IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i9p489-d1740695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explainable Machine Learning Models for Credit Rating in Colombian Solidarity Sector Entities

Author

Listed:
  • María Andrea Arias-Serna

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Jhon Jair Quiza-Montealegre

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Luis Fernando Móntes-Gómez

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Leandro Uribe Clavijo

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Medellín, Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín 050026, Colombia)

  • Andrés Felipe Orozco-Duque

    (Department of Applied Sciences, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Cl. 73 #76A-354, Medellín 050034, Colombia)

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology for implementing a custom-developed explainability model for credit rating using behavioral data registered during the lifecycle of the borrowing that can replicate the score given by the regulatory model for the solidarity economy in Colombia. The methodology integrates continuous behavioral and financial variables from over 17,000 real credit histories into predictive models based on ridge regression, decision trees, random forests, XGBoost, and LightGBM. The models were trained and evaluated using cross-validation and RMSE metrics. LightGBM emerged as the most accurate model, effectively capturing nonlinear credit behavior patterns. To ensure interpretability, SHAP was used to identify the contribution of each feature to the model predictions. The presented model using LightGBM predicted the credit risk assessment in accordance with the regulatory model used by the Colombian Superintendence of the Solidarity Economy, with a root-mean-square error of 0.272 and an R 2 score of 0.99. We propose an alternative framework using explainable machine learning models aligned with the internal ratings-based approach under Basel II. Our model integrates variables collected throughout the borrowing lifecycle, offering a more comprehensive perspective than the regulatory model. While the regulatory framework adjusts itself generically to national regulations, our approach explicitly accounts for borrower-specific dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • María Andrea Arias-Serna & Jhon Jair Quiza-Montealegre & Luis Fernando Móntes-Gómez & Leandro Uribe Clavijo & Andrés Felipe Orozco-Duque, 2025. "Explainable Machine Learning Models for Credit Rating in Colombian Solidarity Sector Entities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:489-:d:1740695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/489/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/489/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Jacobs, 2020. "A Holistic Model Validation Framework for Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Model Development and Implementation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-36, May.
    2. Gambacorta, Leonardo & Huang, Yiping & Qiu, Han & Wang, Jingyi, 2024. "How do machine learning and non-traditional data affect credit scoring? New evidence from a Chinese fintech firm," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fiorella De Fiore & Leonardo Gambacorta & Cristina Manea, 2023. "Big techs and the credit channel of monetary policy," BIS Working Papers 1088, Bank for International Settlements.
    2. Kowalewski, Oskar & Pisany, Paweł, 2022. "Banks' consumer lending reaction to fintech and bigtech credit emergence in the context of soft versus hard credit information processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Cornelli, Giulio & De Fiore, Fiorella & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Manea, Cristina, 2024. "Fintech vs bank credit: How do they react to monetary policy?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. Zhong, Changbiao & Zhang, Chao, 2024. "Can data elements enhance urban innovation? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Cornelli, Giulio & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Jagtiani, Julapa, 2024. "The impact of fintech lending on credit access for U.S. small businesses," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Huang, Yiping & Li, Zhenhua & Qiu, Han & Tao, Sun & Wang, Xue & Zhang, Longmei, 2023. "BigTech credit risk assessment for SMEs," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Tobias Berg & Andreas Fuster & Manju Puri, 2022. "FinTech Lending," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 187-207, November.
    8. Liu, Tao & Yu, Yanxin & Gong, Di & Guo, Min, 2024. "Geographic disparities in bank lending: Evidence from an auto loan market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Wang, Yichen & Hu, Jun & Chen, Jia, 2023. "Does Fintech facilitate cross-border M&As? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Hans Genberg & Özer Karagedikli, 2021. "Machine Learning and Central Banks: Ready for Prime Time?," Working Papers wp43, South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN) Research and Training Centre.
    11. Lei Lu & Jianxing Wei & Weixing Wu & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Pricing strategies in BigTech lending: Evidence from China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 333-374, June.
    12. Frederic Boissay & Torsten Ehlers & Leonardo Gambacorta & Hyun Song Shin, 2021. "Big Techs in Finance: On the New Nexus Between Data Privacy and Competition," Springer Books, in: Raghavendra Rau & Robert Wardrop & Luigi Zingales (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Technological Finance, pages 855-875, Springer.
    13. Allen, Franklin & Gu, Xian & Jagtiani, Julapa, 2022. "Fintech, Cryptocurrencies, and CBDC: Financial Structural Transformation in China," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    14. Oskar Kowalewski & Pawel Pisany & Emil Slazak, 2021. "What determines cross-country differences in fintech and bigtech credit markets?," Working Papers 2021-ACF-02, IESEG School of Management.
    15. Sergio Gorjón, 2020. "Digital platforms: developments in their regulation and challenges in the financial arena," Economic Bulletin, Banco de España, issue 4/2020.
    16. Salvatore Cardillo & Raffaele Gallo & Francesco Guarino, 2021. "Main challenges and prospects for the European banking sector: a critical review of the ongoing debate," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 634, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    17. Cecchetti, Stephen & Schoenholtz, Kermit L., 2020. "Finance and Technology: What is changing and what is not," CEPR Discussion Papers 15352, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Giulio Cornelli & Jon Frost & Leonardo Gambacorta & Raghavendra Rau & Robert Wardrop & Tania Ziegler, 2020. "Fintech and big tech credit: a new database," BIS Working Papers 887, Bank for International Settlements.
    19. Nicola Branzoli & Ilaria Supino, 2020. "FinTech credit: a critical review of empirical research," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 549, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    20. Martin Chorzempa & Yiping Huang, 2022. "Chinese Fintech Innovation and Regulation," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 17(2), pages 274-292, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:489-:d:1740695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.