IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1682-d1622019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Internal Flow Uniformity of U-Flow Pattern and Z-Flow Pattern SOFC Stacks Based on Numerical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Yuan Yin

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hannam University, 70 Hannam-ro, Daedeok-gu, Daejeon 34430, Republic of Korea)

  • Kun-Woo Yi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hannam University, 70 Hannam-ro, Daedeok-gu, Daejeon 34430, Republic of Korea)

  • Young-Jin Kim

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hannam University, 70 Hannam-ro, Daedeok-gu, Daejeon 34430, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyeon-Jin Kim

    (Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea)

  • Kyong-Sik Yun

    (Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea)

  • Ji-Haeng Yu

    (Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study analyzes flow uniformity in U-flow pattern and Z-flow pattern solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stacks, assessing their performance under different stack heights and rates of fuel/air usage. Both configurations achieved satisfactory flow distribution uniformity in the anode region at the 1 kWe scale, especially with the Z-flow design demonstrating enhanced stability. However, as stack height increased, particularly at 3 kWe, flow uniformity decreased significantly. In the cathode flow region, uniformity was highly sensitive to changes in air utilization rate, with lower air utilization causing more pronounced reductions in flow uniformity for both stack types. Increasing the height of the stack tends to reduce flow uniformity, whereas higher reactant utilization promotes more uniformity. Moreover, flow uniformity strongly correlates with the pressure drop ratio in the core area, where a higher ratio indicates better uniformity. At 75% fuel utilization, the anode flow region of the U-flow pattern 3 kWe stack exhibited excessively high local fuel utilization in the unit cell with the lowest mass flow rate, implying a risk of fuel depletion due to insufficient supply at that height. Overall, the Z-flow pattern stack showed better performance in the anode flow region, particularly at higher capacities, while the U-flow pattern stack performed slightly better in the cathode flow region under low air utilization conditions. These findings indicate that the Z-flow pattern stack is better suited for high-power applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Yuan Yin & Kun-Woo Yi & Young-Jin Kim & Hyeon-Jin Kim & Kyong-Sik Yun & Ji-Haeng Yu, 2025. "Research on Internal Flow Uniformity of U-Flow Pattern and Z-Flow Pattern SOFC Stacks Based on Numerical Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1682-:d:1622019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashraf, Muhammad Adeel & Rashid, Kashif & Rahimipetroudi, Iman & Kim, Hyeon Jin & Dong, Sang Keun, 2020. "Analyzing different planar biogas-fueled SOFC stack designs and their effects on the flow uniformity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Li, Ang & Song, Ce & Lin, Zijing, 2017. "A multiphysics fully coupled modeling tool for the design and operation analysis of planar solid oxide fuel cell stacks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1234-1244.
    3. Brian C. H. Steele & Angelika Heinzel, 2001. "Materials for fuel-cell technologies," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6861), pages 345-352, November.
    4. Kim, Young Sang & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2020. "System integration and proof-of-concept test results of SOFC–engine hybrid power generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Chen, Daifen & Zeng, Qice & Su, Shichuan & Bi, Wuxi & Ren, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Geometric optimization of a 10-cell modular planar solid oxide fuel cell stack manifold," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1100-1107.
    6. Gong, Chengyuan & Tu, Zhengkai & Hwa Chan, Siew, 2023. "A novel flow field design with flow re-distribution for advanced thermal management in Solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    7. Khazaee, I. & Rava, A., 2017. "Numerical simulation of the performance of solid oxide fuel cell with different flow channel geometries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 235-244.
    8. Miao, Xing-Yuan & Rizvandi, Omid Babaie & Navasa, Maria & Frandsen, Henrik Lund, 2021. "Modelling of local mechanical failures in solid oxide cell stacks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Guk, Erdogan & Venkatesan, Vijay & Babar, Shumaila & Jackson, Lisa & Kim, Jung-Sik, 2019. "Parameters and their impacts on the temperature distribution and thermal gradient of solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 164-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gong, Chengyuan & Tu, Zhengkai & Hwa Chan, Siew, 2023. "A novel flow field design with flow re-distribution for advanced thermal management in Solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    2. Hao Yuan Yin & Kun Woo Yi & Young Jin Kim & Hyeon Jin Kim & Kyong Sik Yun & Ji Haeng Yu, 2024. "Numerical Analysis of Flow in U-Type Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stacks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Miao, Xing-Yuan & Rizvandi, Omid Babaie & Navasa, Maria & Frandsen, Henrik Lund, 2021. "Modelling of local mechanical failures in solid oxide cell stacks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    4. Zeng, Zezhi & Qian, Yuping & Zhang, Yangjun & Hao, Changkun & Dan, Dan & Zhuge, Weilin, 2020. "A review of heat transfer and thermal management methods for temperature gradient reduction in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stacks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Tanaka, T. & Inui, Y. & Pongratz, G. & Subotić, V. & Hochenauer, C., 2021. "Numerical investigation on the performance and detection of an industrial-sized planar solid oxide fuel cell with fuel gas leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Fang, Xiurong & Lin, Zijing, 2018. "Numerical study on the mechanical stress and mechanical failure of planar solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 63-68.
    7. Lee, Wooseok & Lang, Michael & Costa, Remi & Lee, In-Sung & Lee, Young-Sang & Hong, Jongsup, 2025. "Enhancing uniformity and performance in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with double symmetry interconnect design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    8. Guo, Meiting & Ru, Xiao & Yang, Lin & Ni, Meng & Lin, Zijing, 2022. "Effects of methane steam reforming on the mechanical stability of solid oxide fuel cell stack," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    9. Yan, Min & Fu, Pei & Li, Xiang & Zeng, Min & Wang, Qiuwang, 2015. "Mass transfer enhancement of a spiral-like interconnector for planar solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 954-964.
    10. Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Gashoul, Fatemeh, 2017. "Comprehensive investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation for proton exchange membrane fuel ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 614-628.
    11. Sethu Sundar Pethaiah & Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni & Arunkumar Jayakumar & Deepalekshmi Ponnamma & Chandra Sekhar Tiwary & Gangadharan Sasikumar, 2020. "Methanol Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production Using Polymer Electrolyte Membrane: A Mini-Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Mingfei Li & Jingjing Wang & Zhengpeng Chen & Xiuyang Qian & Chuanqi Sun & Di Gan & Kai Xiong & Mumin Rao & Chuangting Chen & Xi Li, 2024. "A Comprehensive Review of Thermal Management in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Focus on Burners, Heat Exchangers, and Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, February.
    13. Sorce, A. & Greco, A. & Magistri, L. & Costamagna, P., 2014. "FDI oriented modeling of an experimental SOFC system, model validation and simulation of faulty states," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 894-908.
    14. Xu, Yuan-wu & Wu, Xiao-long & Zhong, Xiao-bo & Zhao, Dong-qi & Sorrentino, Marco & Jiang, Jianhua & Jiang, Chang & Fu, Xiaowei & Li, Xi, 2021. "Mechanism model-based and data-driven approach for the diagnosis of solid oxide fuel cell stack leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    15. A.M. Shakorfow & A.H. Mohamed, 2024. "Cogeneration Via Solid Oxide Fuel Cells," Acta Chemica Malaysia (ACMY), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 97-106, August.
    16. Gómez, Sergio Yesid & Hotza, Dachamir, 2016. "Current developments in reversible solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 155-174.
    17. Liang, Bo & Yao, Yue & Guo, Jin & Yang, Huazheng & Liang, Jiajiang & Zhao, Zhijiang & Wu, Gang & Zhan, Yuedong & Zhao, Xiaobo & Tao, Tao & Yao, Yingbang & Lu, Shengguo & Ruirui, Zhao, 2022. "Propane-fuelled microtubular solid oxide fuel cell stack electrically connected by an anodic rectangular window," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    18. Karol K. Śreniawski & Maciej Chalusiak & Marcin Moździerz & Janusz S. Szmyd & Grzegorz Brus, 2023. "Transport Phenomena in a Banded Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack—Part 1: Model and Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Fardadi, Mahshid & McLarty, Dustin F. & Jabbari, Faryar, 2016. "Investigation of thermal control for different SOFC flow geometries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 43-55.
    20. Wang, Junye, 2015. "Theory and practice of flow field designs for fuel cell scaling-up: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 640-663.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1682-:d:1622019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.