IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i8p2081-d1637038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agriculture’s Potential Regional Economic Contributions to the United States Economy When Supplying Feedstock to the Bio-Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Burton C. English

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901, USA)

  • Robert Jamey Menard

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901, USA)

  • Daniel G. de la Torre Ugarte

    (Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

  • Lixia H. Lambert

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Chad M. Hellwinckel

    (Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

  • Matthew H. Langholtz

    (Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

Abstract

The economic impact of obtaining biomass could become significant to U.S. rural economies via the establishment of a bioeconomy. In 2023, the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory provided a road map to obtain over a billion tons of biomass for conversion to bioenergy and other products. Using information from this roadmap, this study estimates the potential positive and negative economic impacts that occur because of land use change, along with increased technological advances. This is achieved by using the input–output model, IMPLAN, and impacting 179 Bureau of Economic Analysis regions in the conterminous United States. Biomass included in the analysis comprises dedicated energy crops, crop residues, and forest residues. The analysis found that managing pastures more intensively could result in releasing land to produce dedicated energy crops on 30.8 million hectares, resulting in the production of 361 million metric tons of biomass. This, coupled with crop residues from barley, corn, oats, sorghum, and wheat (162 million metric tons), plus forest residues (41 million metric tons), provide 564 million dry metric tons of biomass. Assuming the price for biomass in 2023 dollars was USD 77 per dry metric-ton, this additional production results in an economic benefit for the nation of USD 619 billion, an increase from the Business As Is scenario (Baseline) of almost USD 100 billion per year, assuming a mature biomass industry. An additional 700,000 jobs are required to grow, harvest/collect, and transport the biomass material from the land.

Suggested Citation

  • Burton C. English & Robert Jamey Menard & Daniel G. de la Torre Ugarte & Lixia H. Lambert & Chad M. Hellwinckel & Matthew H. Langholtz, 2025. "Agriculture’s Potential Regional Economic Contributions to the United States Economy When Supplying Feedstock to the Bio-Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-31, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:2081-:d:1637038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/2081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/2081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahal, Ram P. & Aguilar, Francisco X. & McGarvey, Ronald G. & Becker, Dennis & Abt, Karen L., 2020. "Localized economic contributions of renewable wood-based biopower generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Burton C. English & Cameron Short & Earl O. Heady, 1981. "The Economic Feasibility of Crop Residues as Auxiliary Fuel in Coal-Fired Power Plants," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 636-644.
    3. Maryam Nematian & John N. Ng’ombe & Catherine Keske, 2024. "Sustaining agricultural economies: regional economic impacts of biochar production from waste orchard biomass in California's Central Valley," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30701-30721, December.
    4. He, Lixia & English, Burton C. & Menard, Robert J. & Lambert, Dayton M., 2016. "Regional woody biomass supply and economic impacts from harvesting in the southern U.S," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 151-161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashkan Mirzaee & Ronald Mcgarvey & Francisco Aguilar, 2024. "Feasibility of satisfying projected biopower demands in support of decarbonization interventions: A spatially-explicit cost optimization model applied to woody biomass in the eastern US," Post-Print hal-04834084, HAL.
    2. Mirzaee, Ashkan & McGarvey, Ronald G. & Aguilar, Francisco X., 2024. "Feasibility of satisfying projected biopower demands in support of decarbonization interventions: A spatially-explicit cost optimization model applied to woody biomass in the eastern US," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Silverman, Rochelle E. & Flores, Robert J. & Brouwer, Jack, 2020. "Energy and economic assessment of distributed renewable gas and electricity generation in a small disadvantaged urban community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Thorsell, Sara & Epplin, Francis M. & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2003. "Economies Of Size Of A Coordinated Biorefinery Feedstock Harvest System," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35059, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Ashkan Mirzaee & Ronald G. McGarvey & Francisco X. Aguilar & Erin M. Schliep, 2023. "Impact of biopower generation on eastern US forests," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4087-4105, May.
    6. Griffith, Andrew P. & Haque, Mohua & Epplin, Francis M., 2014. "Cost to produce and deliver cellulosic feedstock to a biorefinery: Switchgrass and forage sorghum," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 44-54.
    7. Keith L. Kline & Virginia H. Dale & Erin Rose & Bruce Tonn, 2021. "Effects of Production of Woody Pellets in the Southeastern United States on the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Dumortier, Jerome, 2013. "Co-firing in coal power plants and its impact on biomass feedstock availability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 396-405.
    9. McKenzie Thomas & Kimberly L. Jensen & Dayton M. Lambert & Burton C. English & Christopher D. Clark & Forbes R. Walker, 2021. "Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Potting Mix with Biochar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Picciano, Paul & Aguilar, Francisco X. & Burtraw, Dallas & Mirzaee, Ashkan, 2022. "Environmental and socio-economic implications of woody biomass co-firing at coal-fired power plants," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Carruthers, S.P. & Jones, M.R., 1983. "Biofuel production strategies for UK agriculture," Centre for Agricultural Strategy - Papers and Reports 337527, University of Reading.
    12. Shu, Kesheng & Schneider, Uwe A. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2017. "Optimizing the bioenergy industry infrastructure: Transportation networks and bioenergy plant locations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 247-261.
    13. Maung, Thein A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2008. "Economics of Biomass Fuels for Electricity Production: A Case Study with Crop Residues," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6417, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Lehtonen, Olli & Okkonen, Lasse, 2019. "Energy cost reduction creates additional socioeconomic benefits– The case of Eno Energy Cooperative, Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 352-359.
    15. Mardones, Cristian, 2023. "Economic and environmental effects of financing subsidies for non-conventional renewable energies with a carbon tax – A comparison of intersectoral models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Poudel, Jagdish & Dahal, Ram, 2025. "A comprehensive look at the forest products industry’s economic contribution to the United States: Pre- and post-COVID analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Zhou, J. & Tabata, T., 2022. "Economic, societal, and environmental evaluation of woody biomass heat utilization: A case study in Kobe, Japan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 256-268.
    18. Maryam Nematian & John N. Ng’ombe & Catherine Keske, 2024. "Sustaining agricultural economies: regional economic impacts of biochar production from waste orchard biomass in California's Central Valley," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30701-30721, December.
    19. Kuznetsov, G.V. & Malyshev, D. Yu & Syrodoy, S.V. & Gutareva, N. Yu & Purin, M.V. & Kostoreva, Zh. A., 2022. "Justification of the use of forest waste in the power industry as one of the components OF BIO-coal-water suspension fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    20. Maung, Thein A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2013. "Economic factors influencing potential use of cellulosic crop residues for electricity generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 81-91.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:2081-:d:1637038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.