IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2116-d982565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Coupling Coordination between the Competitiveness Level and Land Use Efficiency of Green Food Industry in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongming Li

    (College of Economics and Management, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Wei Fu

    (College of Economics and Management, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Mingcan Luo

    (College of Economics and Management, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Jiancheng Chen

    (College of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

With the development of the green food industry, land conflicts are gradually escalating, and the coordinated development of competitiveness level and land use efficiency is crucial to the green food industry. The competitiveness level of China’s green food industry at the provincial level between 2011 and 2020 was measured by constructing an index system using the entropy method and VlseCriterion Optimisation and Compromise Resolution (VIKOR) method, and then the land use efficiency was evaluated using the super efficiency Slacks-based Measurement (SBM) model, and the coupling coordination degree was analyzed using the coupling coordination model based on the results of both measurements. The results showed that the competitiveness level of the green food industry was “high in the west and low in the east”; most provinces and cities were with the middle competitiveness level. Land use efficiency generally showed a trend of rising and then falling and leveling off, and the average value of the three regions was ranked as eastern (1.13) > western (0.84) > middle (0.63). The mean value (0.82) of the overall coupling coordination in China floated at the boundary of high-quality coordination, and all three regions showed a trend of rising and then falling and leveling off, and the number of provinces and cities in high-quality coordination in China was shifting from the north to the south during 2011–2020. This study can provide theoretical support for the coordinated development between industrial development and land use, and provide feasible suggestions for the intensive and efficient use of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongming Li & Wei Fu & Mingcan Luo & Jiancheng Chen, 2022. "The Coupling Coordination between the Competitiveness Level and Land Use Efficiency of Green Food Industry in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2116-:d:982565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Hualin & Chen, Qianru & Lu, Fucai & Wu, Qing & Wang, Wei, 2018. "Spatial-temporal disparities, saving potential and influential factors of industrial land use efficiency: A case study in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-529.
    2. Lindström, Hanna & Lundberg, Sofia & Marklund, Per-Olov, 2020. "How Green Public Procurement can drive conversion of farmland: An empirical analysis of an organic food policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Hongbin Liu & Yuepeng Zhou, 2018. "Urbanization, Land Use Behavior and Land Quality in Rural China: An Analysis Based on Pressure-Response-Impact Framework and SEM Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Radka Redlichová & Gabriela Chmelíková & Ivana Blažková & Eliška Svobodová & Inez Naaki Vanderpuje, 2021. "Organic Food Needs More Land and Direct Energy to Be Produced Compared to Food from Conventional Farming: Empirical Evidence from the Czech Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Fei, Rilong & Lin, Ziyi & Chunga, Joseph, 2021. "How land transfer affects agricultural land use efficiency: Evidence from China’s agricultural sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 514-529, April.
    7. Yu, Junqing & Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2019. "Land use efficiency and influencing factors of urban agglomerations in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Eva-Marie Meemken & Matin Qaim, 2018. "Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 39-63, October.
    9. Aigul Yerseitova & Sara Issakova & Leila Jakisheva & Almarа Nauryzbekova & Altynay Moldasheva, 2018. "Efficiency of using agricultural land in Kazakhstan," Post-Print hal-02342892, HAL.
    10. Samia Ayyub & Xuhui Wang & Muhammad Asif & Rana Muhammad Ayyub, 2018. "Antecedents of Trust in Organic Foods: The Mediating Role of Food Related Personality Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Bengochea Paz, Diego & Henderson, Kirsten & Loreau, Michel, 2020. "Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    12. Aigul Yerseitova & Sara Issakova & Leila Jakisheva & Almara Nauryzbekova & Altynay Moldasheva, 2018. "Efficiency of using agricultural land in Kazakhstan," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 558-576, December.
    13. Jiuliang Xu & Zhihua Zhang & Xian Zhang & Muhammad Ishfaq & Jiahui Zhong & Wei Li & Fusuo Zhang & Xuexian Li, 2020. "Green Food Development in China: Experiences and Challenges," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Haizhen Chen & Yi Chen & Xiaosong Chen & Xingzhong Zhang & Haowei Wu & Zhihui Li, 2022. "Impacts of Historical Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Kuang, Bing & Lu, Xinhai & Zhou, Min & Chen, Danling, 2020. "Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: Empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Xiaochun Zhao & Laichun Long & Qun Sun & Wei Zhang, 2022. "How to Evaluate Investment Efficiency of Environmental Pollution Control: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Rongtian Zhang & Jianfei Lu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Convergence Characteristics of Provincial Urban Land Use Efficiency under Environmental Constraints in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Ranran Li & Ziyuan Ding & Yan An, 2022. "Examination and Forecast of Relationship among Tourism, Environment, and Economy: A Case Study in Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Pierre Damien Ntihinyurwa & Walter Timo de Vries & Edith Ishimwe Ngenzi, 2019. "Why Tenure Responsive Land-Use Planning Matters: Insights for Land Use Consolidation for Food Security in Rwanda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziqiang Li & Weijiao Ye & Ciwen Zheng, 2025. "The Impact of Food Import Competition Effects on Water–Land–Food System Coordination: A Perspective from Land Use Efficiency for Food Production in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Zhu & Yinghong Wang & Shangui Peng & Fenglin Zhang, 2022. "Influence Mechanism of Polycentric Spatial Structure on Urban Land Use Efficiency: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Fei, Rilong & Lin, Ziyi & Chunga, Joseph, 2021. "How land transfer affects agricultural land use efficiency: Evidence from China’s agricultural sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Ying Chen & Suran Li & Long Cheng, 2020. "Evaluation of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency with Environmental Constraints in the Dongting Lake Eco-Economic Zone of Hunan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Pengnan Xiao & Jie Xu & Zupeng Yu & Peng Qian & Mengyao Lu & Chao Ma, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Pattern Differentiation and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Hubei Province under Carbon Emission Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Huifang Cheng & Ting Yu & Hao Zhang & Kaifeng Duan & Jianing Zhu, 2022. "Dynamic Estimation of Urban Land Use Efficiency and Sustainability Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Xufeng Cui & Sheng Yang & Guanghong Zhang & Bin Liang & Fei Li, 2020. "An Exploration of a Synthetic Construction Land Use Quality Evaluation Based on Economic-Social-Ecological Coupling Perspective: A Case Study in Major Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Houtian Tang & Yuanlai Wu & Jinxiu Chen & Liuxin Deng & Minjie Zeng, 2022. "How Does Change in Rural Residential Land Affect Cultivated Land Use Efficiency? An Empirical Study Based on 42 Cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Rongtian Zhang & Jianfei Lu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Convergence Characteristics of Provincial Urban Land Use Efficiency under Environmental Constraints in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Xinhai Lu & Jiao Hou & Yifeng Tang & Ting Wang & Tianyi Li & Xupeng Zhang, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of the Highway Infrastructure Construction and the Threshold Effect on Cultivated Land Use Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Provincial Panel Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Yi Qu & Xiao Lyu & Wenlong Peng & Zongfei Xin, 2021. "How to Evaluate the Green Utilization Efficiency of Cultivated Land in a Farming Household? A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Hongmei Wen & Yufei Wu & Zhicheng Zhou & Shen Zhong, 2025. "The Impact of Land Use Efficiency on County-Level PM2.5: Evidence from 1125 Counties in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Yayuan Pang & Xinjun Wang, 2020. "Land-Use Efficiency in Shandong (China): Empirical Analysis Based on a Super-SBM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Vasilii Erokhin & Tianming Gao & Anna Ivolga, 2020. "Structural Variations in the Composition of Land Funds at Regional Scales across Russia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-39, June.
    17. Li, Dalei & Gao, Jianzhong, 2021. "Impact of Large-Scale Land Operation on the Development of Regional Public Brands of Agricultural Products," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329397, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    18. Zhongxun Zhang & Kaifang Shi & Zhiyong Zhu & Lu Tang & Kangchuan Su & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Rural Natural Capital Utilization Efficiency: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    19. Ostapchuk, Tetiana & Orlova, Kateryna & Biriuchenko, Svitlana & Dankevych, Andrii & Marchuk, Galyna, 2021. "Defuzzification in the process of managerial estimating the value of agricultural lands," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(4), December.
    20. Aiping Wang & Weifen Lin & Bei Liu & Hui Wang & Hong Xu, 2021. "Does Smart City Construction Improve the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2116-:d:982565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.