IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v12y2024i1p18-d1338750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Investor Attention and Accounting Information Comparability on Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Li Zhao

    (International College of Digital Innovation, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    School of Business, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China)

  • Nathee Naktnasukanjn

    (International College of Digital Innovation, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Ahmad Yahya Dawod

    (International College of Digital Innovation, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Bin Zhang

    (School of Business, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China)

Abstract

The efficient capital markets hypothesis (EMH) posits that security prices incorporate all available information in capital markets. Nevertheless, real stock markets often exhibit speculative behavior due to information asymmetry and the limited rationality of investors. This paper employs statistical analysis, a multiple regression approach, and robustness tests to investigate the impact of investor attention and accounting information comparability on stock returns. We collected monthly data from all Chinese A-share stocks listed on the main board of the Shanghai Stock Exchange for the period 2017–2021. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation between current investor attention and current monthly stock returns and a significant negative correlation between lagged investor attention and current monthly stock returns. Moreover, accounting information comparability serves as a substantial moderator, amplifying the positive effect of current investor attention on current stock returns and mitigating the negative impact of lagged investor attention. We investigate the indicator of accounting information comparability from the perspective of investor attention. Significantly, we use accounting information comparability as a moderating variable for the first time to assess its influence on stock returns. Our results demonstrate that accounting information comparability significantly contributes to mitigating excessive share price declines and stimulating share price increases. This discovery also acts as an internal driver for listed companies to proactively improve accounting information comparability.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Zhao & Nathee Naktnasukanjn & Ahmad Yahya Dawod & Bin Zhang, 2024. "Impacts of Investor Attention and Accounting Information Comparability on Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:18-:d:1338750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/1/18/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/1/18/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nian Li & Chunling Li & Runsen Yuan & Muhammad Asif Khan & Xiaoran Sun & Nosherwan Khaliq, 2021. "Investor Attention and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Web Search Volume Index of Chinese Listed Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Richard Frankel & Jared Jennings & Joshua Lee, 2022. "Disclosure Sentiment: Machine Learning vs. Dictionary Methods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5514-5532, July.
    3. G. Andrew Karolyi & Dawoon Kim & Rose Liao, 2020. "The Theory and Practice of Investor Relations: A Global Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4746-4771, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dasgupta, Amil & Fos, Vyacheslav & Sautner, Zacharias, 2021. "Institutional investors and corporate governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112114, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Kao, Lanfeng & Chen, Anlin & Lu, Cheng-Shou, 2022. "Retail investor attention and IPO prices with a pre-IPO market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 416-432.
    3. Dmitry Bazhutov & André Betzer & Francois Brochet & Markus Doumet & Peter Limbach, 2023. "The Supply and Effectiveness of Investor Relations in Insider- vs. Outsider-Oriented Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 660-683, January.
    4. Ryan P. McDonough, 2023. "Corporate communication and shareholder base retention: evidence from spin-offs," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1283-1327, May.
    5. Kirtac, Kemal & Germano, Guido, 2024. "Sentiment trading with large language models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122592, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Reiter, Nayana, 2021. "Investor communication and the benefits of cross-listing," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    7. Qi, Zhen & Chu, Chien-Chi & Zhou, Yixiao & Chen, Jian, 2022. "Corporate site visits and firm performance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 598-608.
    8. Fabozzi, Francesco A. & Nazemi, Abdolreza, 2023. "News-based sentiment and the value premium," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Neukirchen, Daniel & Engelhardt, Nils & Krause, Miguel & Posch, Peter N., 2023. "The value of (private) investor relations during the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Liu, Qingfu & Shi, Chen & Tse, Yiuman & Wang, Chuanjie, 2023. "The value of communication during pandemics," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Düsterhöft, Maximilian & Schiemann, Frank & Walther, Thomas, 2023. "Let’s talk about risk! Stock market effects of risk disclosure for European energy utilities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    12. Nils Engelhardt & Jens Ekkenga & Peter Posch, 2021. "ESG Ratings and Stock Performance during the COVID-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Hope, Ole-Kristian & Huang, Zhongwei & Moldovan, Rucsandra, 2021. "Wall Street analysts as investor relations officers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Xiaoxu Ling & Siyuan Yan & Louis T. W. Cheng, 2022. "Investor relations under short‐selling pressure: Evidence from strategic signaling by company site visits," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7-8), pages 1145-1174, July.
    15. Fengyan Wang & Ziyuan Sun & Hua Feng, 2022. "Can Media Attention Promote Green Innovation of Chinese Enterprises? Regulatory Effect of Environmental Regulation and Green Finance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Xiao, Lin & Ye, Yong & Luo, Runmei, 2023. "The diligent effect of investor relation officers in conference calls: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Ruxandra-Ioana Curea-Pitorac & Vasile-Petru Hategan, 2020. "Responsible Communication of Romanian Companies for Ensuring Public Health in a COVID-19 Pandemic Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Blessing Makwambeni & Brighton Matsika, 2022. "Toward Symmetry: An Assessment of Stockholder Communication Practices in South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    19. Shilei Yu & Ning Hu & Wanyi Chen, 2023. "The value of communication: Evidence from in‐depth investor relations management data," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 3873-3909, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:18-:d:1338750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.