IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3435-d1691403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging Social Innovation Tools for Advancing Innovative Technologies Towards a Just Energy Transition in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Paraskevi Giourka

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Vasiliki Palla

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Ioannis-Athanasios Zornatzis

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Komninos Angelakoglou

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Georgios Martinopoulos

    (Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thermi, Greece
    Merchant Marine Academy of Macedonia, 57004 Néa Michanióna, Greece)

Abstract

This study investigates the social and economic dimensions of Greece’s energy transition, focusing on the distinct contexts of mainland Western Macedonia and Insular Greece. Utilizing social innovation tools, including the Stakeholder Persona and the Iceberg Model, the research reveals significant regional variations in stakeholder concerns, priorities, and awareness levels regarding energy transition issues. Findings indicate that while Insular Greece prioritizes energy security and public acceptance of renewable energy solutions, mainland Greece emphasizes job security and economic diversification. The study highlights the necessity for tailored energy transition strategies that address local needs and foster community engagement. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of enhancing awareness and understanding of methodologies such as Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis to empower stakeholders in making informed decisions. Integrating insights from various layers of the Iceberg Model, this research provides a framework for developing innovative technologies and policies that support a fair and sustainable energy transition in Greece, ensuring that no community is left behind in the global shift towards sustainability. This comprehensive approach seeks to mitigate environmental impacts but also to create economic opportunities that align with each community’s social and cultural fabric.

Suggested Citation

  • Paraskevi Giourka & Vasiliki Palla & Ioannis-Athanasios Zornatzis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Georgios Martinopoulos, 2025. "Leveraging Social Innovation Tools for Advancing Innovative Technologies Towards a Just Energy Transition in Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3435-:d:1691403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John K. Kaldellis & Despoina Boulogiorgou & Emilia M. Kondili & Athanasios G. Triantafyllou, 2023. "Green Transition and Electricity Sector Decarbonization: The Case of West Macedonia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Liu, Yipeng, 2020. "The micro-foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Kaldellis, J. K., 2005. "Social attitude towards wind energy applications in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 595-602, March.
    4. Minseo Kim & Hyesu Park & Yeong-wha Sawng & Sun-young Park, 2019. "Bridging the Gap in the Technology Commercialization Process: Using a Three-Stage Technology–Product–Market Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Francisco Adro & Cristina I. Fernandes, 2020. "Social innovation: a systematic literature review and future agenda research," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(1), pages 23-40, March.
    6. Irshaid, Jenan & Mochizuki, Junko & Schinko, Thomas, 2021. "Challenges to local innovation and implementation of low-carbon energy-transition measures: A tale of two Austrian regions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Gruner, Kjell E. & Homburg, Christian, 2000. "Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Ola Söderström & Till Paasche & Francisco Klauser, 2014. "Smart cities as corporate storytelling," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 307-320, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleftheriadis, Iordanis M. & Anagnostopoulou, Evgenia G., 2015. "Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 153-164.
    2. Sharifah R.S. DAWOOD, 2023. "The Use Of Quadruple Helix Model In Smart Cities Development: Evidence From Bandar Cassia Township In Penang, Malaysia," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(2), pages 78-100, May.
    3. Baxter, Jamie & Morzaria, Rakhee & Hirsch, Rachel, 2013. "A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 931-943.
    4. Quitzow, Leslie & Rohde, Friederike, 2022. "Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 341-359.
    5. Marian Beise, 2004. "Lead Markets, Innovation Differentials and Growth," Discussion Paper Series 157, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    6. Maria Rosario Perello-Marín & Gabriela Ribes-Giner & Odette Pantoja Díaz, 2018. "Enhancing Education for Sustainable Development in Environmental University Programmes: A Co-Creation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Minseo Kim & Seongbae Lim & Yeong-wha Sawng, 2022. "A Study on Growth Engines of Middle Market Enterprise (MME) of Korea Using Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2024. "Demonstrating the need for a just transition: Socioeconomic diagnosis of polish cities living on hard coal mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Ehrenhard, Michel & Wijnhoven, Fons & van den Broek, Tijs & Zinck Stagno, Marc, 2017. "Unlocking how start-ups create business value with mobile applications: Development of an App-enabled Business Innovation Cycle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 26-36.
    10. Georgios K. Vasios & Andreas Y. Troumbis & Yiannis Zevgolis & Maria N. Hatziantoniou & Marios F. Balis, 2019. "Environmental choices in the era of ecological modernization: siting of common interest facilities as a multi-alternative decision field problem in insular setups," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 49-64, March.
    11. Wolsink, Maarten, 2007. "Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 1188-1207, August.
    12. Molnarova, Kristina & Sklenicka, Petr & Stiborek, Jiri & Svobodova, Kamila & Salek, Miroslav & Brabec, Elizabeth, 2012. "Visual preferences for wind turbines: Location, numbers and respondent characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 269-278.
    13. Alexander Brem & Volker Bilgram & Adele Gutstein, 2021. "Involving Lead Users in Innovation: A Structured Summary of Research on the Lead User Method," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Alexander Brem (ed.), Emerging Issues and Trends in INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, chapter 2, pages 21-48, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    14. L. G. Pee, 2016. "Customer co-creation in B2C e-commerce: does it lead to better new products?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 217-243, June.
    15. Mona Treude, 2021. "Sustainable Smart City—Opening a Black Box," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.
    17. Kaldellis, John K. & Zafirakis, D., 2011. "The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1887-1901.
    18. Philip Cooke, 2022. "Beyond the Smart or Resilient City: In Search of Sustainability in the Sojan Thirdspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Malene Freudendal-Pedersen & Sven Kesselring & Eriketti Servou, 2019. "What is Smart for the Future City? Mobilities and Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Suherna & Weksi Budiaji, 2014. "The Impact of customers' relation quality and sensing on the marketing performance for micro industries development in Banten Province, Indonesia," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 147-151, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3435-:d:1691403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.