IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i3p148-d1610228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Firm Valuation: The Moderating Role of Audit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Mika Vaihekoski

    (Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland)

  • Habeeb Yahya

    (Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the external audit quality has an impact on the link between ESG performance and firm valuation using a sample of publicly listed Nordic firms. The results from a fixed-effect panel regression show that higher ESG scores lead to higher valuation when a Big Four audit firm is engaged as the external auditor, highlighting the impact of audit quality on the the reliability of the ESG evaluation. The finding highlights the importance of intense external audits in reinforcing investors’ confidence in ESG–firm valuation assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mika Vaihekoski & Habeeb Yahya, 2025. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Firm Valuation: The Moderating Role of Audit Quality," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:148-:d:1610228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    2. Limei Che & Ole-Kristian Hope & John Christian Langli, 2020. "How Big-4 Firms Improve Audit Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4552-4572, October.
    3. Aaron K. Chatterji & David I. Levine & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 125-169, March.
    4. José M. Moneva & Pablo Archel & Carmen Correa, 2006. "GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 121-137, June.
    5. Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington, 2008. "Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(12), pages 1325-1343, December.
    6. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    7. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    8. Eugene F. Fama, 2002. "Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, March.
    9. Kyunbeom Jeong, 2020. "The effect of audit quality on analyst following," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1798068-179, January.
    10. Pincus, Karen & Rusbarsky, Mark & Wong, Jilnaught, 1989. "Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 239-265.
    11. Raheja, Charu G., 2005. "Determinants of Board Size and Composition: A Theory of Corporate Boards," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 283-306, June.
    12. Elena Ferrer & Francisco J. López‐Arceiz & Cristina del Rio, 2020. "Sustainability disclosure and financial analysts' accuracy: The European case," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 2939-2952, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liwei Shan & Shihe Fu & Lu Zheng, 2017. "Corporate sexual equality and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1812-1826, September.
    2. Monica Billio & Michele Costola & Iva Hristova & Carmelo Latino & Loriana Pelizzon, 2021. "Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1426-1445, September.
    3. Li Cai & Jinhua Cui & Hoje Jo, 2016. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 563-594, December.
    4. Lars Kaiser, 2020. "ESG integration: value, growth and momentum," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 32-51, February.
    5. Cai, Ye & Sevilir, Merih, 2012. "Board connections and M&A transactions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 327-349.
    6. Mazzarano, Matteo & Guastella, Gianni & Pareglio, Stefano & Xepapadeas, Anastasios & Borghesi, Simone, 2024. "“Carbon” boards and transition risk: Explicit and implicit exposure implications for total stock returns and dividends payouts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Ling, Aifan & Li, Junxue & Wen, Limin & Zhang, Yi, 2023. "When trackers are aware of ESG: Do ESG ratings matter to tracking error portfolio performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Ioannis Oikonomou & Chris Brooks & Stephen Pavelin, 2014. "The Financial Effects of Uniform and Mixed Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 898-925, September.
    9. Maoliang Li & Ji Wu & Liansheng Zhang & Liping Zou, 2020. "Board reforms and the cost of equity: International evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(5), pages 4497-4531, December.
    10. Timo Busch & Maximilian Schnippering, 2022. "Corporate social and financial performance: Revisiting the role of innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 635-645, May.
    11. Gulraze Wakil, 2020. "Firm size proxies and the value relevance of predictive stock return models," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 44(3), pages 434-457, July.
    12. Ferreira, Daniel & Ferreira, Miguel A. & Raposo, Clara C., 2008. "Board Structure and Price Informativeness," CEI Working Paper Series 2008-4, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    13. Alfonso Mendoza-Velázquez & Luis Carlos Ortuño-Barba & Luis David Conde-Cortés, 2022. "Corporate governance and firm performance in hybrid model countries," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 32-58, February.
    14. Won-Kyu Lim & Cheong-Kyu Park, 2022. "Mandating Gender Diversity and the Value Relevance of Sustainable Development Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Kim, Sang-Joon & Bae, John & Oh, Hannah, 2019. "Financing strategically: The moderation effect of marketing activities on the bifurcated relationship between debt level and firm valuation of small and medium enterprises," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 663-681.
    16. Ng, Joe Cho Yiu & Leung, Charles Ka Yui & Chan, Suikang, 2022. "Corporate Real Estate Holding and Stock Returns: International Evidence from Listed Companies," MPRA Paper 111691, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lauren Cohen & Andrea Frazzini & Christopher J. Malloy, 2012. "Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of "Independent" Directors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1039-1058, June.
    18. Manhwa Wu & Paoyu Huang & Yensen Ni, 2020. "The Impact of Institutional Shareholdings on Price Limits," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 27(3), pages 343-361, September.
    19. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    20. Halit Gonenc & Bert Scholtens, 2019. "Responsibility and Performance Relationship in the Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-49, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:148-:d:1610228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.