IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v11y2023i4p123-d1263905.html

A Bibliometric Analysis of the FinTech Agility Literature: Evolution and Review

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelkebir Sahid

    (SIAD Laboratory, ENCG Settat, Hassan 1st University, Settat 26000, Morocco)

  • Yassine Maleh

    (LaSTI Laboratory, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal 25000, Morocco)

  • Shahram Atashi Asemanjerdi

    (Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis is crucial in understanding the evolution of research trends and knowledge in various fields. This study applies bibliometric analysis to explore the growth of the research paradigm on agility in the FinTech literature, using co-citation analysis and bibliographic coupling of selected articles. Based on this bibliometric analysis, the evolution of research on agility in the FinTech domain has been prepared, focusing on the literature related to FinTech agility between 1984 and 2022. In this study, we also address the limitations of individual analyses from Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) and propose a comprehensive approach by merging the two research databases. The results reveal significant disparities between authors, publication influences, and keyword occurrences between the WOS and merged databases. Our research highlights the importance of combining a database approach in bibliometric studies, providing valuable insights for scholars, researchers, and stakeholders. Finally, the in-depth bibliometric analysis demonstrates the significance of “FinTech agility” in the rapidly evolving FinTech sector. Financial technology companies’ agility, or ability to adapt quickly, is the foundation of their success and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelkebir Sahid & Yassine Maleh & Shahram Atashi Asemanjerdi & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the FinTech Agility Literature: Evolution and Review," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:123-:d:1263905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/4/123/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/4/123/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Mingers & Evangelia A. E. C. G. Lipitakis, 2010. "Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(2), pages 613-625, November.
    2. Taewon Hwang & Sung Tae Kim, 2019. "Balancing in-house and outsourced logistics services: effects on supply chain agility and firm performance," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 531-556, September.
    3. Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans, 2010. "Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2389-2404, December.
    4. Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans, 2010. "Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(12), pages 2389-2404, December.
    5. Armstrong, J. Scott, 1977. "Social irresponsibility in management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 185-213, September.
    6. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    7. Saïd Echchakoui, 2020. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 165-184, September.
    8. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Pandey, Neeraj & Pandey, Nitesh & Mishra, Akanksha, 2021. "Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 758-773.
    9. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prodia Nur Kemala & Deddy Priatmodjo Koesrindartoto & Dzikri Firmansyah Hakam, 2026. "Advancing inclusive finance through financial technology (FinTech): peer-to-peer (P2P) and digital lending as catalyst for financial inclusion," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Francesc Prior Sanz & Francesc Martori Adrian, 2025. "Mapping innovation tools and financial inclusion: a bibliometric analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-36, December.
    3. Libina Babu & Gireesh Kumar G S, 2025. "Exploring User Acceptance of Fintech Innovations: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Models and Empirical Studies," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 17(1), pages 71-91, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    2. repec:ehu:cuader:55444 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Shaunak Roy & Shivaji Banerjee, 2025. "Trajectories of Brand Personality Research since the New Millennium: A Bibliometric Analysis," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 14(2), pages 151-172, March.
    4. Verma, Sushma & Shome, Samik & Hassan, M. Kabir, 2023. "FinTech in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A review and future research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 950-971.
    5. Jan Lampe & Priscilla Sarai Kraft & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Mapping the Field of Research on Entrepreneurial Organizations (1937–2016): A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 784-816, July.
    6. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    7. Zhen Liu & Lingfeng Ren & Chang Xiao & Ke Zhang & Peter Demian, 2022. "Virtual Reality Aided Therapy towards Health 4.0: A Two-Decade Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Samik Shome & Sushma Verma, 2025. "Zombie firms: a systematic review and future research directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 2309-2368, September.
    9. Victor Tiberius & Meike Rietz & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2020. "Performance Analysis and Science Mapping of Institutional Entrepreneurship Research," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Sofia Aparisi-Torrijo & Gabriela Ribes-Giner, 2022. "Female entrepreneurial leadership factors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1707-1737, December.
    11. Twinkle Verma & Baldeep Singh, 2026. "Effect of Incentives on Green Car Adoption: A Three-tier Approach of Review," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 33-51, April.
    12. repec:ehu:cuader:56544 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Emili Vizuete-Luciano & Oktay Güzel & José M. Merigó, 2023. "Bibliometric research of the Pay-What-You-Want Topic," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 413-426, October.
    14. Noelia Salido-Andres & Nuria Garcia-Rodriguez & Silvia Cachero-Martinez, 2022. "Connecting Social Enterprises and Sustainable Consumption: Systematic Review, Bibliometric Analysis, and Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Yuk Ming Tang & Ka Yin Chau, 2025. "Blockchain evolution and management theoretical (BEMT) model based on integrated semantic similarity and co-citation analysis for next generation service industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 475-494, June.
    16. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    17. Guan-Can Yang & Gang Li & Chun-Ya Li & Yun-Hua Zhao & Jing Zhang & Tong Liu & Dar-Zen Chen & Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2015. "Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1319-1346, December.
    18. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.
    21. Nina Sakinah Ahmad Rofaie & Seuk Wai Phoong & Muzalwana Abdul Talib & Ainin Sulaiman, 2023. "Light-emitting diode (LED) research: A bibliometric analysis during 2003–2018," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 173-191, February.
    22. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:123-:d:1263905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.