IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1800-d1372664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breathing Planet Earth: Analysis of Keeling’s Data on CO 2 and O 2 with Respiratory Quotient (RQ), Part II: Energy-Based Global RQ and CO 2 Budget

Author

Listed:
  • Kalyan Annamalai

    (J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123, USA
    The research topic was conceived and work was carried out solely by the author after learning of Keeling’s curves on CO 2 and O 2 in atm.)

Abstract

For breathing humans, the respiratory quotient (RQ = CO 2 moles released/O 2 mols consumed) ranges from 0.7 to 1.0. In Part I, the literature on the RQ was reviewed and Keeling’s data on atmospheric CO 2 and O 2 concentrations (1991–2018) were used in the estimation of the global RQ as 0.47. A new interpretation of RQ Glob is provided in Part II by treating the planet as a “Hypothetical Biological system (HBS)”. The CO 2 and O 2 balance equations are adopted for estimating (i) energy-based RQ Glob(En) and (ii) the CO 2 distribution in GT/year and % of CO 2 captured by the atmosphere, land, and ocean. The key findings are as follows: (i) The RQ Glob(En) is estimated as 0.35 and is relatively constant from 1991 to 2020. The use of RQ Glob(En) enables the estimation of CO 2 added to the atmosphere from the knowledge of annual fossil fuel (FF) energy data; (ii) The RQ method for the CO 2 budget is validated by comparing the annual CO 2 distribution results with results from more detailed models; (iii) Explicit relations are presented for CO 2 sink in the atmosphere, land, and ocean biomasses, and storage in ocean water from the knowledge of curve fit constants of Keeling’s curves and the RQ of FF and biomasses; (iv) The rate of global average temperature rise (0.27 °C/decade) is predicted using RQ Glob,(En) and the annual energy release rate and compared with the literature data; and (v) Earth’s mass loss in GT and O 2 in the atmosphere are predicted by extrapolating the curve fit to the year 3700. The effect of RQ Glob and RQ FF on the econometry and policy issues is briefly discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalyan Annamalai, 2024. "Breathing Planet Earth: Analysis of Keeling’s Data on CO 2 and O 2 with Respiratory Quotient (RQ), Part II: Energy-Based Global RQ and CO 2 Budget," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-46, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1800-:d:1372664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. del Giorgio & Carlos M. Duarte, 2002. "Respiration in the open ocean," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6914), pages 379-384, November.
    2. Sunke Schmidtko & Lothar Stramma & Martin Visbeck, 2017. "Decline in global oceanic oxygen content during the past five decades," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7641), pages 335-339, February.
    3. Julius J. Andersson, 2019. "Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 1-30, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    2. Kruse, Tobias & Atkinson, Giles, 2022. "Understanding public support for international climate adaptation payments: Evidence from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Katsuyuki Nakano & Ken Yamagishi, 2021. "Impact of Carbon Tax Increase on Product Prices in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Heider, Florian & Inderst, Roman, 2021. "A Corporate Finance Perspective on Environmental Policy," EconStor Preprints 253669, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Runst, Petrik & Höhle, David, 2022. "The German eco tax and its impact on CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Johan Lilliestam & Anthony Patt & Germán Bersalli, 2022. "On the quality of emission reductions: observed effects of carbon pricing on investments, innovation, and operational shifts. A response to van den Bergh and Savin (2021)," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 733-758, November.
    7. Niklas Potrafke & Fabian Ruthardt & Kaspar Wuthrich, 2020. "Protectionism and economic growth: Causal evidence from the first era of globalization," Papers 2010.02378, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    8. Martinsson, Gustav & Sajtos, László & Strömberg, Per & Thomann, Christian, 2022. "Carbon Pricing and Firm-Level CO2 Abatement: Evidence from a Quarter of a Century-Long Panel," Misum Working Paper Series 2022-10, Stockholm School of Economics, Mistra Center for Sustainable Markets (Misum).
    9. Jia, Zhijie & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Angela Köppl & Stefan Schleicher & Margit Schratzenstaller & Karl W. Steininger, 2020. "COVID-19, Klimawandel und Konjunkturpakete," WIFO Research Briefs 1, WIFO.
    11. Mao, Jie & Wang, Chunhua & Yin, Haitao, 2023. "Corporate responses to air quality regulation: Evidence from a regional environmental policy in China," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Egor V. Dudukalov & Galymzhan O. Spabekov & Liudmila V. Kashirskaya & Andrei V. Sevbitov & Olga Yurievna Voronkova & Lidia Vasyutkina, 2020. "Fiscal goals of regulating the activities of the institute of controlled foreign companies in the digital economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 972-983, December.
    13. Runst, Petrik & Thonipara, Anita, 2020. "Dosis facit effectum why the size of the carbon tax matters: Evidence from the Swedish residential sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Jannik Hensel & Giacomo Mangiante & Luca Moretti, 2023. "Carbon Pricing and Inflation Expectations: Evidence from France," CESifo Working Paper Series 10552, CESifo.
    15. Nathan Delacrétaz & Bruno Lanz & Jeremy van Dijk, 2020. "The chicken or the egg: Technology adoption and network infrastructure in the market for electric vehicles," IRENE Working Papers 20-08, IRENE Institute of Economic Research.
    16. Yunzhao, Lu, 2022. "Modelling the role of eco innovation, renewable energy, and environmental taxes in carbon emissions reduction in E−7 economies: Evidence from advance panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 309-318.
    17. Chen, Haojie & Costanza, Robert & Kubiszewski, Ida, 2022. "Legitimacy and limitations of valuing the oxygen production of ecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    18. Hänsel, Martin C. & Franks, Max & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2022. "Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity: A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Gilbert E. Metcalf & James H. Stock, 2023. "The Macroeconomic Impact of Europe's Carbon Taxes," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 265-286, July.
    20. Eisner, Anna & Kulmer, Veronika & Kortschak, Dominik, 2021. "Distributional effects of carbon pricing when considering household heterogeneity: An EASI application for Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1800-:d:1372664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.