IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i9p475-d1732626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI and Financial Fragility: A Framework for Measuring Systemic Risk in Deployment of Generative AI for Stock Price Predictions

Author

Listed:
  • Miranda McClellan

    (Schwarzman College, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

In a few years, most investment firms will deploy Generative AI (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) for reduced-cost stock trading decisions. If GenAI-run investment decisions from most firms are heavily coordinated, they could all give a “sell” signal simultaneously, triggering market crashes. Likewise, simultaneous “buy” signals from GenAI-run investment decisions could cause market bubbles with algorithmically inflated prices. In this way, coordinated actions from LLMs introduce systemic risk into the global financial system. Existing risk analysis for GenAI focuses on endogenous risk from model performance. In comparison, exogenous risk from external factors like macroeconomic changes, natural disasters, or sudden regulatory changes, is understudied. This research fills the gap by creating a framework for measuring exogenous (systemic) risk from LLMs acting in the stock trading system. This research develops a concrete, quantitative framework to understand the systemic risk brought by using GenAI in stock investment by measuring the covariance between LLM stock price predictions across three industries (technology, automobiles, and communications) produced by eight large language models developed across the United States, Europe, and China. This paper also identifies potential data-driven technical, cultural, and regulatory mechanisms for governing AI to prevent negative financial and societal consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Miranda McClellan, 2025. "AI and Financial Fragility: A Framework for Measuring Systemic Risk in Deployment of Generative AI for Stock Price Predictions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-40, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:475-:d:1732626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/475/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/9/475/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Henning & Siddhartha M. Ojha & Ross Spoon & Jiatong Han & Colin F. Camerer, 2025. "LLM Trading: Analysis of LLM Agent Behavior in Experimental Asset Markets," Papers 2502.15800, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    2. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Snidal, Duncan, 2000. "Hard and Soft Law in International Governance," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 421-456, July.
    3. Edwin J. Elton & Martin J. Gruber, 1997. "Modern Portfolio Theory, 1950 to Date," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 97-3, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.
    4. Nicola Cetorelli & Beverly Hirtle & Donald P. Morgan & Stavros Peristiani & João A. C. Santos, 2007. "Trends in financial market concentration and their implications for market stability," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 13(Mar), pages 33-51.
    5. Usman, Muhammad & Umar, Zaghum & Choi, Sun-Yong & Teplova, Tamara, 2024. "Quantifying endogenous and exogenous shocks to financial sector systemic risk: A comparison of GFC and COVID-19," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 281-293.
    6. Ian Johnstone & Joshua Lincoln, 2022. "Global Governance in an Era of Pluralism," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(4), pages 563-570, September.
    7. Babina, Tania & Fedyk, Anastassia & He, Alex & Hodson, James, 2024. "Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Elton, Edwin J. & Gruber, Martin J., 1997. "Modern portfolio theory, 1950 to date," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(11-12), pages 1743-1759, December.
    9. Ekkehart Boehmer & Charles M. Jones & Xiaoyan Zhang, 2013. "Shackling Short Sellers: The 2008 Shorting Ban," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(6), pages 1363-1400.
    10. Gai, Prasanna & Haldane, Andrew & Kapadia, Sujit, 2011. "Complexity, concentration and contagion," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 453-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Karp & Gary Van Vuuren, 2019. "Investment Implications Of The Fractal Market Hypothesis," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Samuel Tabot Enow, 2022. "Overreaction And Underreaction During The Covid-19 Pandemic In The South African Stock Market And Its Implications," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 10(1), pages 19-26.
    3. Pattitoni, Pierpaolo & Savioli, Marco, 2011. "Investment choices: Indivisible non-marketable assets and suboptimal solutions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2387-2394.
    4. Gregory Price & Warren Whatley, 2021. "Did profitable slave trading enable the expansion of empire?: The Asiento de Negros, the South Sea Company and the financial revolution in Great Britain," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 15(3), pages 675-718, September.
    5. Vasile BRĂTIAN, 2018. "Portfolio Optimization. Application of the Markowitz Model Using Lagrange and Profitability Forecast," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(1), pages 26-34.
    6. Jitka JANOVÁ, 2014. "Crop plan optimization under risk on a farm level in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(3), pages 123-132.
    7. Giorgio Arici & Marco Dalai & Riccardo Leonardi & Arnaldo Spalvieri, 2018. "A Communication Theoretic Interpretation of Modern Portfolio Theory Including Short Sales, Leverage and Transaction Costs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Jitka Janová, 2012. "Crop planning optimization model: the validation and verification processes," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(3), pages 451-462, September.
    9. Ying Zhang & Wikrom Prombutr & J. Andrew Hansz, 2024. "Real Estate Portfolio Diversification by Sectors Using a RAL Approach," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 121-136, July.
    10. Runhuan Feng & Hong Li & Ming Liu, 2025. "Robo-Advisors Beyond Automation: Principles and Roadmap for AI-Driven Financial Planning," Papers 2509.09922, arXiv.org.
    11. Pierpaolo Pattitoni & Marco Savioli, 2011. "Investment Choices: Indivisible non-Marketable Assets and Bounded Rationality," Working Paper series 07_11, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    12. Rodolfo Apreda, 2009. "An axiomatic treatment of enlarged separation portfolios and treasurer’s portfolios (with applications to financial synthetics)," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 398, Universidad del CEMA.
    13. Salo, Ahti & Doumpos, Michalis & Liesiö, Juuso & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2024. "Fifty years of portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 1-18.
    14. Rayna Tsaneva, 2013. "Characteristic features of the investment activities of the pension funds in Bulgaria," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 100-119.
    15. Kourtis, Apostolos & Dotsis, George & Markellos, Raphael N., 2012. "Parameter uncertainty in portfolio selection: Shrinking the inverse covariance matrix," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2522-2531.
    16. Kanzari, Dalel & Nakhli, Mohamed Sahbi & Gaies, Brahim & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2023. "Predicting macro-financial instability – How relevant is sentiment? Evidence from long short-term memory networks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Sujan Adhikari & Pawan Kumar Jha, Ph.D., 2016. "Applicability of Portfolio Theory in Nepali Stock Market," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Economic Research Department, vol. 28(1), pages 65-92, April.
    18. Christoph Wegener & Tobias Basse, 2019. "The Stability of Factor Sensitivities of German Stock Market Sector Indices: Empirical Evidence and Some Thoughts about Practical Implications," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-10, August.
    19. Vladimir Boginski & Sergiy Butenko & Oleg Shirokikh & Svyatoslav Trukhanov & Jaime Gil Lafuente, 2014. "A network-based data mining approach to portfolio selection via weighted clique relaxations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 216(1), pages 23-34, May.
    20. Aleksy Leeuwenkamp & Wentao Hu, 2023. "New general dependence measures: construction, estimation and application to high-frequency stock returns," Papers 2309.00025, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:475-:d:1732626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.