IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i4p353-d94271.html

Conceptions of Contraceptive Use in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Lessons for Programming

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Ndinda

    (Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria 0083, South Africa
    School of Social Sciences (Sociology), University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal Dalbridge 4041, South Africa)

  • Tidings Ndhlovu

    (Department of Economics and International Business, Faculty of Business and Law, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK
    Graduate School of Business Leadership, University of South Africa, Midrand Johannesburg 1685, South Africa)

  • Nene Ernest Khalema

    (School of Built Environment and Development Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal Dalbridge 4041, South Africa)

Abstract

Community family planning programmes in South Africa arose from the controversial apartheid history of controlling the African population while encouraging the growth of European migrant population. Post-apartheid population policies shifted away from population control to aligning policies to the global agenda that placed emphasis on the link between population and development. The focus on population and development polices in post-apartheid South Africa is on social equality, justice and peace rather than controlling sections of the population. Given the shift, this paper interrogates the conceptions of contraceptive use among rural communities in KwaZulu-Natal. Our primary objective is to understand the dynamics surrounding access to and use of family planning services in peri-urban and rural areas of KwaZulu-Natal. Using focus group data, the findings of the study suggest that different social categories interact with the family planning programmes differently. How teenagers and married women perceive the value of family planning differs. Gender differences regarding the use of condoms are also evident. The paper attempts to grapple with the non-use of condoms despite the knowledge that these prevent pregnancy and provide protection from sexually-transmitted diseases. The contribution of this paper lies in its identification of socio-cultural factors and the political economy underlying the different attitudes towards contraceptive use in rural KwaZulu-Natal.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Ndinda & Tidings Ndhlovu & Nene Ernest Khalema, 2017. "Conceptions of Contraceptive Use in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Lessons for Programming," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:353-:d:94271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/353/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/353/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smylie, Janet & Kirst, Maritt & McShane, Kelly & Firestone, Michelle & Wolfe, Sara & O'Campo, Patricia, 2016. "Understanding the role of Indigenous community participation in Indigenous prenatal and infant-toddler health promotion programs in Canada: A realist review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 128-143.
    2. Ronald D. Lee & David S. Reher, 2011. "Introduction: The Landscape of Demographic Transition and Its Aftermath," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 37(Supplemen), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Lant Pritchett & Martina Viarengo, 2013. "Why Demographic Suicide? The Puzzles of European Fertility," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 38, pages 55-71, February.
    4. Geoffrey McNicoll, 2013. "Reflections on Post-Transition Demography," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 38, pages 3-19, February.
    5. John Bongaarts & John Casterline, 2013. "Fertility Transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa Different?," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 38, pages 153-168, February.
    6. Thomas Anderson & Hans-Peter Kohler, 2015. "Low Fertility, Socioeconomic Development, and Gender Equity," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 381-407, September.
    7. Shelly Lundberg & Robert A. Pollak, 2007. "The American Family and Family Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 3-26, Spring.
    8. Shelley Clark, 2000. "Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from india," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(1), pages 95-108, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:rbs:ijbess:v:7:y:2026:i:6:p:516-523 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ophilile Mdhluli & Valery. B Ferim Valery B Ferim, 2025. "Traditional medicine in reproductive health: A social justice analysis in Allandale village, Mpumalanga province, South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 14(8), pages 288-299, December.
    3. Kgashane Johannes Malesa & Goitsione Emelda Leburu, 2025. "Gendered power and reproductive justice: a study of structural and cultural barriers to sexual and reproductive health rights among rural married women in South Africa," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(6), pages 516-523, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ankita Mishra & Jaai Parasnis, 2021. "Husband, sons and the fertility gap: evidence from India," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 71-102, March.
    2. da Silva Francisco, António A., 2017. "‘Gerontogrowth’ and population ageing in Africa and the Global AgeWatch Index," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 78-89.
    3. Keera Allendorf, 2020. "Another Gendered Demographic Dividend: Adjusting to a Future without Sons," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 46(3), pages 471-499, September.
    4. Anna Adamecz & Anna Lovász & Sunčica Vujić, 2025. "Beyond the Degree: Fertility Outcomes of ‘First in Family’ Graduates," KRTK-KTI WORKING PAPERS 2506, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    5. Lídia Farré, 2013. "The Role of Men in the Economic and Social Development of Women: Implications for Gender Equality," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 22-51, February.
    6. Tia Palermo & Sudhanshu Handa & Amber Peterman & Leah Prencipe & David Seidenfeld, 2016. "Unconditional government social cash transfer in Africa does not increase fertility," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 29(4), pages 1083-1111, October.
    7. Sun, Ang & Zhao, Yaohui, 2016. "Divorce, abortion, and the child sex ratio: The impact of divorce reform in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 53-69.
    8. Daniela Smiraglia & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Antonio Giménez-Morera & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, 2021. "Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    9. repec:ash:wpaper:37 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Olivia Bertelli, 2015. "The more the merrier? Adjusting fertility to weather shocks," PSE Working Papers halshs-01226421, HAL.
    11. Vaidehi Tandel & Arnab Dutta & Sahil Gandhi & Ashwini Narayanan, 2023. "Women’s right to property and the child quantity-quality trade-off: evidence from India," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 2967-3003, October.
    12. Chris Wilson, 2013. "Thinking about post-transitional demographic regimes," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(46), pages 1373-1388.
    13. Ella Sargsyan, 2022. "Violent Conflicts and Child Gender Preferences of Parents: Evidence from Nigeria," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp723, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    14. Joe Varghese & Vijay Aruldas & Panniyammakal Jeemon, 2008. "Beyond the Numbers," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 115-125, January.
    15. Kumo, Kazuhiro & Perugini, Cristiano, 2023. "Religion, Ideology and Fertility," IZA Discussion Papers 16159, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Ueyama, Mika, 2007. "Income growth and gender bias in childhood mortality in developing countries," IFPRI discussion papers 739, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Ann-Zofie Duvander & Trude Lappegård & Synøve N. Andersen & Ólöf Garðarsdóttir & Gerda Neyer & Ida Viklund, 2019. "Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(51), pages 1501-1528.
    18. Cigno, A., 2016. "Conflict and Cooperation Within the Family, and Between the State and the Family, in the Provision of Old-Age Security," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 609-660, Elsevier.
    19. Ho‐Po Crystal Wong & Cynthia Bansak, 2025. "Child custody laws and partners' cooperation: An analysis of married and unmarried mothers during the time of COVID‐19," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 63(3), pages 759-784, July.
    20. Lnu,Anukriti & Herrera-Almanza,Catalina & Karra,Mahesh Venkat, 2022. "Bring a Friend : Strengthening Women’s Social Networks and Reproductive Autonomy in India," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10107, The World Bank.
    21. Cygan-Rehm, Kamila & Kuehnle, Daniel & Riphahn, Regina T., 2018. "Paid parental leave and families’ living arrangements," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 182-197.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:353-:d:94271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.