IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13821-d951622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and Measurement of Barriers to Green Transformation Behavior of Resource Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Cunfang Li

    (School of Business, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Road, Copper Mt. District, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Tao Song

    (School of Business, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Road, Copper Mt. District, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Wenfu Wang

    (School of Business, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Road, Copper Mt. District, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Xinyi Gu

    (School of Business, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Road, Copper Mt. District, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Zhan Li

    (School of Business, Jiangsu Normal University, No. 101 Shanghai Road, Copper Mt. District, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Yongzeng Lai

    (Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada)

Abstract

To effectively guide and stimulate the green transformation behavior of resource industries and promote the sustainable and high-quality development of the region, it is necessary to deeply analyze and clarify the barrier factors of the green transformation behavior of resource industries. This study measures the green transformation efficiency of the resource industries by selecting the panel data of the mining industry from 29 Chinese provinces, based on the DEA-SBM model, and employing the ideas and methods of system engineering, for the years 2012–2019. Hence, the study employs the Tobit model to verify the factors that hinder the green transformation behavior of the resource industries. The results show that the (1) resource industries’ barriers against the green transformation behavior form a significant barrier effect by inhibiting the efficiency of green transformation; (2) there is a difference in the intensity of the effect of the resource industries’ barriers to the green transformation behavior; (3) regional heterogeneity exists in the effects of the barriers to the green transformation behavior of the resource industries. The findings of the study can provide a scientific basis for further improving the effectiveness of policies related to the green transformation behavior of resource industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Cunfang Li & Tao Song & Wenfu Wang & Xinyi Gu & Zhan Li & Yongzeng Lai, 2022. "Analysis and Measurement of Barriers to Green Transformation Behavior of Resource Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13821-:d:951622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13821/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13821/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Éléonore Lèbre & Glen Corder & Artem Golev, 2017. "The Role of the Mining Industry in a Circular Economy: A Framework for Resource Management at the Mine Site Level," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 662-672, June.
    2. Wang, Wei & Wu, Fengping & Li, Cunfang, 2021. "Relationship between cross-regional transfer and the environment based on the coal enterprises in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    4. Padmore, Tim & Gibson, Hervey, 1998. "Modelling systems of innovation: II. A framework for industrial cluster analysis in regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 625-641, February.
    5. He, Zhengxia & Cao, Changshuai & Kuai, Leyi & Zhou, Yanqing & Wang, Jianming, 2022. "Impact of policies on wind power innovation at different income levels: Regional differences in China based on dynamic panel estimation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Li, Cunfang & Li, Danping & Dong, Mei, 2019. "The spillage effect of the transfer behavior of coal resource-exhausted enterprises and science and technology projects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 385-396.
    7. Li, Cunfang & Zhang, Bo & Lai, Yongzeng & Dong, Mei & Li, Danping, 2019. "Does the trans-regional transfer of resource-oriented enterprises generate a stress effect?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    9. Kesidou, Effie & Demirel, Pelin, 2012. "On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 862-870.
    10. Nhi Ba Nguyen & Bryan Boruff & Matthew Tonts, 2019. "The Regulatory Framework and Minerals Development in Vietnam: An Assessment of Challenges and Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ming Chen & Lina Song & Xiaobo Zhu & Yanshuo Zhu & Chuanhao Liu, 2023. "Does Green Finance Promote the Green Transformation of China’s Manufacturing Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krieger, Bastian & Zipperer, Vera, 2022. "Does green public procurement trigger environmental innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    2. Costantini, Valeria & Crespi, Francesco & Palma, Alessandro, 2017. "Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 799-819.
    3. Veronese da Silva, Aline & Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes-Ahn, Ana Lúcia, 2022. "Accounting multiple environmental variables in DEA energy transmission benchmarking modelling: The 2019 Brazilian case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Marzucchi, Alberto & Montresor, Sandro, 2017. "Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 208-221.
    5. Auci, Sabrina & Pronti, Andrea, 2023. "Irrigation technology adaptation for a sustainable agriculture: A panel endogenous switching analysis on the Italian farmland productivity," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Carlo Corradini, 2019. "Location determinants of green technological entry: evidence from European regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 845-858, April.
    7. Wang, Wei & Huang, Jun & Wang, Haibo & Alidaee, Bahram, 2022. "Internal and external analysis of community banks' performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Song, Malin & Peng, Licheng & Shang, Yuping & Zhao, Xin, 2022. "Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Sabrina Auci & Andrea Pronti, 2020. "Innovation in Irrigation Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture: An Endogenous Switching Analysis on Italian Farms’ Land Productivity," SEEDS Working Papers 1220, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Dec 2020.
    10. Giovanni Ferri & Marco Pini, 2019. "Environmental vs. Social Responsibility in the Firm. Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Riccardo Leoncini & Alberto Marzucchi & Sandro Montresor & Francesco Rentocchini & Ugo Rizzo, 2019. "‘Better late than never’: the interplay between green technology and age for firm growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 891-904, April.
    12. Wang, Wei & Wu, Fengping & Li, Cunfang, 2021. "Relationship between cross-regional transfer and the environment based on the coal enterprises in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Songping Zhu & Azhong Ye, 2018. "Does the Impact of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Reverse Green Technology Process Differ across Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Eva Coll-Martinez & Malia Kedjar & Patricia Renou-Maissant, 2020. "Location Determinants Of Ecoinnovative Firms In France," Working Papers 2020.02, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    15. Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Environmental management: Implications for business performance, innovation, and financing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Hepei Zhang & Zhangbao Zhong, 2022. "How Does Environmental Regulation Affect the Green Growth of China’s Citrus Industry? The Mediating Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Boris Mrkajic & Samuele Murtinu & Vittoria G. Scalera, 2019. "Is green the new gold? Venture capital and green entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 929-950, April.
    18. Eva Coll-Martínez & Malia Kedjar & Patricia Renou-Maissant, 2022. "(Green) Knowledge spillovers and regional environmental support: do they matter for the entry of new green tech-based firms?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(1), pages 119-161, August.
    19. Mohammad Nourani & Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh, 2019. "Capital Structure And Dynamic Performance: Evidence From Asean-5 Banks," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(03), pages 495-516, June.
    20. Averi Chakrabarti & Karen A Grépin & Stéphane Helleringer, 2019. "The impact of supplementary immunization activities on routine vaccination coverage: An instrumental variable analysis in five low-income countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13821-:d:951622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.