahut, 2023. "Does agricultural cooperative membership influence off‐farm work decisions of farm couples?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 831-855, September.
    16. Luo, Yongmin & Ding, Shenqi & Xiang, Fuzheng & Wang, Lujun, 2024. "Reducing farmland abandonment by raising women’s education levels: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    18. Jie Yu & Fei You & Jian Wang & Zishan Wang, 2023. "Evolution Modes of Chili Pepper Industry Clusters under the Perspective of Social Network—An Example from Xinfu District, Xinzhou, Shanxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Rihong Zhang & Zejun Huang & Yuling Zhang & Zhong Xue & Xiaomin Li, 2023. "MSGV-YOLOv7: A Lightweight Pineapple Detection Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Keenan, Michael & Fort, Ricardo & Vargas, Ricardo, 2024. "Shocked into side-selling? Production shocks and organic coffee farmers’ marketing decisions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:814-:d:1631261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.