IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v12y2024i2p43-d1389236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probability Distributions for Modeling Stock Market Returns—An Empirical Inquiry

Author

Listed:
  • Jayanta K. Pokharel

    (Department of Business Analytics & Actuarial Science, Siena College, Loudonville, NY 12211, USA)

  • Gokarna Aryal

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, IN 46323, USA)

  • Netra Khanal

    (Department of Mathematics, The University of Tampa, Tampa, FL 33606, USA)

  • Chris P. Tsokos

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA)

Abstract

Investing in stocks and shares is a common strategy to pursue potential gains while considering future financial needs, such as retirement and children’s education. Effectively managing investment risk requires thoroughly analyzing stock market returns and making informed predictions. Traditional models often utilize normal variance distributions to describe these returns. However, stock market returns often deviate from normality, exhibiting skewness, higher kurtosis, heavier tails, and a more pronounced center. This paper investigates the Laplace distribution and its generalized forms, including asymmetric Laplace, skewed Laplace, and the Kumaraswamy Laplace distribution, for modeling stock market returns. Our analysis involves a comparative study with the widely-used Variance-Gamma distribution, assessing their fit with the weekly returns of the S&P 500 Index and its eleven business sectors, drawing parallel inferences from international stock market indices like IBOVESPA and KOSPI for emerging and developed economies, as well as the 20+ Years Treasury Bond ETFs and individual stocks across varied time horizons. The empirical findings indicate the superior performance of the Kumaraswamy Laplace distribution, which establishes it as a robust alternative for precise return predictions and efficient risk mitigation in investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayanta K. Pokharel & Gokarna Aryal & Netra Khanal & Chris P. Tsokos, 2024. "Probability Distributions for Modeling Stock Market Returns—An Empirical Inquiry," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:43-:d:1389236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/2/43/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/2/43/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Poiraud-Casanova, Sandrine & Thomas-Agnan, Christine, 2000. "About monotone regression quantiles," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 101-104, May.
    2. William McGill, 1962. "Random fluctuations of response rate," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 27(1), pages 3-17, March.
    3. Durham, Garland B., 2007. "SV mixture models with application to S&P 500 index returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 822-856, September.
    4. Tomasz J. Kozubowski & Krzysztof Podgórski, 2000. "A Multivariate and Asymmetric Generalization of Laplace Distribution," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 531-540, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Kozubowski & Saralees Nadarajah, 2010. "Multitude of Laplace distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 127-148, January.
    2. Tsionas, Mike G. & Assaf, A. George & Andrikopoulos, Athanasios, 2020. "Quantile stochastic frontier models with endogeneity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Jensen, Mark J. & Maheu, John M., 2014. "Estimating a semiparametric asymmetric stochastic volatility model with a Dirichlet process mixture," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P3), pages 523-538.
    4. Rachid Belhachemi, 2024. "Option Valuation with Conditional Heteroskedastic Hidden Truncation Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2585-2601, June.
    5. Tony S. Wirjanto & Adam W. Kolkiewicz & Zhongxian Men, 2013. "Stochastic Conditional Duration Models with Mixture Processes," Working Paper series 29_13, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    6. Catania, Leopoldo & Luati, Alessandra, 2025. "Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 23-34.
    7. Roberto León-González, 2019. "Efficient Bayesian inference in generalized inverse gamma processes for stochastic volatility," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 899-920, September.
    8. Bretó, Carles & Veiga, Helena, 2011. "Forecasting volatility: does continuous time do better than discrete time?," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws112518, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    9. Leopoldo Catania & Alessandra Luati & Pierluigi Vallarino, 2021. "Economic vulnerability is state dependent," CREATES Research Papers 2021-09, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    10. Rombouts, Jeroen V.K. & Stentoft, Lars, 2015. "Option pricing with asymmetric heteroskedastic normal mixture models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 635-650.
    11. Rombouts, Jeroen V.K. & Stentoft, Lars, 2011. "Multivariate option pricing with time varying volatility and correlations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2267-2281, September.
    12. Jeongeun Kim & David S. Stoffer, 2008. "Fitting Stochastic Volatility Models in the Presence of Irregular Sampling via Particle Methods and the EM Algorithm," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 811-833, September.
    13. Kleppe, Tore Selland & Skaug, Hans Julius, 2012. "Fitting general stochastic volatility models using Laplace accelerated sequential importance sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3105-3119.
    14. Ma, Feng & Wang, Ruoxin & Lu, Xinjie & Wahab, M.I.M., 2021. "A comprehensive look at stock return predictability by oil prices using economic constraint approaches," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Aryal Gokarna & Zhang Qiuming, 2016. "Characterizations of Kumaraswamy Laplace Distribution with Applications," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 31(2), pages 59-70, December.
    16. Lin, Tiantian & Liu, Dehong & Zhang, Lili & Lung, Peter, 2019. "The information content of realized volatility of sector indices in China’s stock market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 625-640.
    17. Rombouts, Jeroen V.K. & Stentoft, Lars, 2014. "Bayesian option pricing using mixed normal heteroskedasticity models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 588-605.
    18. Akhter Mohiuddin Rather & V. N. Sastry & Arun Agarwal, 2017. "Stock market prediction and Portfolio selection models: a survey," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(3), pages 558-579, September.
    19. Ng, Jason & Forbes, Catherine S. & Martin, Gael M. & McCabe, Brendan P.M., 2013. "Non-parametric estimation of forecast distributions in non-Gaussian, non-linear state space models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 411-430.
    20. Wang, Yun & Xu, Houhua & Zou, Runmin & Zhang, Lingjun & Zhang, Fan, 2022. "A deep asymmetric Laplace neural network for deterministic and probabilistic wind power forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 497-517.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:43-:d:1389236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.