IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i8p1892-d1630510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Potential of Plant Biomass in Poland Compared to Other Renewable Energy Sources for Heat and Electricity Production

Author

Listed:
  • Rafał Wyszomierski

    (International Academy of Applied Sciences in Łomża, Studencka 19, 18-402 Łomża, Poland)

  • Piotr Bórawski

    (Department of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska

    (Department of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

Plant biomass is playing a key role in the development of renewable energy sources. The share of biomass in renewable energy sources is about 70% in Poland and more than 40% in the European Union (EU). To assess the competitive position of farms selling plant biomass including straw and wood, including both future opportunities and threats, we conducted research on 185 farms in 2022. The aim of the research was to assess the usage of plant biomass, with the aim of increasing its position compared to other renewable energy sources. We used tabular, graph and descriptive methods to present the research results. Moreover, the Dornik–Hansen test ( p = 0.003), Shapiro–Wilk test ( p = 0.0017), Lilliefors test ( p = 0.000) and Jargue–Berra test ( p = 0.008) results show the significance of the research. The most important factors shaping the increased prices of biomass were the availability of raw materials on the market, totaling 41.1%, and calorific value, totaling 17.6%. Looking at the data, it can be seen that the most popular renewable energy technologies in which respondents plan to invest is photovoltaics (57.8%) and biomass (17.6%). According to the respondents, the most profitable renewable energy sources are photovoltaics (38.4%), wind energy (23%) and biogas (16.2%). Farmers also pointed out the most ecologically friendly, renewable energy sources. According to the respondents, the most ecologically friendly, renewable energy sources were wind energy (32.2%), photovoltaics (25.3%) and water energy plants (20.7%). The most frequently indicated limitations of biomass production were the long payback period (19.2%) and high investment costs (18.9%). The most important threat to biomass production was the shortage of arable land (32.5%) and poor farmland (23.5%). These results show that policymakers should adjust laws to encourage farmers to invest in biomass as a renewable energy source. Photovoltaics, which is considered a very clean renewable energy source, faces a big task in cleaning rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafał Wyszomierski & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska, 2025. "Competitive Potential of Plant Biomass in Poland Compared to Other Renewable Energy Sources for Heat and Electricity Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:1892-:d:1630510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/1892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/8/1892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Niezgoda & Klaudyna Kowalska, 2020. "Sharing Economy and Lifestyle Changes, as Exemplified by the Tourism Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Kuik, Onno & Branger, Frédéric & Quirion, Philippe, 2019. "Competitive advantage in the renewable energy industry: Evidence from a gravity model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 472-481.
    3. Dorota Janiszewska & Luiza Ossowska, 2023. "Spatial Differentiation of Agricultural Biomass Potential in Polish Voivodeships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Jan Fagerberg & Mark Knell & Martin Srholec, 2004. "The Competitiveness of Nations: Economic Growth in the ECE Region," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20040223, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    5. Shuai, Jing & Zhao, Yujia & Wang, Yilan & Cheng, Jinhua, 2022. "Renewable energy product competitiveness: Evidence from the United States, China and India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2015. "Growth and competition in renewable energy industries: Insights from an integrated assessment model with strategic firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 13-25.
    7. Nowak, Anna, 2016. "Regional Differences In The Competitiveness Of Farms In Poland," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 41(3).
    8. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Lisa Holden & Tomasz Rokicki, 2022. "The Role of Renewable Energy Sources in Electricity Production in Poland and the Background of Energy Policy of the European Union at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Władysław Szempliński & Bogdan Dubis & Krzysztof Michał Lachutta & Krzysztof Józef Jankowski, 2021. "Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Ivan A. Kapitonov & Irina V. Zhukovskaya & Rustem R. Khusaenov & Valentin A. Monakhov, 2018. "Competitiveness and Competitive Advantages of Enterprises in the Energy Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 300-305.
    11. Rafał Wyszomierski & Piotr Bórawski & Lisa Holden & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko, 2025. "Competitive Potential of Stable Biomass in Poland Compared to the European Union in the Aspect of Sustainability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Timilsina, Govinda R., 2021. "Are renewable energy technologies cost competitive for electricity generation?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 658-672.
    13. Harald Bergsteiner & Gayle Avery, 2012. "When Ethics are Compromised by Ideology: The Global Competitiveness Report," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(4), pages 391-410, September.
    14. Jankowska, Barbara & Staliński, Adam & Trąpczyński, Piotr, 2021. "Public policy support and the competitiveness of the renewable energy sector – The case of Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Zuzana Kapsdorferová & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko & Lisa Holden, 2024. "Perspectives of Electricity Production from Biogas in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Werner Gleißner & Roland Helm & Susanne Kreiter, 2013. "Measurement of competitive advantages and market attractiveness for strategic controlling," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 53-75, May.
    17. Rafał Wyszomierski & Piotr Bórawski & Lisa Holden & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko, 2024. "The Trade of Woody Biomass in the Context of Environmental Economics in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-31, September.
    18. Rabaçal, M. & Fernandes, U. & Costa, M., 2013. "Combustion and emission characteristics of a domestic boiler fired with pellets of pine, industrial wood wastes and peach stones," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 220-226.
    19. Daniel Zbroński & Henryk Otwinowski & Aleksandra Górecka-Zbrońska & Dariusz Urbaniak & Tomasz Wyleciał, 2023. "Analysis of Changes in Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources after Poland’s Accession to Structures of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grzegorz Krawczyk & Pawel Marzec, 2024. "Analyzing Socio-Economic Development and Energy Dynamics Across Polish Voivodeships," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 253-287.
    2. Chwiłkowska-Kubala, Anna & Cyfert, Szymon & Malewska, Kamila & Mierzejewska, Katarzyna & Szumowski, Witold, 2023. "The impact of resources on digital transformation in energy sector companies. The role of readiness for digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Sui, Haiqing & Chen, Jianfeng & Cheng, Wei & Zhu, Youjian & Zhang, Wennan & Hu, Junhao & Jiang, Hao & Shao, Jing'ai & Chen, Hanping, 2024. "Effect of oxidative torrefaction on fuel and pelletizing properties of agricultural biomass in comparison with non-oxidative torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. K. Poehlmann & R. Helm & O. Mauroner & J. Auburger, 2021. "Corporate spin-offs’ success factors: management lessons from a comparative empirical analysis with research-based spin-offs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1767-1796, August.
    5. Arkadiusz Adamczyk, 2020. "Sizing and Control Algorithms of a Hybrid Energy Storage System Based on Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Stachowicz, Paweł & Stolarski, Mariusz J., 2024. "Pellets from mixtures of short rotation coppice with forest-derived biomass: Production costs and energy intensity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    7. Leng, Zhihui & Shuai, Jing & Sun, Han & Shi, Zhiyao & Wang, Zihan, 2020. "Do China's wind energy products have potentials for trade with the “Belt and Road” countries? -- A gravity model approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Kraiem, Nesrine & Jeguirim, Mejdi & Limousy, Lionel & Lajili, Marzouk & Dorge, Sophie & Michelin, Laure & Said, Rachid, 2014. "Impregnation of olive mill wastewater on dry biomasses: Impact on chemical properties and combustion performances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 479-489.
    9. Goraj, Rafał & Kiciński, Marcin & Ślefarski, Rafał & Duczkowska, Anna, 2023. "Validity of decision criteria for selecting power-to-gas projects in Poland," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. de Frutos Cachorro, Julia & Willeghems, Gwen & Buysse, Jeroen, 2020. "Exploring investment potential in a context of nuclear phase-out uncertainty: Perfect vs. imperfect electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Neves, Sónia Almeida & Marques, António Cardoso & de Sá Lopes, Leonardo Batista, 2024. "Is environmental regulation keeping e-waste under control? Evidence from e-waste exports in the European Union," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Hayder M. Kareem Al-Duhaidahawi & Jing Zhang & Mustafa S. Abdulreza & Sinan Abdullah Harjan & Sayyed Sadaqat Hussain Shah, 2019. "The Role of Financial Inclusion and Competitive Advantage: Evidence from Iraqi Islamic Banks," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 193-199.
    13. Qing Guo & Zishan Mai, 2022. "Do Chinese Photovoltaic Products Have Trade Potential in RCEP Countries? A BP Neural-Network-Improved Trade Gravity Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Sungur, Bilal & Basar, Cem & Kaleli, Alirıza, 2023. "Multi-objective optimisation of the emission parameters and efficiency of pellet stove at different supply airflow positions based on machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    15. Jana Sereghyová, 2004. "Konkurenceschopnost Evropské unie v podmínkách globalizace," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2004(3), pages 143-168.
    16. Endriss, Felix & Kuptz, Daniel & Wissmann, Dirk & Hartmann, Hans & Dietz, Elke & Kappler, Andreas & Thorwarth, Harald, 2024. "Impacts on X-ray fluorescence measurements for rapid determination of the chemical composition of renewable solid biofuels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Tianbo Wu & Bin Zhang & Yukun Cao & Pingjun Sun, 2020. "Impact of Multi-Dimensional and Dynamic Distance on China’s Exports of Wooden Forest Products to Countries along the “Belt and Road”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2005. "Catching up: What are the Critical Factors for success?," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20050401, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    20. Babagheibi, Mahsa & Jadid, Shahram & Kazemi, Ahad, 2023. "An Incentive-based robust flexibility market for congestion management of an active distribution system to use the free capacity of Microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    biomass; chances; threats;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:1892-:d:1630510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.