IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1208-d1672196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers of Public Welfare Land Ratios for Regional Development in China: A Central–Local Interaction Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Dai

    (School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Cultivated Land Protection Research Centre, China Land Survey and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Qingbin Wang

    (Cultivated Land Protection Research Centre, China Land Survey and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Xiongwei Zhou

    (School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Xinxian Qi

    (School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

Public welfare land allocation in China’s land expropriation process plays a crucial role in balancing economic development with social equity, but limited research has examined the driving factors influencing public welfare land ratio determination from a central–local relationship perspective. This study investigates how central–local government interactions shape public welfare land ratios in China’s land development process. Based on a comprehensive analysis of land expropriation data across different regions and administrative levels, we examine the spatial heterogeneity and underlying mechanisms of public welfare land allocation. The results reveal the following: (1) Significant regional variations exist for regional public welfare land ratios, with the national average public welfare land ratio reaching 41.21% in 2019 (for plots ≥4 hectares), varying from 39.60% in eastern regions to 44.93% in western regions. (2) Administrative hierarchy influences allocation patterns, with county-level cities (43.73%) showing higher proportions than provincial capitals (36.42%). (3) Local governments strategically use public welfare land development as an instrument to expand land-based fiscal resources by attracting investments and population. (4) Provincial governments serve as crucial intermediaries in central–local policy implementation, balancing central mandates with local conditions. This study contributes to the land governance literature by providing empirical evidence on how institutional arrangements affect land resource allocation. The findings suggest that establishing unified national standards while allowing provincial-level adaptations would improve the effectiveness of public welfare land policy in the post-land finance era, enhancing both governance efficiency and public welfare outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Dai & Qingbin Wang & Xiongwei Zhou & Xinxian Qi, 2025. "Drivers of Public Welfare Land Ratios for Regional Development in China: A Central–Local Interaction Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1208-:d:1672196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1208-:d:1672196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.