IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p5086-d384533.html

Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Model-Based Evaluation of Community Care Facilities’ Spatial Accessibility in Xi’an, China

Author

Listed:
  • Sunwei Liu

    (School of Human Settlement and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Yupeng Wang

    (School of Human Settlement and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Dian Zhou

    (School of Human Settlement and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Yitong Kang

    (School of Human Settlement and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

Due to the rapid increase in the number of elderly people in Chinese cities, the development and planning of aged care facilities, and particularly community care facilities, which will gradually become the mainstream choice for the elderly in China, is becoming an important topic for urban sustainability. Previous studies have shown that the number and scale of aged care facilities in many cities are far from meeting the needs of the elderly and the overall occupation rate is low. Some of these cities are still expanding and some are undergoing urban renovation. In this process, the scientific planning of community care facilities to promote efficient use of facility resources has become an urgent problem that needs to be solved. In this study, the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method and a potential model based on the Geographic Information System (GIS) were used to carry out a scientific evaluation of the spatial accessibility of community care facilities in the Beilin district of Xi’an. The aims were to explore the best quantitative research methods for assessing the distribution of Xi’an community care facilities’ spatial accessibility, provide ideas for similar studies in the future, and further the understanding of spatial allocation of urban community care facilities resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunwei Liu & Yupeng Wang & Dian Zhou & Yitong Kang, 2020. "Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Model-Based Evaluation of Community Care Facilities’ Spatial Accessibility in Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5086-:d:384533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chesnais, Jean-Claude, 1992. "The Demographic Transition: Stages, Patterns, and Economic Implications," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198286592.
    2. Plaisier, Inger & Verbeek-Oudijk, Debbie & de Klerk, Mirjam, 2017. "Developments in home-care use. Policy and changing community-based care use by independent community-dwelling adults in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 82-89.
    3. Weibull, Jorgen W., 1976. "An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 357-379, December.
    4. Bertin, Giovanni & Pantalone, Marta, 2019. "Professional identity in community care: The case of specialist physicians in outpatient services in Italy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 21-28.
    5. Elena Matei & Despina Saghin & Liliana Dumitrache & Mariana Nae, 2018. "Multidimensional Approach on Sustainability of Ageing in Romanian Residential Care Centres for Elders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Tatsuya Nishino, 2017. "Quantitative Properties of the Macro Supply and Demand Structure for Care Facilities for Elderly in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Kanuganti, Shalini & Sarkar, Ashoke Kumar & Singh, Ajit Pratap, 2016. "Evaluation of access to health care in rural areas using enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 45-52.
    8. Ipingbemi, Olusiyi, 2010. "Travel characteristics and mobility constraints of the elderly in Ibadan, Nigeria," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 285-291.
    9. Sandra Rosenbloom, 2001. "Sustainability and automobility among the elderly: An international assessment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 375-408, November.
    10. Hyunjoong Kim & Fahui Wang, 2019. "Disparity in Spatial Access to Public Daycare and Kindergarten across GIS-Constructed Regions in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Yang, Shuo & Cao, Zhan & De Vos, Jonas & Witlox, Frank, 2019. "Active travel for active ageing in China: The role of built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 142-152.
    12. Peckham, Allie & Morton-Chang, Frances & Williams, A. Paul & Miller, Fiona A., 2018. "Rebalancing health systems toward community-based care: The role of subsectoral politics," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(11), pages 1260-1265.
    13. Sato, Koryu & Ikeda, Takaaki & Watanabe, Ryota & Kondo, Naoki & Kawachi, Ichiro & Kondo, Katsunori, 2020. "Intensity of community-based programs by long-term care insurers and the likelihood of frailty: Multilevel analysis of older Japanese adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    14. Yupeng Wang & Hiroatsu Fukuda, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Shrinking Cities: A Case from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linggui Liu & Han Lyu & Yi Zhao & Dian Zhou, 2022. "An Improved Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) Method for Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Elderly Care Facilities in Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Jiayi Zhang & Yingzi Chen & Yaqi Hu & Lina Lai, 2023. "Spatial Equality of Urban Care Facilities from the Perspective of Refinement: An Example from Changchun, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Kan Wang & Jianjun Bai & Xing Dang, 2020. "Spatial Difference and Equity Analysis for Accessibility to Three-Level Medical Services Based on Actual Medical Behavior in Shaanxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Zhenwei Wang & Xiaochun Wang & Zijin Dong & Lisan Li & Wangjun Li & Shicheng Li, 2023. "More Urban Elderly Care Facilities Should Be Placed in Densely Populated Areas for an Aging Wuhan of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwang-Sub Lee & Jin Ki Eom & Jun Lee & Sangpil Ko, 2021. "Analysis of the Activity and Travel Patterns of the Elderly Using Mobile Phone-Based Hourly Locational Trajectory Data: Case Study of Gangnam, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Linggui Liu & Han Lyu & Yi Zhao & Dian Zhou, 2022. "An Improved Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) Method for Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Elderly Care Facilities in Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Su, Rongxiang & Xiao, Jingyi & McBride, Elizabeth C. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2021. "Understanding senior's daily mobility patterns in California using human mobility motifs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Yang, Yongjiang & Sasaki, Kuniaki & Cheng, Long & Tao, Sui, 2022. "Does the built environment matter for active travel among older adults: Insights from Chiba City, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Yang, Dujuan & Timmermans, Harry & Grigolon, Anna, 2013. "Exploring heterogeneity in travel time expenditure of aging populations in the Netherlands: results of a CHAID analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 170-179.
    6. Carlo Luiu & Miles Tight & Michael Burrow, 2018. "Factors Preventing the Use of Alternative Transport Modes to the Car in Later Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Liu, Shasha & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Yao, Enjian & Nakamura, Toshiyuki, 2021. "Examining public transport usage by older adults with smart card data: A longitudinal study in Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Wei Hu & Lin Li & Mo Su, 2019. "Spatial Inequity of Multi-Level Healthcare Services in a Rapid Expanding Immigrant City of China: A Case Study of Shenzhen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Saidatulakmal Mohd & Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff & Abdelhak Senadjki, 2019. "Travel Behavior of Elderly in George Town and Malacca, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Wu, Na & Tian, Qingsong & Cui, Mengying & He, Mingwei, 2023. "A delicacy evaluation method for park walkability considering multidimensional quality heterogeneity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Zhang Sen & Zhang Ke & Liu Xiaoyang & Zeng Jian & Liu Yan & Zhao Lian, 2022. "Characterisation of elderly daily travel behaviour in Tianjin using a space–time cube," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 603-618, February.
    12. Soltani, Ali & Pojani, Dorina & Askari, Sajad & Masoumi, Houshmand E., 2018. "Socio-demographic and built environment determinants of car use among older adults in Iran," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 109-117.
    13. Qiu, Jiuyun & Cheng, Lei & Hu, Qiwen & Wang, Peigang, 2025. "How digital and social isolation drive frailty transitions in middle-aged and elderly adults populations: a seven-year multicohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    14. Lovejoy, Kristin, 2012. "Mobility Fulfillment Among Low-car Households: Implications for Reducing Auto Dependence in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4v44b5qn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    15. Jieya Yang & Ayberk Kocatepe & Onur Alisan & Eren Erman Ozguven, 2024. "Geographical Information Systems-Based Assessment of Evacuation Accessibility to Special Needs Shelters Comparing Storm Surge Impacts of Hurricane Irma (2017) and Ian (2022)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Fredriksson, Anders & Macchione Saes, Maria Sylvia, 2025. "Quantifying political effects in the spatial allocation of public services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Ariyanti, Octaviani & Sampaio, Dora & Bailey, Ajay, 2025. "Barriers and facilitators to urban mobility for older adults in LMICs: A scoping review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Naqavi, Fatemeh & Sundberg, Marcus & Västberg, Oskar Blom & Karlström, Anders & Hugosson, Muriel Beser, 2023. "Mobility constraints and accessibility to work: Application to Stockholm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Luiu, Carlo & Wandera, Amos & Bukachi, Vera & Day, Rosie, 2026. "Exploring the mobilities of Kenyan older people living in informal settlements using a capability approach," SocArXiv fkh7z_v1, Center for Open Science.
    20. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5086-:d:384533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.