IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3435-d1691403.html

Leveraging Social Innovation Tools for Advancing Innovative Technologies Towards a Just Energy Transition in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Paraskevi Giourka

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Vasiliki Palla

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Ioannis-Athanasios Zornatzis

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Komninos Angelakoglou

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Georgios Martinopoulos

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece
    Merchant Marine Academy of Macedonia, 57004 Néa Michanióna, Greece)

Abstract

This study investigates the social and economic dimensions of Greece’s energy transition, focusing on the distinct contexts of mainland Western Macedonia and Insular Greece. Utilizing social innovation tools, including the Stakeholder Persona and the Iceberg Model, the research reveals significant regional variations in stakeholder concerns, priorities, and awareness levels regarding energy transition issues. Findings indicate that while Insular Greece prioritizes energy security and public acceptance of renewable energy solutions, mainland Greece emphasizes job security and economic diversification. The study highlights the necessity for tailored energy transition strategies that address local needs and foster community engagement. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of enhancing awareness and understanding of methodologies such as Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis to empower stakeholders in making informed decisions. Integrating insights from various layers of the Iceberg Model, this research provides a framework for developing innovative technologies and policies that support a fair and sustainable energy transition in Greece, ensuring that no community is left behind in the global shift towards sustainability. This comprehensive approach seeks to mitigate environmental impacts but also to create economic opportunities that align with each community’s social and cultural fabric.

Suggested Citation

  • Paraskevi Giourka & Vasiliki Palla & Ioannis-Athanasios Zornatzis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Georgios Martinopoulos, 2025. "Leveraging Social Innovation Tools for Advancing Innovative Technologies Towards a Just Energy Transition in Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3435-:d:1691403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minseo Kim & Hyesu Park & Yeong-wha Sawng & Sun-young Park, 2019. "Bridging the Gap in the Technology Commercialization Process: Using a Three-Stage Technology–Product–Market Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Francisco Adro & Cristina I. Fernandes, 2020. "Social innovation: a systematic literature review and future agenda research," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(1), pages 23-40, March.
    3. Pao-Yu Oei & Hanna Brauers & Philipp Herpich, 2020. "Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out: policies and transition from 1950 to 2018," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 963-979, September.
    4. John K. Kaldellis & Despoina Boulogiorgou & Emilia M. Kondili & Athanasios G. Triantafyllou, 2023. "Green Transition and Electricity Sector Decarbonization: The Case of West Macedonia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Irshaid, Jenan & Mochizuki, Junko & Schinko, Thomas, 2021. "Challenges to local innovation and implementation of low-carbon energy-transition measures: A tale of two Austrian regions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Gruner, Kjell E. & Homburg, Christian, 2000. "Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Ola Söderström & Till Paasche & Francisco Klauser, 2014. "Smart cities as corporate storytelling," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 307-320, June.
    8. Liu, Yipeng, 2020. "The micro-foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Kaldellis, J. K., 2005. "Social attitude towards wind energy applications in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 595-602, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albulut, Koray, 2026. "Addressing social vulnerabilities resulting from low-carbon energy transition policies in EU-27 countries: A systematic survey of the literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PA).
    2. Ebru Tekin Bilbil, 2017. "The Operationalizing Aspects of Smart Cities: the Case of Turkey’s Smart Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 1032-1048, September.
    3. Eleftheriadis, Iordanis M. & Anagnostopoulou, Evgenia G., 2015. "Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 153-164.
    4. Fang, Xingming & Wang, Lu & Sun, Chuanwang & Zheng, Xuemei & Wei, Jing, 2021. "Gap between words and actions: Empirical study on consistency of residents supporting renewable energy development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    5. Leslie Quitzow & Friederike Rohde, 2022. "Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 341-359, February.
    6. Esther Hormiga & Petra Saá-Pérez & Nieves L. Díaz-Díaz & José Luis Ballesteros-Rodríguez & Inmaculada Aguiar-Diaz, 2017. "The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of academic research groups: the mediating role of knowledge sharing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 10-32, February.
    7. Sharifah R.S. DAWOOD, 2023. "The Use Of Quadruple Helix Model In Smart Cities Development: Evidence From Bandar Cassia Township In Penang, Malaysia," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(2), pages 78-100, May.
    8. Baxter, Jamie & Morzaria, Rakhee & Hirsch, Rachel, 2013. "A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 931-943.
    9. Möller, Bernd, 2006. "Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(5), pages 477-494, May.
    10. Bruns, Daniel & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2025. "The Impact of Germany's Coal Phase-Out on Local Property Values," VfS Annual Conference 2025 (Cologne): Revival of Industrial Policy 325450, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Joshua Olusegun FAYOMI, 2016. "The place of the virtual workplaces in developing smart urban centres," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 196-205, November.
    12. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Lill Sarv & Ralf-Martin Soe, 2021. "Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Gruenhagen, Jan Henrik & Terrill, Janice & Cox, Stephen, 2025. "Igniting sparks for the transition of a coal mining region: The role of firm- and system-level agency to innovate, diversify and create new growth paths in a regional innovation system," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Tsoutsos, Theocharis & Tsouchlaraki, Androniki & Tsiropoulos, Manolis & Serpetsidakis, Michalis, 2009. "Visual impact evaluation of a wind park in a Greek island," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 546-553, April.
    16. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Obuobi, Bright & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Citizens' willingness to pay for local anaerobic digestion energy: The influence of altruistic value and knowledge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    17. Liesch, Peter W. & Wilson, Elizabeth J., 2005. "Business-to-business relationship architecture and networks among Australia, New Zealand, and Asian firms: introduction to the special issue," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 168-172, February.
    18. Quitzow, Leslie & Rohde, Friederike, 2022. "Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 341-359.
    19. Zaheer Allam & Ayyoob Sharifi & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    20. Gu Du & An Chen, 2025. "Coal Mine Accident Risk Analysis with Large Language Models and Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-37, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3435-:d:1691403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.