IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v26y2024i4d10.1007_s10796-023-10421-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers’ Willingness to Use Mobile Payments in Micro Business Transactions: Differences in Demographic Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Claudel Mombeuil

    (Rezo Inovasyon Edikatif Ayisyen (RINOVEDA)
    Université Notre Dame d’Haïti (MBA))

Abstract

This study investigates the factors affecting consumers' willingness to use mobile payment systems for micro-business transactions, in a context where mobile payments are predominantly used for peer-to-peer (P2P) remittance transfers. The study considers five variables: Perceived Risks, Perceived Costs, Lifestyle Compatibility, Comparative Advantage, and trust in the mobile payment ecosystem. The study also explores whether there are differences in willingness to use mobile payments based on gender, age, and frequency of using mobile payments for P2P remittance transfers. The study uses a sample of 476 respondents and employs a structural equation model. The results indicate that only lifestyle compatibility and trust in the mobile payment ecosystem have a significant influence on consumers' willingness to use mobile payments for micro-business transactions. Additionally, the study finds no significant differences in willingness to use mobile payments across gender, age, or frequency of mobile payment usage, except for the effect of perceived risks on occasional users, where the effect is negative and significant. Overall, the findings suggest that micro-businesses interested in adopting mobile payments should focus on creating a lifestyle-compatible and trustworthy ecosystem for their customers. The study's results also imply that occasional users of mobile payments may require additional reassurance to overcome perceived risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudel Mombeuil, 2024. "Consumers’ Willingness to Use Mobile Payments in Micro Business Transactions: Differences in Demographic Factors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1495-1508, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-023-10421-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-023-10421-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-023-10421-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-023-10421-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    2. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Bodhi, Rahul & Singh, Tripti & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "Why do people use and recommend m-wallets?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Viviana Alfonso C & Alexandre Tombini & Fabrizio Zampolli, 2020. "Retail payments in Latin America and the Caribbean: present and future," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December.
    4. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    5. Amita Goyal Chin & Mark A. Harris & Robert Brookshire, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Intent to Adopt Mobile Payment Systems Using a Trust-based Extended Valence Framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 329-347, February.
    6. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2004. "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 37-59, March.
    7. Peter, J Paul & Tarpey, Lawrence X, Sr, 1975. "A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(1), pages 29-37, June.
    8. Terri Bradford & Fumiko Hayashi, 2014. "Mobile payments : merchants’ perspectives," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue Q II, pages 33-58.
    9. de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Demoulin, Nathalie T.M. & Zidda, Pietro, 2016. "Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 334-344.
    10. Rishi Manrai & Kriti Priya Gupta, 2022. "A study on factors influencing mobile payment adoption using theory of diffusion of innovation," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 39(2), pages 219-240.
    11. Peter J Jordan & Ashlea C Troth, 2020. "Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 3-14, February.
    12. Gupta, Anil & Arora, Neelika, 2017. "Understanding determinants and barriers of mobile shopping adoption using behavioral reasoning theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-7.
    13. Henry Kaiser, 1974. "An index of factorial simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 31-36, March.
    14. Marett, Kent & Pearson, Allison W. & Pearson, Rodney A. & Bergiel, Erich, 2015. "Using mobile devices in a high risk context: The role of risk and trust in an exploratory study in Afghanistan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 54-64.
    15. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    16. Gwarlann de Kerviler & Nathalie Demoulin & Pietro Zidda, 2016. "Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?," Post-Print hal-01526066, HAL.
    17. Laukkanen, Tommi, 2016. "Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2432-2439.
    18. Pham, Thanh-Thao T. & Ho, Jonathan C., 2015. "The effects of product-related, personal-related factors and attractiveness of alternatives on consumer adoption of NFC-based mobile payments," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 159-172.
    19. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Singh, Naveen & Sahu, Ganesh & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "An innovation resistance theory perspective on mobile payment solutions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaw, Norman & Eschenbrenner, Brenda & Brand, Benedikt M., 2022. "Towards a Mobile App Diffusion of Innovations model: A multinational study of mobile wallet adoption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Verkijika, Silas Formunyuy & Neneh, Brownhilder Ngek, 2021. "Standing up for or against: A text-mining study on the recommendation of mobile payment apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    4. Dan J. Kim & Donald L. Ferrin & H. Raghav Rao, 2009. "Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 237-257, June.
    5. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Avornyo, Philip & Fang, Jiaming & Antwi, Collins Opoku & Aboagye, Michael Osei & Boadi, Evans Asante, 2019. "Are customers still with us? The influence of optimum stimulation level and IT-specific traits on mobile banking discontinuous usage intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 348-360.
    7. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. Amita Goyal Chin & Mark A. Harris & Robert Brookshire, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Intent to Adopt Mobile Payment Systems Using a Trust-based Extended Valence Framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 329-347, February.
    9. Wasapon Thanabodypath & Achara Chandrachai & Sudkate Chaiyo & Orawon Chailapakul, 2021. "Industrial Buyer Innovation Adoption Model: A Focus on a Smartphone-Based Electrochemical Analytical Device for Toxic Heavy Metal Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. George Konteos & Vaggelis Saprikis & Giorgos Avlogiaris & Aristides Papathomas, 2023. "An Extended UTAUT Model to Explore the Influential Factors towards M-Banking Apps’ Use," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(7), pages 1-29, February.
    12. Dash, Ganesh & Sharma, Kiran & Yadav, Neha, 2023. "The diffusion of mobile payments: Profiling the adopters and non-adopters, Roger's way," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele, 2020. "Privacy threats with retail technologies: A consumer perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Impact of online convenience on mobile banking adoption intention: A moderated mediation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    15. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    16. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Shankar, Amit & Rishi, Bikramjit, 2020. "Convenience matter in mobile banking adoption intention?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 273-285.
    18. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.
    19. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    20. Liu, Yu-li & Yan, Wenjia & Hu, Bo, 2021. "Resistance to facial recognition payment in China: The influence of privacy-related factors," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-023-10421-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.