IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1428-d1748545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Maren Wright Voss

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Cal J. Halvorsen

    (Center for Work, Health, and Wellbeing, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
    Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Kanchan Yadav

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Stephanie M. Neidlinger

    (Department of Work, Organizational, and Business Psychology, Helmut-Schmidt University, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Gregory R. Wagner

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Susan E. Peters

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Center for Work, Health, and Wellbeing, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

As life expectancy and retirement ages rise globally, understanding how older workers thrive in the workplace is an increasingly vital measurement and wellbeing priority. In this study, we validated the Thriving from Work Questionnaire (TfWQ) for workers aged ≥50. A U.S. online panel yielded 617 older workers and 372 younger counterparts for comparison. Using item response theory alongside model-fit evaluation and correlational tests with job/life satisfaction, engagement, burnout, and turnover intent—we assessed reliability and construct validity of the long- (30 reduced to 29-item) and short- (8-item) form TfWQ versions. We recommend omitting one of the original items from the long-form for use in older workers. Instrument reliability was high (α = 0.94 long-form; 0.90 short-form). Model fit was established for both long- and short-form versions with acceptable model fit indices. Convergent validity was supported by strong, theory-consistent correlations with the external constructs. Older workers, compared with those 20–49 years, had higher scores of thriving from work as well as differences identified on nine items. These age-patterned differences highlight actionable levers for occupational-health age-sensitive policy, wellbeing interventions, and workforce planning. The TfWQ offers a robust, reliable, valid, and practically oriented tool for evaluating older workers’ wellbeing with utility across research, practice, and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Maren Wright Voss & Cal J. Halvorsen & Kanchan Yadav & Stephanie M. Neidlinger & Gregory R. Wagner & Susan E. Peters, 2025. "Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1428-:d:1748545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1428/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1428/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. Schulte & George Delclos & Sarah A. Felknor & L. Casey Chosewood, 2019. "Toward an Expanded Focus for Occupational Safety and Health: A Commentary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Alicia H. Munnell & Matthew S. Rutledge & Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher, 2019. "Retiring Earlier than Planned: What Matters Most?," Issues in Brief ib2019-3, Center for Retirement Research.
    3. N. Keating, 2022. "A research framework for the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021–2030)," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 775-787, September.
    4. Albert Maydeu-Olivares & Harry Joe, 2006. "Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 713-732, December.
    5. Carina Cornesse & Annelies G. Blom, 2023. "Response Quality in Nonprobability and Probability-based Online Panels," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 52(2), pages 879-908, May.
    6. Bethany Croak & Laura E Grover & Simon Wessely & Kalpa Kharicha & Danielle Lamb & Sharon AM Stevelink, 2025. "Relative income and its relationship with mental health in UK employees: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Susan E. Peters & Glorian Sorensen & Jeffrey N. Katz & Daniel A. Gundersen & Gregory R. Wagner, 2021. "Thriving from Work: Conceptualization and Measurement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Piotr Bialowolski & Matthew T. Lee & Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska & Ying Chen & Richard G. Cowden & Eileen McNeely & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2023. "Differences in Multi-Dimensional Well-Being Among Factory Workers: Evidence from Six Countries," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(5), pages 2159-2180, October.
    9. Diego Gómez-Baya & Ana M. Lucia-Casademunt & José A. Salinas-Pérez, 2018. "Gender Differences in Psychological Well-Being and Health Problems among European Health Professionals: Analysis of Psychological Basic Needs and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Palan, Stefan & Schitter, Christian, 2018. "Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 22-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara L. Tamers & Jessica M. K. Streit & Casey Chosewood, 2022. "Promising Occupational Safety, Health, and Well-Being Approaches to Explore the Future of Work in the USA: An Editorial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Paul A. Schulte & George L. Delclos & Sarah A. Felknor & Jessica M. K. Streit & Michelle McDaniel & L. Casey Chosewood & Lee S. Newman & Faiyaz A. Bhojani & Rene Pana-Cryan & Naomi G. Swanson, 2022. "Expanding the Focus of Occupational Safety and Health: Lessons from a Series of Linked Scientific Meetings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Ni, Dan & Jiwen Song, Lynda & Zheng, Xiaoming & Zhu, Jinlong & Zhang, Mengyi & Xu, Lingxiao, 2022. "Extending a helping hand: How receiving gratitude makes a difference in employee performance during a crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 967-982.
    4. Julie Bayle-Cordier & Loïc Berger & Rayan Elatmani & Massimo Tavoni, 2023. "Breath, Love, Walk? The Impact of Mindfulness Interventions on Climate Policy Support and Environmental Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Rosa Montaño, 2013. "How Should We Assess the Fit of Rasch-Type Models? Approximating the Power of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics in Categorical Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 116-133, January.
    6. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Georg D. Granic, 2023. "Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(3), pages 499-521, July.
    7. Aksoy, Billur & Chadd, Ian & Koh, Boon Han, 2023. "Sexual identity, gender, and anticipated discrimination in prosocial behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Huber, Christoph & Huber, Jürgen, 2020. "Bad bankers no more? Truth-telling and (dis)honesty in the finance industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 472-493.
    9. Eva Wanek & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Alda Mari, 2024. "Desire, moral evaluation or sense of duty: The modal framing of stated preference elicitation," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(4), pages 434-459, August.
    10. Calvin Thigpen & Kelcie Ralph & Nicholas J. Klein & Anne Brown, 2023. "Can information increase support for transportation reform? Results from an experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 893-912, June.
    11. Patrizia Sulis & Paola Proietti, 2024. "Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1650-1665, September.
    12. Japutra, Arnold & Septianto, Felix & Can, Ali Selcuk, 2022. "Feeling grateful versus happy? The effects of emotional appeals in advertisements on self-made products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Vassilis Vasdekis & Silvia Cagnone & Irini Moustaki, 2012. "A Composite Likelihood Inference in Latent Variable Models for Ordinal Longitudinal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 425-441, July.
    14. Prince Destiny Ugo, 2017. "Project Quality Management Performance: An Insight to Sustainable Development Initiatives in Oil and Gas Host Communities," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 76-88, December.
    15. Chen, Yunxiao & Moustaki, Irini & Zhang, H, 2020. "A note on likelihood ratio tests for models with latent variables," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Dickinson, David L., 2020. "Deliberation Enhances the Confirmation Bias: An Examination of Politics and Religion," IZA Discussion Papers 13241, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Keller, Elena & Ortmann, Andreas & Chambers, Georgina Mary, 2024. "Exploring the demand for elective egg freezing: A laboratory experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Can, Ali Selcuk & Ekinci, Yuksel & Pino, Giovanni, 2021. "Joint brand advertising for emerging heritage sites," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Billur Aksoy & Christopher S. Carpenter & Dario Sansone, 2025. "Understanding Labor Market Discrimination Against Transgender People: Evidence from a Double List Experiment and a Survey," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 659-677, January.
    20. Annika Hillebrandt & Daniel L. Brady & Maria Francisca Saldanha & Laurie J. Barclay, 2023. "The Paradox of Paranoia: How One’s Own Self-Interested Unethical Behavior Can Spark Paranoia and Reduce Affiliative Behavior Toward Coworkers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 159-173, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1428-:d:1748545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.