IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v11y2023i4p123-d1263905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bibliometric Analysis of the FinTech Agility Literature: Evolution and Review

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelkebir Sahid

    (SIAD Laboratory, ENCG Settat, Hassan 1st University, Settat 26000, Morocco)

  • Yassine Maleh

    (LaSTI Laboratory, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal 25000, Morocco)

  • Shahram Atashi Asemanjerdi

    (Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis is crucial in understanding the evolution of research trends and knowledge in various fields. This study applies bibliometric analysis to explore the growth of the research paradigm on agility in the FinTech literature, using co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling of selected articles. Based on this bibliometric analysis, the evolution of research on agility in the FinTech domain has been prepared, focusing on the literature related to FinTech agility between 1984 and 2022. In this study, we also address the limitations of individual analyses from Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) and propose a comprehensive approach by merging the two research databases. The results reveal significant disparities between authors, publication influences, and keyword occurrences between the WOS and merged databases. Our research highlights the importance of combining a database approach in bibliometric studies, providing valuable insights for scholars, researchers, and stakeholders. Finally, the in-depth bibliometric analysis demonstrates the significance of “FinTech agility” in the rapidly evolving FinTech sector. Financial technology companies’ agility, or ability to adapt quickly, is the foundation of their success and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelkebir Sahid & Yassine Maleh & Shahram Atashi Asemanjerdi & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the FinTech Agility Literature: Evolution and Review," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:123-:d:1263905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/4/123/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/4/123/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Saïd Echchakoui, 2020. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 165-184, September.
    3. Taewon Hwang & Sung Tae Kim, 2019. "Balancing in-house and outsourced logistics services: effects on supply chain agility and firm performance," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 531-556, September.
    4. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Pandey, Neeraj & Pandey, Nitesh & Mishra, Akanksha, 2021. "Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 758-773.
    5. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1977. "Social irresponsibility in management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 185-213, September.
    6. Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans, 2010. "Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2389-2404, December.
    7. John Mingers & Evangelia A. E. C. G. Lipitakis, 2010. "Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(2), pages 613-625, November.
    8. Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans, 2010. "Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2389-2404, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Andrés Fazio, Salvador & Urquía Grande, Elena & Pérez Estébanez, Raquel, 2022. "The “secret life” of the Statement of Cash Flow: A bibliometric analysis," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    2. Jan Lampe & Priscilla Sarai Kraft & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Mapping the Field of Research on Entrepreneurial Organizations (1937–2016): A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 784-816, July.
    3. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    4. Guan-Can Yang & Gang Li & Chun-Ya Li & Yun-Hua Zhao & Jing Zhang & Tong Liu & Dar-Zen Chen & Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2015. "Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1319-1346, December.
    5. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Nina Sakinah Ahmad Rofaie & Seuk Wai Phoong & Muzalwana Abdul Talib & Ainin Sulaiman, 2023. "Light-emitting diode (LED) research: A bibliometric analysis during 2003–2018," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 173-191, February.
    7. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    8. Rey-Long Liu, 2017. "A new bibliographic coupling measure with descriptive capability," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 915-935, February.
    9. Yulei Xie & Ling Ji & Beibei Zhang & Gordon Huang, 2018. "Evolution of the Scientific Literature on Input–Output Analysis: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1990–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Chris W. Belter, 2013. "A bibliometric analysis of NOAA’s Office of Ocean Exploration and Research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 629-644, May.
    12. Ding, Ying, 2011. "Community detection: Topological vs. topical," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 498-514.
    13. Xinhai Liu & Wolfgang Glänzel & Bart De Moor, 2011. "Hybrid clustering of multi-view data via Tucker-2 model and its application," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 819-839, September.
    14. Yu-Wei Chang & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Chiao-Wen Lin, 2015. "Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2071-2087, December.
    15. Paul Donner, 2021. "Validation of the Astro dataset clustering solutions with external data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1619-1645, February.
    16. Xuefeng Wang & Shuo Zhang & Yuqin liu, 2022. "ITGInsight–discovering and visualizing research fronts in the scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6509-6531, November.
    17. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    19. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Li, Heyang & Wu, Meijun & Wang, Yougui & Zeng, An, 2022. "Bibliographic coupling networks reveal the advantage of diversification in scientific projects," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:123-:d:1263905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.