IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1428-d1748545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Maren Wright Voss

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Cal J. Halvorsen

    (Center for Work, Health, and Wellbeing, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
    Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Kanchan Yadav

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Stephanie M. Neidlinger

    (Department of Work, Organizational, and Business Psychology, Helmut-Schmidt University, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Gregory R. Wagner

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Susan E. Peters

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Center for Work, Health, and Wellbeing, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

As life expectancy and retirement ages rise globally, understanding how older workers thrive in the workplace is an increasingly vital measurement and wellbeing priority. In this study, we validated the Thriving from Work Questionnaire (TfWQ) for workers aged ≥50. A U.S. online panel yielded 617 older workers and 372 younger counterparts for comparison. Using item response theory alongside model-fit evaluation and correlational tests with job/life satisfaction, engagement, burnout, and turnover intent—we assessed reliability and construct validity of the long- (30 reduced to 29-item) and short- (8-item) form TfWQ versions. We recommend omitting one of the original items from the long-form for use in older workers. Instrument reliability was high (α = 0.94 long-form; 0.90 short-form). Model fit was established for both long- and short-form versions with acceptable model fit indices. Convergent validity was supported by strong, theory-consistent correlations with the external constructs. Older workers, compared with those 20–49 years, had higher scores of thriving from work as well as differences identified on nine items. These age-patterned differences highlight actionable levers for occupational-health age-sensitive policy, wellbeing interventions, and workforce planning. The TfWQ offers a robust, reliable, valid, and practically oriented tool for evaluating older workers’ wellbeing with utility across research, practice, and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Maren Wright Voss & Cal J. Halvorsen & Kanchan Yadav & Stephanie M. Neidlinger & Gregory R. Wagner & Susan E. Peters, 2025. "Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1428-:d:1748545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1428/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1428/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1428-:d:1748545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.