IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfb/journl/v17y2025i1p71-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring User Acceptance of Fintech Innovations: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Models and Empirical Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Libina Babu
  • Gireesh Kumar G S

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a systematic review and bibliometric analysis aimed at exploring theoretical models and empirical studies on user acceptance of fintech innovations. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 58 studies published after 2020 were identified through a comprehensive search of the Scopus database. The literature reflects a strong reliance on established models, such as the Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology; and extensions of these theories/models included study variables such as trust, perceived risk and regulatory impacts. Empirical findings consistently highlight perceived usefulness, ease of use, trustworthiness, and the regulatory environment as important factors that affect user acceptance in a variety of Fintech domains, including mobile payments. The review emphasizes the importance of contextual factors, the perceptions of the users, and the regulatory framework in the driving influence of acceptance behavior. Such longitudinal studies, combined with the examination of emerging fintech innovations, will lead to a further richness of theoretical frameworks and applied practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Libina Babu & Gireesh Kumar G S, 2025. "Exploring User Acceptance of Fintech Innovations: A Systematic Review of Theoretical Models and Empirical Studies," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 17(1), pages 71-91, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfb:journl:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:71-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rfb.ase.ro/articole/RFB_2025V1_art_5.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfb:journl:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:71-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tatu Lucian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.