IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i5p1048-d1344140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Acidic and Alkaline Pretreatment Techniques for Bioethanol Production from Perennial Grasses

Author

Listed:
  • Lovisa Panduleni Johannes

    (Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1 Chome-3-2 Kagamiyama, Hiroshima 739-0046, Japan)

  • Tran Dang Xuan

    (Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1 Chome-3-2 Kagamiyama, Hiroshima 739-0046, Japan
    The IDEC Institute, Hiroshima University, 1 Chome-3-2 Kagamiyama, Hiroshima 739-0046, Japan
    Faculty of Smart Agriculture, Graduate School of Innovation and Practice for Smart Society, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan)

Abstract

This review paper examines acid and alkaline pretreatments on perennial grasses for second-generation (2G) bioethanol production, a relatively unexplored area in this field. It compares the efficiency of these pretreatments in producing fermentable sugar and bioethanol yield. This study finds that alkaline pretreatment is more effective than acidic pretreatment in removing lignin and increasing sugar yield, leading to higher ethanol yields. However, it is costlier and requires longer reaction times than acidic pretreatment, while acidic pretreatment often leads to the formation of inhibitory compounds at higher temperatures, which is undesirable. The economic and environmental impacts of lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) are also assessed. It is revealed that LCB has a lower carbon but higher water footprint and significant costs due to pretreatment compared to first-generation biofuels. This review further explores artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced technologies in optimizing bioethanol production and identified the gap in literature regarding their application to pretreatment of perennial grasses. This review concludes that although perennial grasses hold promise for 2G bioethanol, the high costs and environmental challenges associated with LCB necessitate further research. This research should focus on integrating AI to optimize the pretreatment of LCB, thereby improving efficiency and sustainability in 2G biofuel production.

Suggested Citation

  • Lovisa Panduleni Johannes & Tran Dang Xuan, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Acidic and Alkaline Pretreatment Techniques for Bioethanol Production from Perennial Grasses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1048-:d:1344140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Negri, Valentina & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Fajardy, Mathilde & Reiner, David M. & Mac Dowell, Niall & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Life cycle optimization of BECCS supply chains in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Jozami, Emiliano & Mele, Fernando D & Piastrellini, Roxana & Civit, Bárbara M & Feldman, Susana R, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of bioenergy from lignocellulosic herbaceous biomass: The case study of Spartina argentinensis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    3. Felix, Erika & Tilley, David R., 2009. "Integrated energy, environmental and financial analysis of ethanol production from cellulosic switchgrass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 410-436.
    4. Nevena Ilić & Marija Milić & Sunčica Beluhan & Suzana Dimitrijević-Branković, 2023. "Cellulases: From Lignocellulosic Biomass to Improved Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Lee, Jechan & Kim, Soosan & You, Siming & Park, Young-Kwon, 2023. "Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-based integrated renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Chen, Yong & Ale, Srinivasulu & Rajan, Nithya & Srinivasan, Raghavan, 2017. "Modeling the effects of land use change from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to perennial bioenergy grasses on watershed hydrology and water quality under changing climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 198-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamás Mizik & Christian Barika Igbeghe & Zsuzsanna Deák, 2025. "Production Efficiency of Advanced Liquid Biofuels: Prospects and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Robyn Jadischke & William David Lubitz, 2025. "Current State of Greenhouse Waste Biomass Disposal Methods, with a Focus on Essex County Ontario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khoo, Hsien H., 2015. "Review of bio-conversion pathways of lignocellulose-to-ethanol: Sustainability assessment based on land footprint projections," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 100-119.
    2. Tilley, David R., 2014. "Exploration of Odum's dynamic emergy accounting rules for suggested refinements," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 279(C), pages 36-44.
    3. Liu, Zhi-Hua & Liu, He & Xu, Tao & Zhao, Zhi-Min & Ragauskas, Arthur J. & Li, Bing-Zhi & Yuan, Joshua S. & Yuan, Ying-Jin, 2025. "Lignin valorization reshapes sustainable biomass refining," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Li, Linjun & Lu, Hongfang & Tilley, David R. & Qiu, Guoyu, 2014. "Effect of time scale on accounting for renewable emergy in ecosystems located in humid and arid climates," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 287(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Saharudin, Djasmine Mastisya & Jeswani, Harish Kumar & Azapagic, Adisa, 2023. "Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECSS): Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of electricity generated from palm oil wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    6. Daniel José Bernier-Oviedo & Alexandra Eugenia Duarte & Óscar J. Sánchez, 2025. "Evaluation and Design of Supply Chains for Bioenergy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-50, April.
    7. Juliana Araújo Pereira & Flávio José Simioni & Juliana Ferreira Soares & Jeane de Almeida do Rosário & Eduardo Bertol & Fabio Murilo Padilha Souza & Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior, 2024. "Circular Economy Practices in Biomass-Fired Power Plants in Brazil: An Assessment Using the ReSOLVE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Yoon, S.-Y. & Han, S.-H. & Shin, S.-J., 2014. "The effect of hemicelluloses and lignin on acid hydrolysis of cellulose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 19-24.
    9. Mathew, Anil Kuruvilla & Chaney, Keith & Crook, Mitch & Humphries, Andrea Claire, 2011. "Dilute acid pre-treatment of oilseed rape straw for bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2424-2432.
    10. Santamaría, Diego & Sánchez, Antonio & Martín, Mariano, 2025. "Scaling down analysis of e-methane production: Advancing towards distributed manufacturing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    11. Velásquez-Arredondo, H.I. & Ruiz-Colorado, A.A. & De Oliveira, S., 2010. "Ethanol production process from banana fruit and its lignocellulosic residues: Energy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3081-3087.
    12. Chen, Yong & Marek, Gary W. & Marek, Thomas H. & Moorhead, Jerry E. & Heflin, Kevin R. & Brauer, David K. & Gowda, Prasanna H. & Srinivasan, Raghavan, 2019. "Simulating the impacts of climate change on hydrology and crop production in the Northern High Plains of Texas using an improved SWAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 13-24.
    13. Agostinho, Feni & Bertaglia, Ana B.B. & Almeida, Cecília M.V.B. & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2015. "Influence of cellulase enzyme production on the energetic–environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 46-56.
    14. Jeon, Kyung-Won & Gong, Ji-Hyeon & Kim, Min-Ju & Shim, Jae-Oh & Jang, Won-Jun & Roh, Hyun-Seog, 2024. "Review on the production of renewable biofuel: Solvent-free deoxygenation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Ramezani, Mohammad & Khazaei, Moein & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Sandoval-Correa, Alejandro & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Turquoise hydrogen and waste optimization: A Bi-objective closed-loop and sustainable supply chain model for a case in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    16. Paudel, Padam Prasad & Kafle, Sagar & Park, Sunyong & Kim, Seok Jun & Cho, Lahoon & Kim, Dae Hyun, 2024. "Advancements in sustainable thermochemical conversion of agricultural crop residues: A systematic review of technical progress, applications, perspectives, and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    17. Edrisi, Sheikh Adil & Sahiba, Sheikh Arshiya & Chen, Bin & Abhilash, P.C., 2022. "Emergy-based sustainability analysis of bioenergy production from marginal and degraded lands of India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    18. Goh, Chun Sheng & Lee, Keat Teong, 2010. "Palm-based biofuel refinery (PBR) to substitute petroleum refinery: An energy and emergy assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2986-2995, December.
    19. Li, Linjun & Lu, Hongfang & Tilley, David R. & Qiu, Guoyu, 2015. "Reprint of “Effect of time scale on accounting for renewable emergy in ecosystems located in humid and arid climates”," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 88-95.
    20. Tilley, David R., 2011. "Dynamic accounting of emergy cycling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3734-3742.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1048-:d:1344140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.