IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5275-d803474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Zaheer Allam

    (Chaire Entrepreneuriat Territoire Innovation (ETI), IAE Paris—Sorbonne Business School, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 75013 Paris, France
    Live + Smart Research Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
    Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Ayyoob Sharifi

    (Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences & Network for Education and Research on Peace and Sustainability (NERPS), Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8511, Japan
    Center for Peaceful and Sustainable Futures (CEPEAS), IDEC Institute, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan)

  • Simon Elias Bibri

    (Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Sem Saelands Veie 9, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Architecture and Planning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Alfred Getz Vei 3, Sentralbygg 1, 5th Floor, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Didier Chabaud

    (Chaire Entrepreneuriat Territoire Innovation (ETI), IAE Paris—Sorbonne Business School, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 75013 Paris, France)

Abstract

The concept of smart cities peaked in 2015, bringing an increased influx of ‘smart’ devices in the form of the Internet of Things (IoT) and sensors in cities. As a result, interest in smart urban governance has become more prevalent in administrative, organisational, and political circles. This is sustained by both local and global demands for an increased contribution to the goals of sustainability through urban governance processes in response to climate change urgencies. Cities generate up to 70% of global emissions, and in light of societal pressures for more inclusivity and democratic processes, the need for sound urban governance is merited. Further knowledge on the theme of smart urban governance is required to better understand the trends and knowledge structures and better assist policy design. Therefore, this study was undertaken to understand and map the evolution of the concept of smart urban governance through a bibliometric analysis and science mapping techniques using VOSviewer. In total, 1897 articles were retrieved from the Web of Science database over 5 decades, from 1968 to 2021, and divided into three subperiods, namely 1978 to 2015, 2016 to 2019, and 2020 to early 2022. Results indicate that the overall emerging themes across the three periods highlight the need for citizen participation in urban policies, especially in relation to smart cities, and for sustained innovation for e-participation, e-governance, and policy frameworks. The results of this study can aid both researchers exploring the concept of urban governance and policy makers rendering more inclusive urban policies, especially those hosting technological and digital domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaheer Allam & Ayyoob Sharifi & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5275-:d:803474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio & Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan, 2016. "Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 1178-1195.
    2. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López‐Herrera & E. Herrera‐Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    3. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    4. Leonidas G. Anthopoulos, 2017. "Understanding Smart Cities: A Tool for Smart Government or an Industrial Trick?," Public Administration and Information Technology, Springer, number 978-3-319-57015-0, November.
    5. Robert G. Hollands, 2008. "Will the real smart city please stand up?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 303-320, December.
    6. Si Ying Tan & Araz Taeihagh, 2020. "Smart City Governance in Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Peter Howley & Mark Scott & Declan Redmond, 2009. "Sustainability versus liveability: an investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 847-864.
    8. Giuseppe Grossi & Albert Meijer & Massimo Sargiacomo, 2020. "A public management perspective on smart cities: ‘Urban auditing’ for management, governance and accountability," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 633-647, May.
    9. Aditya Dixit & Ramesh Kumar Chidambaram & Zaheer Allam, 2021. "Safety and Risk Analysis of Autonomous Vehicles Using Computer Vision and Neural Networks," Post-Print hal-03477870, HAL.
    10. James Haselip & Ulrich Hansen & Daniel Puig & Sara Trærup & Subash Dhar, 2015. "Governance, enabling frameworks and policies for the transfer and diffusion of low carbon and climate adaptation technologies in developing countries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 363-370, August.
    11. Luca Mora & Roberto Bolici & Mark Deakin, 2017. "The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 3-27, January.
    12. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    13. Corinne Le Quéré & Robert B. Jackson & Matthew W. Jones & Adam J. P. Smith & Sam Abernethy & Robbie M. Andrew & Anthony J. De-Gol & David R. Willis & Yuli Shan & Josep G. Canadell & Pierre Friedlingst, 2020. "Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(7), pages 647-653, July.
    14. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    15. Schulte-Fischedick, Marta & Shan, Yuli & Hubacek, Klaus, 2021. "Implications of COVID-19 lockdowns on surface passenger mobility and related CO2 emission changes in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    16. Erico Przeybilovicz & Maria Alexandra Cunha, 2021. "Government Characteristics to Achieve Smart Urban Governance: From Internal to External Transformation," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Elsa Estevez & Theresa A. Pardo & Hans Jochen Scholl (ed.), Smart Cities and Smart Governance, chapter 3, pages 43-66, Springer.
    17. Sarah Barns, 2021. "Out of the loop? On the radical and the routine in urban big data," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(15), pages 3203-3210, November.
    18. Ola Söderström & Till Paasche & Francisco Klauser, 2014. "Smart cities as corporate storytelling," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 307-320, June.
    19. Zsuzsanna Tomor & Albert Meijer & Ank Michels & Stan Geertman, 2019. "Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 3-27, October.
    20. Allam, Zaheer & Jones, David S., 2020. "Pandemic stricken cities on lockdown. Where are our planning and design professionals [now, then and into the future]?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    21. Luis F. Alvarez León & Jovanna Rosen, 2020. "Technology as Ideology in Urban Governance," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(2), pages 497-506, March.
    22. Babett Kühne & Kai Heidel, 2021. "How Could Smart Cities Use Data? – Towards a Taxonomy of Data-Driven Smart City Projects," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Frederik Ahlemann & Reinhard Schütte & Stefan Stieglitz (ed.), Innovation Through Information Systems, pages 351-366, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability within Attaining Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Digitalization and the Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Antoine Clarinval & Anthony Simonofski & Julie Henry & Benoît Vanderose & Bruno Dumas, 2023. "Introducing the Smart City to Children: Lessons Learned from Hands-On Workshops in Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayyoob Sharifi & Zaheer Allam & Bakhtiar Feizizadeh & Hessam Ghamari, 2021. "Three Decades of Research on Smart Cities: Mapping Knowledge Structure and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-69.
    3. Karimikia, Hadi & Bradshaw, Robert & Singh, Harminder & Ojo, Adegboyega & Donnellan, Brian & Guerin, Michael, 2022. "An emergent taxonomy of boundary spanning in the smart city context – The case of smart Dublin," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Li Zhao & Zhi-ying Tang & Xin Zou, 2019. "Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-28, November.
    5. Battulga Buyannemekh & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2024. "Fostering Smart Citizens: The Role of Public Libraries in Smart City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Bilal Manzoor & Idris Othman & Juan Carlos Pomares, 2021. "Digital Technologies in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry—A Bibliometric—Qualitative Literature Review of Research Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Sha, Kritika & Taeihagh, Araz & De Jong, Martin, 2024. "Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Carè, R. & Weber, O., 2023. "How much finance is in climate finance? A bibliometric review, critiques, and future research directions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Mas-Tur, Alicia & Roig-Tierno, Norat & Sarin, Shikhar & Haon, Christophe & Sego, Trina & Belkhouja, Mustapha & Porter, Alan & Merigó, José M., 2021. "Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and leading authors, institutions and countries in the 50 years of Technological Forecasting and Social Change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Shashi Yadav, 2024. "A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Consumer Ethnocentrism," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, July.
    11. Ana Joana Fernandes & Joao J. Ferreira, 2022. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: a literature review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 189-247, January.
    12. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    13. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    14. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Gallego-Losada, María-Jesús & Montero-Navarro, Antonio & García-Abajo, Elisa & Gallego-Losada, Rocío, 2023. "Digital financial inclusion. Visualizing the academic literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Abdulaziz I. Almulhim & Simon Elias Bibri & Ayyoob Sharifi & Shakil Ahmad & Khalid Mohammed Almatar, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Urbanization and Environmental Sustainability: A Regional Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Lill Sarv & Ralf-Martin Soe, 2021. "Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Hussain, Walayat & Merigó, José M. & Rahimi, Iman & Lev, Benjamin, 2025. "Half a century of Omega – The International Journal of Management Science: A bibliometric analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Reza Naghizadeh & Shaban Elahi & Manoochehr Manteghi & Sepehr Ghazinoory & Marina Ranga, 2015. "Through the magnifying glass: an analysis of regional innovation models based on co-word and meta-synthesis methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2481-2505, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5275-:d:803474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.