IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i7p345-d1684286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning Approaches to Credit Risk: Comparative Evidence from Participation and Conventional Banks in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Nesrine Gafsi

    (College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The current study examines the application of advanced machine learning (ML) techniques for forecasting credit risk in Islamic (participation) and traditional banks in the United Kingdom in 2010–2023. Leveraging an equally weighted panel dataset and guided by robust empirical literature, we integrate structural econometric modeling—i.e., the stochastic frontier approach (SFA) to measuring the Lerner index of market power—with current best-practice tree-based ML algorithms (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest) to predict non-performing loans (NPLs). The results show that bank-level financial performance measures, particularly loan ratio, profitability, and market power, outperform macroeconomic factors in forecasting credit risk. Among the models tested, CatBoost was more accurate and explainable, as confirmed by SHAP-based explainability analysis. The implications of the research have practical applications for risk managers, regulators, and policymakers in terms of valuing the explanatory power of explainable AI tools to enhance financial oversight and decision-making in post-crisis UK banking.

Suggested Citation

  • Nesrine Gafsi, 2025. "Machine Learning Approaches to Credit Risk: Comparative Evidence from Participation and Conventional Banks in the UK," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:345-:d:1684286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:345-:d:1684286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.