IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i1p237-d1033021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System Cognition and Analytic Technology of Cultivated Land Quality from a Data Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Huaizhi Tang

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Jiacheng Niu

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Zibing Niu

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Qi Liu

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Yuanfang Huang

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Wenju Yun

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Chongyang Shen

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Zejun Huo

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

As cultivated land quality has been paid more and more scientific attention, its connotation generalization and cognitive bias are widespread, bringing many challenges to the investigation and evaluation of regional cultivated land quality and its data analysis and mining. Establishing a systematic and interdisciplinary cognitive approach to cultivated land quality is urgent and necessary. Therefore, we explored and developed a conceptual framework of the model for the cultivated land quality analysis from the data perspective, including cultivated land quality ontology, mapping, correlation, and decision models. We identified the primary content of cultivated land quality perceptions and four cognitive mechanisms. We built vital technologies, such as the collaborative perception of the quality of cultivated land, intelligent treatment, diagnostic evaluation, and simulation prediction. Applying this analysis framework, we sorted out the frequency of indicators that characterize the function of cultivated land according to the literature in recent years and have built the cognitive system of cultivated land quality in the black soil region of Northeast China. The system’s central component was production capacity and it had three components: a foundation, a guarantee, and an effect. The black soil region cultivated land quality evaluation system has seven purposes involving 20–31 key indicators: production supply, threat control, farmland infrastructure regulation, cultivated land ecological maintenance, economics, social culture, and environmental protection. In various application contexts, the system had many critical supporting technologies. The results demonstrate that the framework has strong adaptability, efficiency, and scalability, which might offer a theoretical direction for further studies on the evaluation of the quality of cultivated land in the area. The analysis framework established in this study is helpful to deepen the understanding of cultivated land quality systems from the perspective of big data. Taking the big data of cultivated land quality as the driving force, combined with the technical methods of cultivated land quality analysis, the evaluation results of cultivated land quality under different scenarios and different objectives are optimized. In addition, the framework can serve the practice of farmland management and engineering improvement, adapt to the management needs of different objects and different scales, and achieve the combination of theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaizhi Tang & Jiacheng Niu & Zibing Niu & Qi Liu & Yuanfang Huang & Wenju Yun & Chongyang Shen & Zejun Huo, 2023. "System Cognition and Analytic Technology of Cultivated Land Quality from a Data Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:237-:d:1033021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ania Cravero & Ana Bustamante & Marlene Negrier & Patricio Galeas, 2022. "Agricultural Big Data Architectures in the Context of Climate Change: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Huaizhi Tang & Wenping Liu & Wenju Yun, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Green Spaces in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region in the Past 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Keith H Coble & Ashok K Mishra & Shannon Ferrell & Terry Griffin, 2018. "Big Data in Agriculture: A Challenge for the Future," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 79-96.
    4. Jiacheng Niu & Huaizhi Tang & Qi Liu & Feng Cheng & Leina Zhang & Lingling Sang & Yuanfang Huang & Chongyang Shen & Bingbo Gao & Zibing Niu, 2022. "Determinants of Soil Bacterial Diversity in a Black Soil Region in a Large-Scale Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Yao & Guohua He & Wei Li & Yong Zhao & Haihong Li & Fan He, 2023. "Assessing the Influence of Water Conservancy Projects on China’s Reserve Resources for Cultivated Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Xiang Li & Jiang Zhu & Tao Liu & Xiangdong Yin & Jiangchun Yao & Hao Jiang & Bing Bu & Jianlong Yan & Yixuan Li & Zhangcheng Chen, 2023. "Quota and Space Allocations of New Urban Land Supported by Urban Growth Simulations: A Case Study of Guangzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Han Liu & Yu Wang & Lingling Sang & Caisheng Zhao & Tengyun Hu & Hongtao Liu & Zheng Zhang & Shuyu Wang & Shuangxi Miao & Zhengshan Ju, 2023. "Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Changes in Cropland Quantity and Quality with Multi-Source Remote Sensing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Li, Lei & Lin, Jiabao & Ouyang, Ye & Luo, Xin (Robert), 2022. "Evaluating the impact of big data analytics usage on the decision-making quality of organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Mohammad Amiri-Zarandi & Rozita A. Dara & Emily Duncan & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2022. "Big Data Privacy in Smart Farming: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Robert Finger, 2023. "Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1277-1309.
    6. Schroeder, Ted C. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Coffey, Brian K., 2019. "Commodity futures with thinly traded cash markets: The case of live cattle," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Rim Lassoued & Diego M. Macall & Stuart J. Smyth & Peter W. B. Phillips & Hayley Hesseln, 2021. "Expert Insights on the Impacts of, and Potential for, Agricultural Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Keith H. Coble, 2020. "Relevant and/or Elegant Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 392-399, March.
    9. Cara Stitzlein & Simon Fielke & François Waldner & Todd Sanderson, 2021. "Reputational Risk Associated with Big Data Research and Development: An Interdisciplinary Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Oksana Hrynevych & Miguel Blanco Canto & Mercedes Jiménez García, 2022. "Tendencies of Precision Agriculture in Ukraine: Disruptive Smart Farming Tools as Cooperation Drivers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Rabhi, Loubna & Jabir, Brahim & Falih, Noureddine & Afraites, Lekbir & Bouikhalene, Belaid, 2023. "A Connected farm Metamodeling Using Advanced Information Technologies for an Agriculture 4.0," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(2), June.
    12. Emily Duncan & Alesandros Glaros & Dennis Z. Ross & Eric Nost, 2021. "New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 1181-1199, December.
    13. Li, Ye & Chen, Yiyan & Li, Qun, 2020. "Assessment analysis of green development level based on S-type cloud model of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Amanda M. Nelson & Nicolas E. Quintana Ashwell & Christopher D. Delhom & Drew M. Gholson, 2022. "Leveraging Big Data to Preserve the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer: A Blueprint for the National Center for Alluvial Aquifer Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Ayorinde Ogunyiola & Maaz Gardezi, 2022. "Restoring sense out of disorder? Farmers’ changing social identities under big data and algorithms," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1451-1464, December.
    16. Michael Selle & Fabian Spieß & Christian Visscher & Silke Rautenschlein & Arne Jung & Monika Auerbach & Jörg Hartung & Christian Sürie & Ottmar Distl, 2023. "Real-Time Monitoring of Animals and Environment in Broiler Precision Farming—How Robust Is the Data Quality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Zu, Xiaoyi & Li, Zhixian & Gao, Chen & Wang, Yi, 2022. "Interpretation of Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Community Green Spaces Based on Service Efficiency and Distribution Characteristics: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Beijing, China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23.
    18. Aithal, Sreeramana & L. M., Madhushree, 2019. "Information Communication & Computation Technology (ICCT) as a Strategic Tool for Industry Sectors," MPRA Paper 105619, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Ricardo Chalmeta & Nestor J. Santos-deLeón, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain in the Era of Industry 4.0 and Big Data: A Systematic Analysis of Literature and Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Michael A. Boland & Brian C. Briggeman & Keri Jacobs & Phil Kenkel & Gregory McKee & John L. Park, 2021. "Research Priorities for Agricultural Cooperatives and their Farmer‐Members," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 573-585, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:237-:d:1033021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.