IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i9p489-d1740695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explainable Machine Learning Models for Credit Rating in Colombian Solidarity Sector Entities

Author

Listed:
  • María Andrea Arias-Serna

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Jhon Jair Quiza-Montealegre

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Luis Fernando Móntes-Gómez

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Leandro Uribe Clavijo

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Andrés Felipe Orozco-Duque

    (Department of Applied Sciences, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Cl. 73 #76A-354, Medellín 050034, Colombia)

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology for implementing a custom-developed explainability model for credit rating using behavioral data registered during the lifecycle of the borrowing that can replicate the score given by the regulatory model for the solidarity economy in Colombia. The methodology integrates continuous behavioral and financial variables from over 17,000 real credit histories into predictive models based on ridge regression, decision trees, random forests, XGBoost, and LightGBM. The models were trained and evaluated using cross-validation and RMSE metrics. LightGBM emerged as the most accurate model, effectively capturing nonlinear credit behavior patterns. To ensure interpretability, SHAP was used to identify the contribution of each feature to the model predictions. The presented model using LightGBM predicted the credit risk assessment in accordance with the regulatory model used by the Colombian Superintendence of the Solidarity Economy, with a root-mean-square error of 0.272 and an R 2 score of 0.99. We propose an alternative framework using explainable machine learning models aligned with the internal ratings-based approach under Basel II. Our model integrates variables collected throughout the borrowing lifecycle, offering a more comprehensive perspective than the regulatory model. While the regulatory framework adjusts itself generically to national regulations, our approach explicitly accounts for borrower-specific dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • María Andrea Arias-Serna & Jhon Jair Quiza-Montealegre & Luis Fernando Móntes-Gómez & Leandro Uribe Clavijo & Andrés Felipe Orozco-Duque, 2025. "Explainable Machine Learning Models for Credit Rating in Colombian Solidarity Sector Entities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:489-:d:1740695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/489/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/489/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gambacorta, Leonardo & Huang, Yiping & Qiu, Han & Wang, Jingyi, 2024. "How do machine learning and non-traditional data affect credit scoring? New evidence from a Chinese fintech firm," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Michael Jacobs, 2020. "A Holistic Model Validation Framework for Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Model Development and Implementation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-36, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galeone, Graziana & Ranaldo, Simona & Fusco, Antonio, 2024. "ESG and FinTech: Are they connected?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Yetong Fang, 2025. "Application of a grey wolf optimization-enhanced convolutional neural network and bidirectional gated recurrent unit model for credit scoring prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Fiorella De Fiore & Leonardo Gambacorta & Cristina Manea, 2023. "Big techs and the credit channel of monetary policy," BIS Working Papers 1088, Bank for International Settlements.
    4. Yiping Huang & Xue Wang & Xun Wang, 2020. "Mobile Payment in China: Practice and Its Effects," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 1-18, Fall.
    5. Kowalewski, Oskar & Pisany, Paweł, 2022. "Banks' consumer lending reaction to fintech and bigtech credit emergence in the context of soft versus hard credit information processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Cornelli, Giulio & De Fiore, Fiorella & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Manea, Cristina, 2024. "Fintech vs bank credit: How do they react to monetary policy?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Zhang, Hong & Wang, Yuejing & Wang, Xiaoquan, 2024. "The impact of financial deepening on agricultural production: A household-level analysis of BigTech finance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 57-77.
    8. Zhong, Changbiao & Zhang, Chao, 2024. "Can data elements enhance urban innovation? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Cornelli, Giulio & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Jagtiani, Julapa, 2024. "The impact of fintech lending on credit access for U.S. small businesses," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Huang, Yiping & Li, Zhenhua & Qiu, Han & Tao, Sun & Wang, Xue & Zhang, Longmei, 2023. "BigTech credit risk assessment for SMEs," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Tobias Berg & Andreas Fuster & Manju Puri, 2022. "FinTech Lending," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 187-207, November.
    12. Gross, Christian & Jarmuzek, Mariusz & Pancaro, Cosimo, 2021. "Macro-stress testing dividend income. Evidence from euro area banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Bank for International Settlements, 2020. "The dawn of fintech in Latin America: landscape, prospects and challenges," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 112, June.
    14. Liu, Tao & Yu, Yanxin & Gong, Di & Guo, Min, 2024. "Geographic disparities in bank lending: Evidence from an auto loan market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Wang, Yichen & Hu, Jun & Chen, Jia, 2023. "Does Fintech facilitate cross-border M&As? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Jaewon Park & Minsoo Shin & Wookjae Heo, 2021. "Estimating the BIS Capital Adequacy Ratio for Korean Banks Using Machine Learning: Predicting by Variable Selection Using Random Forest Algorithms," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Hans Genberg & Özer Karagedikli, 2021. "Machine Learning and Central Banks: Ready for Prime Time?," Working Papers wp43, South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN) Research and Training Centre.
    18. Peter Eccles & Paul Grout & Paolo Siciliani & Anna Zalewska, 2021. "The impact of machine learning and big data on credit markets," Bank of England working papers 930, Bank of England.
    19. Lin, Aijie & Peng, Yulei & Wu, Xi, 2022. "Digital finance and investment of micro and small enterprises: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Lei Lu & Jianxing Wei & Weixing Wu & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Pricing strategies in BigTech lending: Evidence from China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 333-374, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:489-:d:1740695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.