IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2001s-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Environmental Regulation and Productivity: New Findings on the Porter Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Lajeunesse
  • Paul Lanoie
  • Michel Patry

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical analysis of the relationship between the stringency of environmental regulation and total factor productivity (TFP) growth in the Quebec manufacturing sector. This allows us to investigate more fully the Porter hypothesis in three directions. First, the dynamic aspect of the hypothesis is captured through the use of lagged regulation variables. Second, we argue that the hypothesis is more relevant for more polluting sectors. Third, we argue that the hypothesis is more relevant for sectors which are more exposed to international competition. Our empirical results suggest that: 1) the contemporaneous impact of environmental regulation on productivity is negative, 2) the opposite result is observed with lagged regulation variables and 3) this effect is stronger in a sub-group of industries which are more exposed to international competition. Ce texte présente une analyse empirique de la relation entre l'ampleur de la réglementation environnementale et la productivité totale des facteurs en utilisant des données du secteur manufacturier québécois. Cet exercice nous permet de pousser l'analyse de l'hypothèse porterienne dans trois directions. Premièrement, l'introduction de variables réglementaires retardées nous permet de mieux capter l'aspect dynamique de l'hypothèse. Deuxièmement, nous postulons que l'hypothèse de Porter a plus de chance d'être valide dans les secteurs très polluants. Troisièmement, nous postulons qu'il sera de même dans les secteurs plus exposés à la concurrence extérieure. Nos résultats empiriques suggèrent que: 1) l'impact de la variable contemporaine de réglementation est négatif; 2) le résultat contraire est observé pour les variables de réglementation retardées et 3) cet effet est plus fort dans les secteurs les plus exposés à la concurrence extérieure.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Lajeunesse & Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry, 2001. "Environmental Regulation and Productivity: New Findings on the Porter Analysis," CIRANO Working Papers 2001s-53, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2001s-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2001s-53.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M. Maheu & Thomas H. McCurdy, 2002. "Nonlinear Features of Realized FX Volatility," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(4), pages 668-681, November.
    2. Christoffersen, Peter & Ghysels, Eric & Swanson, Norman R., 2002. "Let's get "real" about using economic data," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 343-360, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2005. "Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis," Cahiers de recherche 0505, Université Laval - Département d'économique.
    2. Anabel Zárate-Marco & Jaime Vallés-Giménez, 2015. "Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 313-339, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Porter hypothesis; environmental regulation; productivity; Hypothèse de Porter; réglementation environnementale; productivité;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2001s-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Webmaster). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.