IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i5p846-d212150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Ticket-Checking Failure on Dynamics of Pedestrians at Multi-Exit Inspection Points with Various Layouts

Author

Listed:
  • Meiying Jiang

    (School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
    School of Humanities and Law, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Qibing Jin

    (School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Lisheng Cheng

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

It is of great significance to understand the dynamics and risk level of pedestrians at the multi-exit inspection points, since they are the bottlenecks of pedestrian flow leaving public places, such as subway and railway stations. Microscopic simulations were carried out with a cellular automata model to investigate the effects of ticket-checking failure on pedestrian dynamics when passing through the multi-exit inspection points with parallel, convex and concave layouts. It was found that although ticket-checking failure could reduce the passing efficiency, it also lowers the competitive level between pedestrians and enhances passing safety in the range of medium and high pedestrian density. The competitive level decreases when increasing the probability of ticket-checking failure and the corresponding delay. The probability of ticket-checking failure and the corresponding delay have equivalent effects on passing efficiency and safety, and can be integrated as average delay. A fitted equation was proposed for the dependence of passing efficiency and safety on average delay. With the existence of ticket-checking failure in reality, the concave layout of the multi-exit inspection points gives rise to a much lower competitive level compared with the parallel and convex ones, which would enhance the safety of pedestrians at the exits.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiying Jiang & Qibing Jin & Lisheng Cheng, 2019. "Effects of Ticket-Checking Failure on Dynamics of Pedestrians at Multi-Exit Inspection Points with Various Layouts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:5:p:846-:d:212150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/5/846/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/5/846/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin-Yi Song & Qing-Chang Lu & Zhong-Ren Peng, 2018. "Spatial Distribution of Fine Particulate Matter in Underground Passageways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Liao, Weichen & Tordeux, Antoine & Seyfried, Armin & Chraibi, Mohcine & Drzycimski, Kevin & Zheng, Xiaoping & Zhao, Ying, 2016. "Measuring the steady state of pedestrian flow in bottleneck experiments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 248-261.
    3. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    4. Armin Seyfried & Oliver Passon & Bernhard Steffen & Maik Boltes & Tobias Rupprecht & Wolfram Klingsch, 2009. "New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 395-406, August.
    5. Fang, Zhiming & Song, Weiguo & Zhang, Jun & Wu, Hao, 2010. "Experiment and modeling of exit-selecting behaviors during a building evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(4), pages 815-824.
    6. Sun, Lishan & Luo, Wei & Yao, Liya & Qiu, Shi & Rong, Jian, 2017. "A comparative study of funnel shape bottlenecks in subway stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 14-27.
    7. Zheng, Xiaoping & Li, Wei & Guan, Chao, 2010. "Simulation of evacuation processes in a square with a partition wall using a cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(11), pages 2177-2188.
    8. Ying-Yi Chen & Fung-Chang Sung & Mei-Lien Chen & I-Fang Mao & Chung-Yen Lu, 2016. "Indoor Air Quality in the Metro System in North Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Yuan, Weifeng & Tan, Kang Hai, 2007. "An evacuation model using cellular automata," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 384(2), pages 549-566.
    10. Yue, Hao & Guan, Hongzhi & Shao, Chunfu & Zhang, Xu, 2011. "Simulation of pedestrian evacuation with asymmetrical exits layout," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(2), pages 198-207.
    11. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid, 2017. "Stated and revealed exit choices of pedestrian crowd evacuees," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 238-259.
    12. Wang, Lei & Zhang, Qian & Cai, Yun & Zhang, Jianlin & Ma, Qingguo, 2013. "Simulation study of pedestrian flow in a station hall during the Spring Festival travel rush," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(10), pages 2470-2478.
    13. Zhichao Cao & Zhenzhou Yuan & Silin Zhang, 2016. "Performance Analysis of Stop-Skipping Scheduling Plans in Rail Transit under Time-Dependent Demand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Tang, Tie-Qiao & Shao, Yi-Xiao & Chen, Liang, 2017. "Modeling pedestrian movement at the hall of high-speed railway station during the check-in process," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 157-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Ying & Jia, Bin & Li, Xin-Gang & Zhu, Nuo, 2011. "Evacuation dynamics with fire spreading based on cellular automaton," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(18), pages 3147-3156.
    2. Li, Na & Guo, Ren-Yong, 2020. "Simulation of bi-directional pedestrian flow through a bottleneck: Cell transmission model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 555(C).
    3. Krbálek, Milan & Hrabák, Pavel & Bukáček, Marek, 2018. "Pedestrian headways — Reflection of territorial social forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 38-49.
    4. Milad Haghani & Majid Sarvi & Zahra Shahhoseini & Maik Boltes, 2016. "How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans’ Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Li, Jun & Fu, Siyao & He, Haibo & Jia, Hongfei & Li, Yanzhong & Guo, Yi, 2015. "Simulating large-scale pedestrian movement using CA and event driven model: Methodology and case study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 304-321.
    6. Liu, Qian, 2018. "The effect of dedicated exit on the evacuation of heterogeneous pedestrians," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 305-323.
    7. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid, 2018. "Crowd behaviour and motion: Empirical methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 253-294.
    8. Fu, Zhijian & Zhou, Xiaodong & Zhu, Kongjin & Chen, Yanqiu & Zhuang, Yifan & Hu, Yuqi & Yang, Lizhong & Chen, Changkun & Li, Jian, 2015. "A floor field cellular automaton for crowd evacuation considering different walking abilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 294-303.
    9. Zhang, Hui & Xu, Jie & Jia, Limin & Shi, Yihan, 2021. "Research on walking efficiency of passengers around corner of subway station," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    10. Tian, Huan-huan & Wei, Yan-fang & Dong, Li-yun & Xue, Yu & Zheng, Rong-sen, 2018. "Resolution of conflicts in cellular automaton evacuation model with the game-theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 991-1006.
    11. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    12. Kefan Xie & Benbu Liang & Yu Song & Xueqin Dong, 2019. "Analysis of Walking-Edge Effect in Train Station Evacuation Scenarios: A Sustainable Transportation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Miyagawa, Daiki & Ichinose, Genki, 2020. "Cellular automaton model with turning behavior in crowd evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    14. Liang, Mengdi & Xu, Jie & Jia, Limin & Qin, Yong, 2020. "An improved model of passenger merging in a Y-shaped passage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    15. Chen, Changkun & Sun, Huakai & Lei, Peng & Zhao, Dongyue & Shi, Congling, 2021. "An extended model for crowd evacuation considering pedestrian panic in artificial attack," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    16. Zheng, Yaochen & Chen, Jianqiao & Wei, Junhong & Guo, Xiwei, 2012. "Modeling of pedestrian evacuation based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(17), pages 4225-4233.
    17. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    18. Cao, Shuchao & Lian, Liping & Chen, Mingyi & Yao, Ming & Song, Weiguo & Fang, Zhiming, 2018. "Investigation of difference of fundamental diagrams in pedestrian flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 661-670.
    19. Dirk Helbing & Pratik Mukerji, "undated". "Crowd Disasters as Systemic Failures: Analysis of the Love Parade Disaster," Working Papers ETH-RC-12-010, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    20. Kurdi, Heba & Almulifi, Asma & Al-Megren, Shiroq & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2021. "A balanced evacuation algorithm for facilities with multiple exits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 285-296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:5:p:846-:d:212150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.