IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p174-d1012011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study of Grassroots Water Conservancy Services Evaluation and Obstacle Factors Diagnosis Based on Gray Correlation-TOPSIS Model in Hunan Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Zhang

    (Hunan Institute of Water Resourses and Hydropower Research, Changsha 410011, China)

  • Zihao Tang

    (Hunan Institute of Water Resourses and Hydropower Research, Changsha 410011, China
    School of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China)

  • Bin Deng

    (School of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China
    Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco-Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China)

  • Siyan Liu

    (Hunan Institute of Water Resourses and Hydropower Research, Changsha 410011, China)

  • Yifei Xiang

    (College of Artificial Intelligence, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530006, China)

Abstract

Based on the evaluation model of the gray correlation-TOPSIS method, this paper examines the index system of grass-roots water conservancy services in Hunan Province, China. This paper aims at the present situation of grassroots water conservancy in Hunan province, which assisted it in developing grassroots water conservancy services. The evaluation indicators include five criteria levels (institutional staffing, personnel quality, management level, public policy and service capacity) and twenty-four indicator levels. In this paper, the weight calculation method combined with an analytic hierarchy process and an entropy weight method, as well as quantitative and qualitative methods, was used to conduct an empirical study on the basic water conservancy service level of Hunan Province in 2020. The results classify grassroots water services in Hunan Province into three levels. By fitting the GDP of cities and prefectures with the comprehensive closeness, we conclude that there is considerable convergence between the grassroots water conservancy service level of Hunan Province and its local economic level. The more developed the economy, the higher the grassroots water conservancy service level. In addition, through obstacle factor analysis, the main constraints of grassroots water conservancy in various cities and prefectures are obtained. Therefore, the grassroots water conservancy service’s ability can be comprehensively improved from three aspects: serviceability, capital investment, and talent construction. This indicator system can promote the overall governance capacity of grassroots water conservancy in the future development of cities and prefectures, and it can also provide Hunan with experience and case examples for the implementation of rural revitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Zhang & Zihao Tang & Bin Deng & Siyan Liu & Yifei Xiang, 2022. "A Case Study of Grassroots Water Conservancy Services Evaluation and Obstacle Factors Diagnosis Based on Gray Correlation-TOPSIS Model in Hunan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:174-:d:1012011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Haoyang & Wang, Sufen & Hao, Xinmei, 2017. "An Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 324-337.
    2. Cai, Ximing & McKinney, Daene C. & Rosegrant, Mark W., 2003. "Sustainability analysis for irrigation water management in the Aral Sea region," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 1043-1066, June.
    3. Pawlak, Zdzisaw & Sowinski, Roman, 1994. "Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 443-459, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenglong Zhang & Qiong Yue & Ping Guo, 2019. "A Nonlinear Inexact Two-Stage Management Model for Agricultural Water Allocation under Uncertainty Based on the Heihe River Water Diversion Plan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    3. Sholpan Saimova & Gulsim Makenova & Aizhan Skakova & Aitolkyn Moldagaliyeva & Ardak Beisembinova & Zhamilya Berdiyarova & Bagdagul Imanbekova, 2020. "Towards a Low-carbon Economic Sustainable Development: Scenarios and Policies for Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 638-646.
    4. Abrahao, R. & Causapé, J. & García-Garizábal, I. & Merchán, D., 2011. "Implementing irrigation: Salt and nitrate exported from the Lerma basin (Spain)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 105-112.
    5. Azam, Nouman & Zhang, Yan & Yao, JingTao, 2017. "Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 704-714.
    6. Zaras, Kazimierz, 2001. "Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 305-314, April.
    7. Pawlak, Zdzislaw, 1997. "Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 48-57, May.
    8. Chikalov, Igor & Hussain, Shahid & Moshkov, Mikhail, 2018. "Bi-criteria optimization of decision trees with applications to data analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 689-701.
    9. Qiang Yang & Ping-an Du & Yong Wang & Bin Liang, 2018. "Developing a rough set based approach for group decision making based on determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 757-779, October.
    10. Hu, Qiwei & Chakhar, Salem & Siraj, Sajid & Labib, Ashraf, 2017. "Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1136-1163.
    11. Lin, Rong-Ho, 2012. "An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 55-61.
    12. Salvatore Barbagallo & Simona Consoli & Nello Pappalardo & Salvatore Greco & Santo Zimbone, 2006. "Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, February.
    13. Michailidis, Anastasios & Nastis, Stefanos A. & Loizou, Efstratios & Mattas, Konstadinos, 2010. "The adoption of water saving irrigation practices in the Region of West Macedonia," 120th Seminar, September 2-4, 2010, Chania, Crete 109388, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2004. "Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 271-292, October.
    15. Walaa El-Nashar & Ahmed Elyamany, 2023. "Adapting Irrigation Strategies to Mitigate Climate Change Impacts: A Value Engineering Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(6), pages 2369-2386, May.
    16. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    17. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    18. Liming Yao & Jiuping Xu & Yifan Li, 2014. "Evaluation of the Efficiency of Low Carbon Industrialization in Cultural and Natural Heritage: Taking Leshan as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Motamed, Mesbah J. & Arriola, Christine & Hansen, James & MacDonald, Stephen, 2013. "Cotton and Hydropower in Central Asia: How Resource Competition Affects Trade," Economic Information Bulletin 262128, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Djanibekov, Nodir & Sommer, Rolf & Djanibekov, Utkur, 2013. "Evaluation of effects of cotton policy changes on land and water use in Uzbekistan: Application of a bio-economic farm model at the level of a water users association," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:174-:d:1012011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.