IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1016-d486056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does the Pandemic Facilitate Mobile Payment? An Investigation on Users’ Perspective under the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Yuyang Zhao

    (NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Campus de Campolide, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1070-312 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Fernando Bacao

    (NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Campus de Campolide, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1070-312 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Owing to the convenience, reliability and contact-free feature of Mobile payment (M-payment), it has been diffusely adopted in China during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce the direct and indirect contacts in transactions, allowing social distancing to be maintained and facilitating stabilization of the social economy. This paper aims to comprehensively investigate the technological and mental factors affecting users’ adoption intentions of M-payment under the COVID-19 pandemic, to expand the domain of technology adoption under the emergency situation. This study integrated Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) with perceived benefits from Mental Accounting Theory (MAT), and two additional variables (perceived security and trust) to investigate 739 smartphone users’ adoption intentions of M-payment during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. The empirical results showed that users’ technological and mental perceptions conjointly influence their adoption intentions of M-payment during the COVID-19 pandemic, wherein perceived benefits are significantly determined by social influence and trust, corresponding with the situation of pandemic. This study initially integrated UTAUT with MAT to develop the theoretical framework for investigating users’ adoption intentions. Meanwhile, this study originally investigated the antecedents of M-payment adoption under the pandemic situation and indicated that users’ perceptions will be positively influenced when technology’s specific characteristics can benefit a particular situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuyang Zhao & Fernando Bacao, 2021. "How Does the Pandemic Facilitate Mobile Payment? An Investigation on Users’ Perspective under the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1016-:d:486056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard H. Thaler, 2008. "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 15-25, 01-02.
    2. Drazen Prelec & George Loewenstein, 1998. "The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 4-28.
    3. Md. Shamim Hossain & Xiaoyan Zhou, 2018. "Impact of m-payments on purchase intention and customer satisfaction : perceived flow as mediator," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 2(3), pages 503-517.
    4. de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Demoulin, Nathalie T.M. & Zidda, Pietro, 2016. "Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 334-344.
    5. Gefen, David, 2000. "E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 725-737, December.
    6. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.
    7. Abdul Waheed Siyal & Ding Donghong & Waheed Ali Umrani & Saeed Siyal & Shaharbano Bhand, 2019. "Predicting Mobile Banking Acceptance and Loyalty in Chinese Bank Customers," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    8. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    9. Park, JungKun & Ahn, Jiseon & Thavisay, Toulany & Ren, Tianbao, 2019. "Examining the role of anxiety and social influence in multi-benefits of mobile payment service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-149.
    10. Gwarlann de Kerviler & Nathalie Demoulin & Pietro Zidda, 2016. "Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?," Post-Print hal-01526066, HAL.
    11. Pham, Thanh-Thao T. & Ho, Jonathan C., 2015. "The effects of product-related, personal-related factors and attractiveness of alternatives on consumer adoption of NFC-based mobile payments," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 159-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faruk Ahmeti & Burim Prenaj, 2022. "Determinants Affecting Consumer Acceptance and Adoption of Internet Banking in Developing Countries: The case study of Kosovo," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 60-79.
    2. Miloš Milosavljević & Milan Okanović & Slavica Cicvarić Kostić & Marija Jovanović & Milenko Radonić, 2023. "COVID-19 and Behavioral Factors of e-Payment Use: Evidence from Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Zhang, Qi & Ariffin, Shaizatulaqma Kamalul & Richardson, Christopher & Wang, Yuling, 2023. "Influencing factors of customer loyalty in mobile payment: A consumption value perspective and the role of alternative attractiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Mashaal A. M. Saif & Nazimah Hussin & Maizaitulaidawati Md Husin & Ayed Alwadain & Ayon Chakraborty, 2022. "Determinants of the Intention to Adopt Digital-Only Banks in Malaysia: The Extension of Environmental Concern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Niyati Jain & T. V. Raman, 2022. "A partial least squares approach to digital finance adoption," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 308-321, December.
    6. Weisong Qiu & Tieqi Wu & Peng Xue, 2022. "Can Mobile Payment Increase Household Income and Mitigate the Lower Income Condition Caused by Health Risks? Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Yujun Jiang & Ping Wang & Qiang Li & Yingji Li, 2022. "Students’ Intention toward Self-Regulated Learning under Blended Learning Setting: PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boden, Joe & Maier, Erik & Wilken, Robert, 2020. "The effect of credit card versus mobile payment on convenience and consumers’ willingness to pay," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Shaw, Norman & Eschenbrenner, Brenda & Brand, Benedikt M., 2022. "Towards a Mobile App Diffusion of Innovations model: A multinational study of mobile wallet adoption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Yuyang Zhao & Fernando Bacao, 2021. "How Does Gender Moderate Customer Intention of Shopping via Live-Streaming Apps during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown Period?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Kajol, K. & Singh, Ranjit & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Adoption of digital financial transactions: A review of literature and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Shankar, Amit & Rishi, Bikramjit, 2020. "Convenience matter in mobile banking adoption intention?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 273-285.
    6. Oussama Tounekti & Antonio Ruiz-Martínez & Antonio F. Skarmeta Gomez, 2022. "Research in Electronic and Mobile Payment Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Mashaal A. M. Saif & Nazimah Hussin & Maizaitulaidawati Md Husin & Ayed Alwadain & Ayon Chakraborty, 2022. "Determinants of the Intention to Adopt Digital-Only Banks in Malaysia: The Extension of Environmental Concern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Greenacre, Luke & Akbar, Skye, 2019. "The impact of payment method on shopping behaviour among low income consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 87-93.
    9. Amita Goyal Chin & Mark A. Harris & Robert Brookshire, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Intent to Adopt Mobile Payment Systems Using a Trust-based Extended Valence Framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 329-347, February.
    10. Liu, Yunxin & Dewitte, Siegfried, 2021. "A replication study of the credit card effect on spending behavior and an extension to mobile payments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Kalinic, Zoran & Marinkovic, Veljko & Molinillo, Sebastián & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco, 2019. "A multi-analytical approach to peer-to-peer mobile payment acceptance prediction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 143-153.
    12. Park, JungKun & Ahn, Jiseon & Thavisay, Toulany & Ren, Tianbao, 2019. "Examining the role of anxiety and social influence in multi-benefits of mobile payment service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-149.
    13. Isabelle Collin-Lachaud & Mbaye Fall Diallo, 2021. "Smartphone use during shopping and store loyalty: The role of social influence," Post-Print hal-03156195, HAL.
    14. Verkijika, Silas Formunyuy & Neneh, Brownhilder Ngek, 2021. "Standing up for or against: A text-mining study on the recommendation of mobile payment apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Dash, Ganesh & Sharma, Kiran & Yadav, Neha, 2023. "The diffusion of mobile payments: Profiling the adopters and non-adopters, Roger's way," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Kuo, Ren-Zong, 2020. "Why do people switch mobile payment service platforms? An empirical study in Taiwan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Komlan Gbongli & Yongan Xu & Komi Mawugbe Amedjonekou, 2019. "Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Predict Mobile-Based Money Acceptance and Sustainability: A Multi-Analytical Structural Equation Modeling and Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-33, July.
    18. Zhong, Junying & Chen, Tiao, 2023. "Antecedents of mobile payment loyalty: An extended perspective of perceived value and information system success model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Yizhao Jiang, 2022. "The Influence of Payment Method: Do Consumers Pay More with Mobile Payment?," Papers 2210.14631, arXiv.org.
    20. White, Tiffany Barnett & Novak, Thomas P. & Hoffman, Donna L., 2014. "No Strings Attached: When Giving It Away Versus Making Them Pay Reduces Consumer Information Disclosure," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 184-195.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1016-:d:486056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.