IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2236-d1548664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Challenges in Emerging Economic Corridors of the Global South: A Case Study of the Laos Economic Corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Mingjuan Dong

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Xingping Wang

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Yiran Yan

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250013, China)

  • Dongxue Li

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China)

Abstract

Economic corridors play a crucial role in promoting economic growth and facilitating coordinated regional development. However, land use changes associated with the development of emerging economic corridors have become a prominent source of conflict in regional integration in the Global South. This study takes the Laos Economic Corridor as a case study to explore the characteristics and driving mechanisms of land use changes in emerging economic corridor regions. Using global land cover data from 2000 to 2020 (GlobeLand30) and employing spatial statistical analysis, the Random Forest (RFC) algorithm, and the CA-Markov model, the study follows a Pattern–Process–Mechanism–Trend analytical framework to reveal the spatial distribution characteristics and transformation paths of land use within the corridor. The study results indicate that (1) The land use pattern in the Laos Economic Corridor has gradually shifted from a “single-core radial” structure to a “dumbbell-shaped” structure, promoting coordinated regional economic development. (2) A significant unidirectional flow of land use has been established, with forestland being converted into cultivated land and cultivated land being further converted into artificial surfaces. (3) In addition to the natural geographical constraints, the transport infrastructure and the spatial layout of industries are the main drivers for the expansion of ecological land, agricultural land, and built-up land. (4) Spatial planning interventions are essential and urgent: the establishment of land management rules based on the principles of forest conservation and intensive development can effectively control the uncontrolled expansion of artificial areas, significantly reduce the loss of forestland, and ensure the rational allocation of land resources for long-term development. The findings of this study offer valuable insights and reference points for the Global South, enhancing understanding of the spatial development dynamics of economic corridors, informing the optimization of land-use policies, and supporting efforts to promote regional integration and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingjuan Dong & Xingping Wang & Yiran Yan & Dongxue Li, 2024. "Land Use Challenges in Emerging Economic Corridors of the Global South: A Case Study of the Laos Economic Corridor," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2236-:d:1548664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander S. Linthicum & James H. Lambert, 2010. "Risk management for infrastructure corridors vulnerable to adjacent land development," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(8), pages 983-1006, December.
    2. Wolfersberger, Julien & Delacote, Philippe & Garcia, Serge, 2015. "An empirical analysis of forest transition and land-use change in developing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 241-251.
    3. Bao, Junlin & Gao, Shu & Ge, Jianxiong, 2019. "Dynamic land use and its policy in response to environmental and social-economic changes in China: A case study of the Jiangsu coast (1750–2015)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 169-180.
    4. Brunner, Hans-Peter, 2013. "What is Economic Corridor Development and What Can It Achieve in Asia’s Subregions?," Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration 117, Asian Development Bank.
    5. Dena Kasraian & Kees Maat & Dominic Stead & Bert van Wee, 2016. "Long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks on land-use change: an international review of empirical studies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 772-792, November.
    6. Chen Jun & Yifang Ban & Songnian Li, 2014. "Open access to Earth land-cover map," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7523), pages 434-434, October.
    7. Srivastava, Pradeep, 2011. "Regional Corridors Development in Regional Cooperation," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 258, Asian Development Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Cadene & Yves-Marie Rault Chodankar, 2019. "Industrial Corridors in India [Les corridors industriels en Inde]," Post-Print halshs-02541050, HAL.
    2. Reeg, Caroline, 2017. "Spatial development initiatives – potentials, challenges and policy lessons: with a specific outlook for inclusive agrocorridors in Sub-Sahara Africa," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 97, number 97, December.
    3. Kasraian, Dena & Maat, Kees & van Wee, Bert, 2018. "Urban developments and daily travel distances: Fixed, random and hybrid effects models using a Dutch pseudo-panel over three decades," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 228-236.
    4. Ibraeva, Anna & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Silva, Cecília & Antunes, António Pais, 2020. "Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 110-130.
    5. Jingyi Wang & Chen Weng & Zhen Wang & Chunming Li & Tingting Wang, 2022. "What Constitutes the High-Quality Soundscape in Human Habitats? Utilizing a Random Forest Model to Explore Soundscape and Its Geospatial Factors Behind," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Qing Yang & Zhanqiang Chang & Chou Xie & Chaoyong Shen & Bangsen Tian & Haoran Fang & Yihong Guo & Yu Zhu & Daoqin Zhou & Xin Yao & Guanwen Chen & Tao Xie, 2023. "Combining Soil Moisture and MT-InSAR Data to Evaluate Regional Landslide Susceptibility in Weining, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    7. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Xiang Li & Jingying Fu, 2022. "Accounting for Carbon Sink and Its Dominant Influencing Factors in Chinese Ecological Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Hao Wang & Yunfeng Hu, 2021. "Simulation of Biocapacity and Spatial-Temporal Evolution Analysis of Loess Plateau in Northern Shaanxi Based on the CA–Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Lennox, James, 2023. "Spatial economic dynamics in transport project appraisal," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Heagney, E.C. & Falster, D.S. & Kovač, M., 2021. "Land clearing in south-eastern Australia: Drivers, policy effects and implications for the future," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Mu Li & Lingli Zhang & Yuanyuan Chen & Shuangliang Liu & Mingyao Cai & Qiangqiang Sun, 2024. "Construction of Landscape Ecological Risk Collaborative Management Network in Mountainous Cities—A Case Study of Zhangjiakou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, September.
    12. Yunchen Wang & Boyan Li, 2022. "The Spatial Disparities of Land-Use Efficiency in Mainland China from 2000 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. de Jong, Wil & Liu, Jinlong & Youn, Yeo-Chang, 2017. "Land and forests in the Anthropocene: Trends and outlooks in Asia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 17-25.
    14. Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin & John Mangan & Elizabeth Jackson & Aurora Ruiz-Rua, 2016. "Understanding connectivity to international markets: a systematic review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 713-736, November.
    15. Yang, Jiawen & Su, Pinren & Cao, Jason, 2020. "On the importance of Shenzhen metro transit to land development and threshold effect," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Caravaggio, Nicola, 2022. "Economic growth and forest transition in Latin America," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Shital A. Thekdi & James H. Lambert, 2012. "Decision Analysis and Risk Models for Land Development Affecting Infrastructure Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(7), pages 1253-1269, July.
    18. Wei Guo & Yongjia Teng & Yueguan Yan & Chuanwu Zhao & Wanqiu Zhang & Xianglin Ji, 2022. "Simulation of Land Use and Carbon Storage Evolution in Multi-Scenario: A Case Study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Ziqian Kang & Shuo Wang & Ling Xu & Fenglin Yang & Shushen Zhang, 2021. "Suitability assessment of urban land use in Dalian, China using PNN and GIS," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 913-936, March.
    20. Thevenin, Thomas & Mimeur, Christophe & Schwartz, Robert & Sapet, Loïc, 2016. "Measuring one century of railway accessibility and population change in France. A historical GIS approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 62-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2236-:d:1548664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.