IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9311-d1507275.html

Circular Economy Practices in Biomass-Fired Power Plants in Brazil: An Assessment Using the ReSOLVE Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Juliana Araújo Pereira

    (Department of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, Santa Catarina State University, Av. Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Flávio José Simioni

    (Department of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, Santa Catarina State University, Av. Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Juliana Ferreira Soares

    (Department of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, Santa Catarina State University, Av. Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Jeane de Almeida do Rosário

    (Department of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, Santa Catarina State University, Av. Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Eduardo Bertol

    (Department of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, Santa Catarina State University, Av. Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Fabio Murilo Padilha Souza

    (Department of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, Santa Catarina State University, Av. Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Paraíba, Brazil)

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the adoption of circular economy (CE) practices at thermoelectric power plants (TPPs) fueled by forest biomass in Brazil and determine the degree of implementation; social, environmental, and economic impacts; motivations; challenges; and facilitating factors for the adoption of such practices. Data were collected through a questionnaire applied to a sample of 32 TPPs in Brazil employing the ReSOLVE framework from October 2023 to January 2024. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with the assignment of scores, and principal component analysis. The results indicate that optimization practices are the most widespread (6.7) and sharing practices were the least adopted (4.0). The greatest motivators for adopting CE practices are promoting sustainability (9.5) and enhancing corporate image (9.5). One of the most relevant positive impacts of such practices is the improvement in social relations between companies and the community (9.1). A major challenge to CE adoption is government neglect, whereas certification systems constitute one of the major facilitators (with 20 indications). This study provides indicators for decision-makers in the private sector and public managers interested in promoting sustainable practices in the renewable energy industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliana Araújo Pereira & Flávio José Simioni & Juliana Ferreira Soares & Jeane de Almeida do Rosário & Eduardo Bertol & Fabio Murilo Padilha Souza & Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior, 2024. "Circular Economy Practices in Biomass-Fired Power Plants in Brazil: An Assessment Using the ReSOLVE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9311-:d:1507275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brent Kurapatskie & Nicole Darnall, 2013. "Which Corporate Sustainability Activities are Associated with Greater Financial Payoffs?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 49-61, January.
    2. Yekini Suberu, Mohammed & Wazir Mustafa, Mohd & Bashir, Nouruddeen, 2014. "Energy storage systems for renewable energy power sector integration and mitigation of intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 499-514.
    3. Arpit Singh & Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Anurag Chauhan, 2024. "A framework to model the performance indicators of resilient construction supply chain: An effort toward attaining sustainability and circular practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1688-1720, March.
    4. Carlos Scheel & Eduardo Aguiñaga & Bernardo Bello, 2020. "Decoupling Economic Development from the Consumption of Finite Resources Using Circular Economy. A Model for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Sarkis, Joseph & Filho, Moacir Godinho, 2019. "Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 546-552.
    6. Marzena Smol & Paulina Marcinek & Joanna Duda, 2024. "Circular Business Models (CBMs) in Environmental Management—Analysis of Definitions, Typologies and Methods of Creation in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Simone Sehnem & Adriane A. Farias S. L. de Queiroz & Susana Carla Farias Pereira & Gabriel dos Santos Correia & Edson Kuzma, 2022. "Circular economy and innovation: A look from the perspective of organizational capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 236-250, January.
    8. M.A.P. Pinheiro & D. Jugend & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & C.J. Chiappetta Jabbour & H. Latan, 2022. "Circular Economy-Based New Products and Company Performance: The Role of Stakeholders and Industry 4.0 Technologies," Post-Print hal-04276066, HAL.
    9. Longo, Sonia & Cellura, Maurizio & Luu, Le Quyen & Nguyen, Thanh Quang & Rincione, Roberta & Guarino, Francesco, 2024. "Circular economy and life cycle thinking applied to the biomass supply chain: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    11. Lee, Jechan & Kim, Soosan & You, Siming & Park, Young-Kwon, 2023. "Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-based integrated renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Muhammad Ashraf & Adnan Arshad & Praharsh M. Patel & Adeel Khan & Huma Qamar & Ristina Siti-Sundari & Muhammad Usman Ghani & Ali Amin & Jamilur Rehman Babar, 2021. "Quantifying climate-induced drought risk to livelihood and mitigation actions in Balochistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2127-2151, December.
    13. Farayi Musharavati & Khadija Sajid & Izza Anwer & Abdul-Sattar Nizami & Muhammad Hassan Javed & Anees Ahmad & Muhammad Naqvi, 2023. "Advancing Biodiesel Production System from Mixed Vegetable Oil Waste: A Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental and Economic Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Nagendra Kumar Sharma & Kannan Govindan & Kuei Kuei Lai & Wen Kuo Chen & Vimal Kumar, 2021. "The transition from linear economy to circular economy for sustainability among SMEs: A study on prospects, impediments, and prerequisites," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1803-1822, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luiz Moreira Coelho Junior & Anna Manuella Melo Nunes & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & Flávio José Simioni & Emmanuel Damilano Dutra & Everardo Valadares de Sá Barretto Sampaio, 2025. "Forest-Based Power Plants In Brazil: Empirical Evidence For A Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(6), pages 5149-5170, November.
    2. Coelho Junior, Luiz Moreira & Araújo, Adriano Firmino Valdevino de & Nunes, Anna Manuella Melo & Fuinhas, José Alberto & Santos Júnior, Edvaldo Pereira, 2026. "Regional efficiency of forest-based bioelectricity in Brazil: A DEA and jackstrap approach for low-carbon bioeconomy planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naila Erum & Kazi Musa & Saira Tufail & Jamaliah Said & Nor Balkish Zakaria, 2025. "Impact of the circular economy on human development: evidence from Germany," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 30385-30410, December.
    2. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Ángela Triguero & María C. Cuerva & Francisco J. Sáez‐Martínez, 2022. "Closing the loop through eco‐innovation by European firms: Circular economy for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2337-2350, July.
    4. Tarlan Ahmadov & Susanne Durst & Wolfgang Gerstlberger & Elisabeth Kraut, 2025. "SMEs on the way to a circular economy: insights from a multi-perspective review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 289-322, February.
    5. Sarmistha Mishra & Dukhabandhu Sahoo & Souryabrata Mohapatra, 2024. "Circular economy adoption in MSMEs: unveiling enablers and barriers," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 237-263, November.
    6. Triguero, A. & Córcoles, D., 2025. "Leveraging eco-innovation and market knowledge for a circular economy transition: Insights from Spanish manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Dat Dao & Cuong Nguyen, 2025. "Application of the PLS-SEM Model in Assessing the Sustainable Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    8. Mohammad Mousa Mousa & Heyam Abdulrahman Al Moosa & Issam Naim Ayyash & Fandi Omeish & Imed Zaiem & Thamer Alzahrani & Samiha Mjahed Hammami & Ahmad M. Zamil, 2025. "Big Data Analytics as a Driver for Sustainable Performance: The Role of Green Supply Chain Management in Advancing Circular Economy in Saudi Arabian Pharmaceutical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Rodrigues Dias, Veruska Mazza & Jugend, Daniel & de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Razzino, Carlos do Amaral & Paula Pinheiro, Marco Antonio, 2022. "Possibilities for applying the circular economy in the aerospace industry: Practices, opportunities and challenges," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Cui, Yongfeng & Liu, Wei & Rani, Pratibha & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Biman Darshana Hettiarachchi & Stefan Seuring & Marcus Brandenburg, 2022. "Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 858-878, December.
    12. Manish Mohan Baral & U. V. Adinarayana Rao & K. Srinivasa Rao & Girish Chandra Dey & Subhodeep Mukherjee & M. Arun Kumar, 2023. "Achieving Sustainability of SMEs Through Industry 4.0-Based Circular Economy," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 128-144, December.
    13. Dragan, George Bogdan & Arfi, Wissal Ben & Tiberius, Victor & Ammari, Aymen & Ferasso, Marcos, 2024. "Acceptance of circular entrepreneurship: Employees’ perceptions on organizations’ transition to the circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Valérie Lacombe & Juste Rajaonson, 2025. "Strategic Dynamics of Circular Economy Initiatives in Food Systems: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Hermann, Roberto Rivas & Pansera, Mario & Nogueira, Leticia Antunes & Monteiro, Marko, 2022. "Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    16. Huynh Evertsen, Phuc & Rasmussen, Einar & Nenadic, Oleg, 2022. "Commercializing circular economy innovations: A taxonomy of academic spin-offs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Anja Eisenreich & Johann Füller & Martin Stuchtey, 2021. "Open Circular Innovation: How Companies Can Develop Circular Innovations in Collaboration with Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Animesh Ghosh & Prabha Bhola & Uthayasankar Sivarajah, 2022. "Emerging Associates of the Circular Economy: Analysing Interactions and Trends by a Mixed Methods Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-41, August.
    19. Sehrish Atif & Shehzad Ahmed & Muhammad Wasim & Bassam Zeb & Zeeshan Pervez & Lorraine Quinn, 2021. "Towards a Conceptual Development of Industry 4.0, Servitisation, and Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, June.
    20. Benedetta Esposito & Daniela Sica & Stefania Supino & Ornella Malandrino, 2024. "Measuring the impact of circular economy performance on financial performance: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5109-5126, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9311-:d:1507275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.