IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1199-d876205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Carbon Trading System on Green Economic Growth in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Nie

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, No 100, Da Xue Road, Nanning 530004, China
    China Center for Agricultural Policy (CCAP), School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, No 5, Yi He Yuan Road, Beijing 100871, China
    Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • Zhoupeng Chen

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, No 100, Da Xue Road, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Linfang Yang

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, No 100, Da Xue Road, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Qiaoling Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, No 100, Da Xue Road, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Jiaxin He

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, No 100, Da Xue Road, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Huixian Qin

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, No 100, Da Xue Road, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Han Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Guangxi University, No 100, Da Xue Road, Nanning 530004, China
    China Center for Agricultural Policy (CCAP), School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, No 5, Yi He Yuan Road, Beijing 100871, China
    Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

Abstract

Whether China’s economy can maintain sustainable growth has been debated both in China and internationally, and the most representative critique has been summarized in the “Krugman Query”. Faced with such doubts, how to achieve a “win-win” for economic growth and environmental protection has become one of the central objectives of local government work while striving for the new vision of development. Taking China’s carbon trading pilot policy as an example, and based on panel data of 30 provincial administrative regions in China from 2001 to 2018, this paper uses the Data Envelopment Analysis-Malmquist index model and the Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Difference method to measure the level of green economic growth from two aspects: green development mode and economic growth effect, and further explore the impact of China’s carbon trading system on green economic growth. The results show that the implementation of the carbon trading system promoted both the green development level and economic growth of pilot cities, and positively affected green total factor productivity, refuting the “Krugman Query”. Finally, the study puts forward a series of recommendations in strengthening environmental regulation, improving green technology innovation, and developing low-carbon industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Nie & Zhoupeng Chen & Linfang Yang & Qiaoling Wang & Jiaxin He & Huixian Qin & Han Wang, 2022. "Impact of Carbon Trading System on Green Economic Growth in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1199-:d:876205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1199/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1199/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miyamoto, Mai & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2019. "Climate agreement and technology diffusion: Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1331-1338.
    2. Su, Hongwei & Liang, Biming, 2021. "The impact of regional market integration and economic opening up on environmental total factor energy productivity in Chinese provinces," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    3. Fengsong Pei & Rui Zhong & Li-An Liu & Yingjuan Qiao, 2021. "Decoupling the Relationships between Carbon Footprint and Economic Growth within an Urban Agglomeration—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Adam B. Jaffe & Karen Palmer, 1997. "Environmental Regulation And Innovation: A Panel Data Study," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(4), pages 610-619, November.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Pedro Naso & Yi Huang Author Name: Tim Swanson, 2017. "The Porter Hypothesis Goes to China: Spatial Development, Environmental Regulation and Productivity," CIES Research Paper series 53-2017, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    7. Jingyi Wang & Kaisi Sun & Jiupai Ni & Deti Xie, 2021. "Evaluation and Factor Analysis of Industrial Carbon Emission Efficiency Based on “Green-Technology Efficiency”—The Case of Yangtze River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Chintrakarn, Pandej, 2008. "Environmental regulation and U.S. states' technical inefficiency," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 363-365, September.
    9. Raźniak Piotr & Dorocki Sławomir & Winiarczyk-Raźniak Anna, 2020. "Spatial changes in the command and control function of cities based on the corporate centre of gravity model," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 24(1), pages 35-41, January.
    10. Csomós György, 2017. "Cities as command and control centres of the world economy: An empirical analysis, 2006–2015," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 38(38), pages 7-26, December.
    11. Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry & Richard Lajeunesse, 2001. "Environmental Regulation and Productivity: New Findings on the Porter Hypothesis," Cahiers de recherche 01-05, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
    12. Gao, Yuning & Zhang, Meichen & Zheng, Jinghai, 2021. "Accounting and determinants analysis of China's provincial total factor productivity considering carbon emissions," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Richard Lajeunesse & Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry, 2001. "Environmental Regulation and Productivity: New Findings on the Porter Analysis," CIRANO Working Papers 2001s-53, CIRANO.
    14. Asdrubali, F. & Baggio, P. & Prada, A. & Grazieschi, G. & Guattari, C., 2020. "Dynamic life cycle assessment modelling of a NZEB building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Zhang, Hongwei & Shao, Yanmin & Han, Xiping & Chang, Hsu-Ling, 2022. "A road towards ecological development in China: The nexus between green investment, natural resources, green technology innovation, and economic growth," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changcun Wen & Jiaru Zheng & Bao Hu & Qingning Lin, 2022. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in the Counties of Zhejiang Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Zhichao Li & Bojia Liu, 2023. "Understanding Carbon Emissions Reduction in China: Perspectives of Political Mobility," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Henryk Dzwigol & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Regulations, Renewable Energy, and Energy Efficiency in Finding the Path to Green Economic Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muyao Li & Jinsong Zhang & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Ruiqian Li, 2020. "Opening the Black Box: The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Anabel Zárate-Marco & Jaime Vallés-Giménez, 2015. "Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 313-339, October.
    3. Badunenko, Oleg & Galeotti, Marzio & Hunt, Lester C., 2021. "Better to grow or better to improve? Measuring environmental efficiency in OECD countries with a Stochastic Environmental Kuznets Frontier," FEEM Working Papers 316226, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Yang Shen & Xiuwu Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Long Chen & Nan Wang & Qiyun Li & Wenjun Zhou, 2023. "Environmental regulation, foreign direct investment and China’s economic development under the new normal: restrain or promote?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4195-4216, May.
    6. Zebin Zheng & Wenjun Xiao & Ziye Cheng, 2023. "China’s Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency Assessment Based on Coordinated Reduction in Pollution and Carbon Emission: From the 11th to the 13th Five-Year Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Piotr Raźniak & György Csomós & Sławomir Dorocki & Anna Winiarczyk-Raźniak, 2021. "Exploring the Shifting Geographical Pattern of the Global Command-and-Control Function of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Peng Qi & Yu Shang & Fang Han, 2022. "The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Investment Efficiency—An Empirical Analysis of Manufacturing Firms in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Cui Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Cuixia Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Ramanathan, Usha & Bentley, Yongmei, 2018. "The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance – A novel use of DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 131-138.
    11. Ben Kriechel & Thomas Ziesemer, 2009. "The environmental Porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 267-294.
    12. Quan Guo & Min Zhou & Nana Liu & Yaoyu Wang, 2019. "Spatial Effects of Environmental Regulation and Green Credits on Green Technology Innovation under Low-Carbon Economy Background Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Di Lv & Chaobo Zhou, 2023. "Can the Green Finance Reform and Innovation Improve Green Investment of Heavily Polluting Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Piotr Raźniak & Sławomir Dorocki & Tomasz Rachwał & Anna Winiarczyk-Raźniak, 2021. "The Role of the Energy Sector in the Command and Control Function of Cities in Conditions of Sustainability Transitions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Wugan Cai & Peiyun Ye, 2022. "Local-neighborhood effects of different environmental regulations on green innovation: evidence from prefecture level cities of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4810-4834, April.
    16. Yu-Hong Cao & Jian-Xin You & Hu-Chen Liu, 2017. "Optimal Environmental Regulation Intensity of Manufacturing Technology Innovation in View of Pollution Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Shunsuke Managi & SJames J. Opaluch & Di Jin & Thomas A. Grigalunas, 2005. "Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 81(2).
    18. Badunenko, Oleg & Galeotti, Marzio & Hunt, Lester C., 2023. "Better to grow or better to improve? Measuring environmental efficiency in OECD countries with a stochastic environmental Kuznets frontier (SEKF)," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    19. Jie Jiang & Qihang Zhang & Yifan Hui, 2023. "The Impact of Market and Non-Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments on Firms’ Sustainable Technological Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Juying Zeng & Jun Ren, 2022. "How does green entrepreneurship affect environmental improvement? Empirical findings from 293 enterprises," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 409-434, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1199-:d:876205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.