IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i8p348-d881419.html

A Synergy Value Analysis of Sustainable Management Projects: Illustrated by the Example of the Aesthetic Medicine Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Tyrone T. Lin

    (Department of International Business, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97401, Taiwan)

  • Hui-Tzu Yen

    (Department of International Business, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97401, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Yen Hsu

    (Department of International Business, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97401, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study aims to construct a mathematical model to determine the dimensions of an economic, social, and environmental project with the goal of sustainable management. By identifying the optimal weights, the synergy values for sustainable management can be maximized. Taking aesthetic medicine companies as examples, this study attempts to construct the index projects of the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable management in an uncertain environment. Linear relationships (a combination of fixed synergistic values and varying synergistic values) are used to calculate the import optimal weight under optimistic, normal, and pessimistic circumstances. This study helped companies to introduce triple bottom line (TBL) indices to plan their issues under sustainable management and development, thus, enabling the parent company to achieve the optimal weight for the project costs to put in its subsidiaries. Additionally, this study prioritizes the weight of the influence on the management of the aesthetic medicine industry according to the risk probabilities, to minimize the uncertainties of risk management in corporate management and reduce the possibility of direct and indirect cost losses caused by financial distress, functional fluctuations, and negative impact on the medical equipment market, thereby maximizing the estimated total project value under sustainable management. This study constructs an aesthetic medicine-specific mathematical model concept using the triple bottom line model as the basis for sustainable corporate management and proposes an approach to obtain sustainable weight in uncertain conditions. By doing so, companies can add various managerial methods for the same industry, and new ideas are provided to the academic community to discuss the development of decision-making assessment criteria for risk assessments in sustainable management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tyrone T. Lin & Hui-Tzu Yen & Shu-Yen Hsu, 2022. "A Synergy Value Analysis of Sustainable Management Projects: Illustrated by the Example of the Aesthetic Medicine Industry," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:348-:d:881419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danso, Albert & Adomako, Samuel & Lartey, Theophilus & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Owusu-Yirenkyi, Diana, 2020. "Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 652-662.
    2. Hassini, Elkafi & Surti, Chirag & Searcy, Cory, 2012. "A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 69-82.
    3. Hermundsdottir, Fanny & Haneberg, Dag Håkon & Aspelund, Arild, 2022. "Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on environmental innovations in manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Frank Vanclay, 2004. "The Triple Bottom Line And Impact Assessment: How Do Tbl, Eia, Sia, Sea And Ems Relate To Each Other?," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 265-288.
    5. Sartori, Simone & Witjes, Sjors & Campos, Lucila M.S., 2017. "Sustainability performance for Brazilian electricity power industry: An assessment integrating social, economic and environmental issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    2. Marcos Carchano & Inmaculada Carrasco & Angela González, 2025. "Examining environmental proactivity in the Spanish wine industry: The moderating role of size," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 127-157, January.
    3. Mohsin Malik & Salam Abdallah, 2019. "Sustainability Initiatives in Emerging Economies: A Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Surajit Bag & Shivam Gupta, 2017. "Antecedents of Sustainable Innovation in Supplier Networks: A South African Experience," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(3), pages 231-250, September.
    5. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M. & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2019. "Modelling and analysis of intermodal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 281-297.
    6. Ying Shu & Xiaobin Zhuang & Rui Ying & Guanghua Xu, 2024. "Formal Institutional Pressure and the Integration of Corporate Environmental and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavily Polluting Industries in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Li, Mengfan & Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong & Yu, Yugang, 2025. "Green design and information sharing in a horizontally competitive supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Chun-Che Huang & Wen-Yau Liang & Shan-Ru Yi, 2017. "Cloud-based design for disassembly to create environmentally friendly products," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1203-1218, June.
    9. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Muhammad Irfan & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Maria Ghufran & Ghulam Yaseen & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Muhammad Bilal, 2024. "Analyzing the impact of organizational culture on social sustainability: a perspective of the construction industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1103-1133, January.
    11. Enrico Massaroni & Alessandra Cozzolino & Mario Calabrese & Ewa Wankowicz & Maura Fiore, 2016. "Reporting di sostenibilit? degli operatori logistici in Europa: analisi degli indicatori," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 303-334.
    12. Anup Kumar & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Avinash K. Shrivastava & Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Arjun Kumar A. Rathi, 2023. "Integration of the Standalone ‘Risk Assessment’ Section in Project Level Environmental Impact Assessment Reports for Value Addition: An Indian Case Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Brandenburg, Marcus & Govindan, Kannan & Sarkis, Joseph & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 299-312.
    15. Mirkouei, Amin & Haapala, Karl R. & Sessions, John & Murthy, Ganti S., 2017. "A review and future directions in techno-economic modeling and optimization of upstream forest biomass to bio-oil supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 15-35.
    16. Wondwosen Tilahun Bekele & Aschalew Degoma Durie & Abiot Tsegaye Kibret, 2025. "Unveiling the Power of Non-Technological Innovation Capability: Bridging Conventional and Emerging Strategic Orientations to Firm Performance—A SEM Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    17. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    18. Licheng Yang & Shijie Song & Chunlin Liu, 2024. "Green signals: The impact of environmental protection support policies on firms' green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3258-3278, May.
    19. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Wei, Wei & Han, Ying & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Ma, Jingjing & Chai, Shanglei, 2023. "Empirical study on the technical efficiency and total factor productivity of power industry: Evidence from Chinese provinces," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:348-:d:881419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.