IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2024i1p11-d1552980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Four Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Change: Policy Impacts and Environmental Dynamics in the Min River Basin, Fujian, China

Author

Listed:
  • Weixuan Huang

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Anil Shrestha

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Yifan Xie

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Jianwu Yan

    (College of Tourism and Environment, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Jingxin Wang

    (School of Management, Yale University, 165 Whitney Ave., New Haven, CT 06511, USA)

  • Futao Guo

    (College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Yuee Cao

    (School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200034, China)

  • Guangyu Wang

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

Abstract

Land use and land cover change (LULCC) is crucial in sustainable land management. Over the past four decades, the Min River Basin (MRB) has experienced significant LULCC. This study investigated the dynamics of LULCC over these decades (1980–2020) and discusses the key drivers of land use change in different stages. First, we mapped and quantified changes (i.e., LULCC and landscape indices) in forests, croplands, urban areas, and water bodies from 1980 to 2020 using the China National Land Use/Cover Change (CNLUCC) and ArcGIS Pro 2.3. Second, by analyzing existing policies, we categorized four decades of LULCC trends from 1980 to 2020, delineating three distinct stages: (1) the Economic Restoration (ER) stage (1978–1989), when the ecological impacts of LULCC on forests, croplands, and water bodies received limited policy attention; (2) the Construction of Ecological Protection and Economic Development (EPED) stage (1989–2012), which saw a significant increase in forest coverage, primarily driven by various central and provincial environmental conservation policies, such as the Green for Grain and the “Three-Five-Seven Reforestation Project” in Fujian; and (3) the Ecological Civilization (EC) stage (2012–2020), in which policy focus shifted from expanding forest land areas to enhancing the quality of these areas. However, the cropland area has decreased due to urbanization policies and population migration from rural to urban areas, including the above-mentioned forest policies. Thus, this study highlights the complex relationship between different land use land cover policies, as some policies had synergistic effects between the policies and positive outcomes, while other policies showed conflicting outcomes. Our results emphasize the importance of integrated land and water resource management and provide insights for policymakers to balance development and environmental conservation policies in the MRB.

Suggested Citation

  • Weixuan Huang & Anil Shrestha & Yifan Xie & Jianwu Yan & Jingxin Wang & Futao Guo & Yuee Cao & Guangyu Wang, 2024. "Assessing Four Decades of Land Use and Land Cover Change: Policy Impacts and Environmental Dynamics in the Min River Basin, Fujian, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:11-:d:1552980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/11/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/11/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Zekun & Jiang, Caixin & Huang, Jun & Zhang, Weiwen & Li, Xuewen, 2023. "Fiscal incentive, political incentive, and strategic interaction of illegal land use by local governments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Yi, Yuanyuan, 2023. "Devolution of tenure rights in forestland in China: Impact on investment and forest growth," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Robin Naidoo, 2004. "Economic Growth and Liquidation of Natural Capital: The Case of Forest Clearance," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(2), pages 194-208.
    4. Chen Hu & Hongxiao Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Collective Forest Tenure Reform on Forest Carbon Sequestration Capacity—An Analysis Based on the Social–Ecological System Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Ziqiang Zhang & Jie He & Ming Huang & Wei Zhou, 2023. "Is Regulation Protection? Forest Logging Quota Impact on Forest Carbon Sinks in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Mengjie Tian & Mingyong Hong & Ji Wang, 2023. "Land resources, market-oriented reform and high-quality agricultural development," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4165-4197, December.
    7. Xiaojun Zhang & Weiqiao Wang & Yunan Bai & Yong Ye, 2022. "How Has China Structured Its Ecological Governance Policy System?—A Case from Fujian Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olegas Beriozovas & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Marius Aleinikovas, 2024. "Research Advancement in Forest Property Rights: A Thematic Review over Half a Decade Using Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Shilei Liu & Jinlei Qi & Jintao Xu & Yuanyuan Yi & Peng Yin & Maigeng Zhou, 2024. "Forest Mitigates Short-Term Health Risk of Air Pollution: Evidence from China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(8), pages 2163-2204, August.
    3. Zhang, Shouguo & Zhang, Jianjun & Dai, Yixin & Zhang, Ling, 2025. "Mitigating conflicts in the implementation of intensive land use policies: Insights from a tripartite evolutionary game model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Shannon Pendergast & Judith Clarke & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2008. "Corruption, Development and the Curse of Natural Resources," Working Papers 2008-10, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    5. Jinzhi Tong & Youyou Yang & Chunhua Zheng & Minglan Zheng, 2024. "Do Fiscal Incentives Contribute to Pollution Control? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Shannon M. Pendergast & Judith A. Clarke & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2010. "Corruption, development and the Curse of Natural Resources forthcoming Canadian Journal of Political Science," Department Discussion Papers 1002, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    7. Petar Kurecic & Filip Kokotovic, 2017. "Examining the "Natural Resource Curse" and the Impact of Various Forms of Capital in Small Tourism and Natural Resource-Dependent Economies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Chen, Xing & Xu, Jintao & Yi, Yuanyuan & Zhuge, Andong, 2025. "Land reform, emerging grassroots democracy and political trust in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. World Bank, 2005. "Forest Institutions in Transition," World Bank Publications - Reports 36684, The World Bank Group.
    10. Henk Folmer & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2006. "Deforestation," Working Papers 2006-06, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
      • Folmer, Henk & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2006. "Deforestation," Working Papers 37035, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    11. Vladislav N. Rutskiy & Maria V. Osipenko, 2020. "Green Economy as a Labor Productivity Factor in the Manufacturing Industry of European Union Countries," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 69-84, August.
    12. Ollivier, Hélène, 2012. "Growth, deforestation and the efficiency of the REDD mechanism," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 312-327.
    13. Mills, Julianne H. & Waite, Thomas A., 2009. "Economic prosperity, biodiversity conservation, and the environmental Kuznets curve," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2087-2095, May.
    14. Zoubida Mahcane & Mayou Abdellah & Mohamed Zergoune & Miloud Lacheheb, 2019. "Land Degradation and Economic Development in Algeria," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 137-142.
    15. Wang, Sen & DesRoches, C. Tyler & Sun, Lili & Stennes, Brad & Wilson, Bill & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2007. "Linking Forests and Economic Well-Being: A Four-Quadrant Approach," Working Papers 37036, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    16. Xie, Mingting & Irfan, Muhammad & Razzaq, Asif & Dagar, Vishal, 2022. "Forest and mineral volatility and economic performance: Evidence from frequency domain causality approach for global data," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Shangxiao Wang & Ming Zhang & Xi Xi, 2022. "Ecological Environment Evaluation Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index: A Case Study in East China over the Past 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Vladislav N. Rutskiy & Ilia A. Filippov, 2022. "Relationship Between the Level of Poverty and the Factors of Green Economy in the Countries of the European Union," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 56-70, February.
    19. Xinyue Wang & Kegao Yan & Yang Shi & Han Hu & Shanjun Mao, 2025. "The Nonlinear Impact of Economic Growth Pressure on Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency—Empirical Research from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, March.
    20. Cheng, Jian & Zhao, Jiangmeng & Liu, Dandan, 2024. "Incentive adjustments and land leasing behavior shifts: A quasi-natural experiment of off-office audits," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:11-:d:1552980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.