IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i22p5658-d1519465.html

Electrical and Financial Impacts of Inverter Clipping on Oversized Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Thunchanok Kaewnukultorn

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)

  • Sergio Basilio Sepúlveda-Mora

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
    Departamento de Electricidad y Electrónica, Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Cucuta 540006, Colombia)

  • Ryan Purnell

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)

  • Steven Hegedus

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)

Abstract

This paper studies the impacts of inverter clipping on bifacial PV modules under different weather and ground reflectivity. A 5 kW bifacial array was connected to a 3.8 kW grid-tied inverter, a 10 kWh Li-ion battery, and an EV charger. A PV output calculation model was developed to compare the estimated output of the modules with the actual measurements to evaluate the relation between ground reflectivity and clipping loss. The results showed that clipping potentially occurs on sunny days in summer from 10:00 to 15:00 during the period with the highest solar irradiance. Three colors of ground cover were also examined to compare the performance of bifacial modules under different albedo reflective properties. The results indicated that the white ground in winter leads to the highest bifacial gain (13.1%) and daily DC efficiency (22.2%) due to the combination of high reflectivity with low solar angle giving maximum upward reflection of direct sunlight. This same combination shows a minimal advantage in summer due to the clipping. The proposed model is evaluated, demonstrating 98.2% agreement between modeled and actual data for all conditions. Furthermore, simulation models based on the actual system with different system sizes and ground reflectivities have been studied to evaluate the impacts of the clipping in terms of technical losses and financial returns. The analysis shows that a high reflective ground condition can provide the best financial benefit, and the clipping loss does not have a great effect on the finance of the project since the loss is less than 4% of the annual production even in an extreme case.

Suggested Citation

  • Thunchanok Kaewnukultorn & Sergio Basilio Sepúlveda-Mora & Ryan Purnell & Steven Hegedus, 2024. "Electrical and Financial Impacts of Inverter Clipping on Oversized Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5658-:d:1519465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jouttijärvi, Sami & Lobaccaro, Gabriele & Kamppinen, Aleksi & Miettunen, Kati, 2022. "Benefits of bifacial solar cells combined with low voltage power grids at high latitudes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Mondol, Jayanta Deb & Yohanis, Yigzaw G & Norton, Brian, 2009. "Optimising the economic viability of grid-connected photovoltaic systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 985-999, July.
    3. Good, Jeremy & Johnson, Jeremiah X., 2016. "Impact of inverter loading ratio on solar photovoltaic system performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 475-486.
    4. Notton, G. & Lazarov, V. & Stoyanov, L., 2010. "Optimal sizing of a grid-connected PV system for various PV module technologies and inclinations, inverter efficiency characteristics and locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 541-554.
    5. Balfour, John & Hill, Roger & Walker, Andy & Robinson, Gerald & Gunda, Thushara & Desai, Jal, 2021. "Masking of photovoltaic system performance problems by inverter clipping and other design and operational practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Appelbaum, J., 2016. "Bifacial photovoltaic panels field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 338-343.
    7. Ramli, Makbul A.M. & Hiendro, Ayong & Sedraoui, Khaled & Twaha, Ssennoga, 2015. "Optimal sizing of grid-connected photovoltaic energy system in Saudi Arabia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 489-495.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irene Del Hierro López & Nuria Martín-Chivelet & Jesús Polo & Lorenzo Olivieri, 2025. "Renovation of Typological Clusters with Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, H.X. & Muñoz-García, M.A. & Moreda, G.P. & Alonso-García, M.C., 2018. "Optimum inverter sizing of grid-connected photovoltaic systems based on energetic and economic considerations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 709-717.
    2. Hatice Gül Sezgin-Ugranlı, 2025. "Photovoltaic System Performance Under Partial Shading Conditions: Insight into the Roles of Bypass Diode Numbers and Inverter Efficiency Curve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Khezri, Rahmat & Mahmoudi, Amin & Aki, Hirohisa, 2022. "Optimal planning of solar photovoltaic and battery storage systems for grid-connected residential sector: Review, challenges and new perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Diogo Cabral & Abolfazl Hayati & João Gomes & Hossein Afzali Gorouh & Pouriya Nasseriyan & Mazyar Salmanzadeh, 2023. "Experimental Electrical Assessment Evaluation of a Vertical n-PERT Half-Size Bifacial Solar Cell String Receiver on a Parabolic Trough Solar Collector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Ruan, Tianqi & Laumert, Björn & Wang, Wujun, 2026. "Techno-economic analysis of urban bifacial PV in high-latitude area," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Camps, Xavier & Velasco, Guillermo & de la Hoz, Jordi & Martín, Helena, 2015. "Contribution to the PV-to-inverter sizing ratio determination using a custom flexible experimental setup," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 35-45.
    7. Sánchez Reinoso, Carlos R. & Milone, Diego H. & Buitrago, Román H., 2013. "Simulation of photovoltaic centrals with dynamic shading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 278-289.
    8. Ramli, Makbul A.M. & Hiendro, Ayong & Sedraoui, Khaled & Twaha, Ssennoga, 2015. "Optimal sizing of grid-connected photovoltaic energy system in Saudi Arabia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 489-495.
    9. Micheli, Leonardo & Muller, Matthew & Theristis, Marios & Smestad, Greg P. & Almonacid, Florencia & Fernández, Eduardo F., 2024. "Quantifying the impact of inverter clipping on photovoltaic performance and soiling losses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Pillot, Benjamin & de Siqueira, Sandro & Dias, João Batista, 2018. "Grid parity analysis of distributed PV generation using Monte Carlo approach: The Brazilian case," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 974-988.
    11. Lang, Tillmann & Gloerfeld, Erik & Girod, Bastien, 2015. "Don׳t just follow the sun – A global assessment of economic performance for residential building photovoltaics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 932-951.
    12. Good, Jeremy & Johnson, Jeremiah X., 2016. "Impact of inverter loading ratio on solar photovoltaic system performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 475-486.
    13. Tekai Eddine Khalil Zidane & Mohd Rafi Adzman & Mohammad Faridun Naim Tajuddin & Samila Mat Zali & Ali Durusu & Saad Mekhilef, 2020. "Optimal Design of Photovoltaic Power Plant Using Hybrid Optimisation: A Case of South Algeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, June.
    14. Rahimat O. Yakubu & Maame T. Ankoh & Lena D. Mensah & David A. Quansah & Muyiwa S. Adaramola, 2022. "Predicting the Potential Energy Yield of Bifacial Solar PV Systems in Low-Latitude Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Rehman, Shafiqur & Ahmed, M.A. & Mohamed, Mohand H. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Feasibility study of the grid connected 10MW installed capacity PV power plants in Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 319-329.
    16. Perez-Gallardo, J.R. & Azzaro-Pantel, C. & Astier, S. & Domenech, S. & Aguilar-Lasserre, A., 2014. "Ecodesign of photovoltaic grid-connected systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 82-97.
    17. Bhatt, Ankit & Sharma, M.P. & Saini, R.P., 2016. "Feasibility and sensitivity analysis of an off-grid micro hydro–photovoltaic–biomass and biogas–diesel–battery hybrid energy system for a remote area in Uttarakhand state, India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 53-69.
    18. Formolli, M. & Kleiven, T. & Lobaccaro, G., 2023. "Assessing solar energy accessibility at high latitudes: A systematic review of urban spatial domains, metrics, and parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    19. Aste, Niccolò & Del Pero, Claudio & Leonforte, Fabrizio & Manfren, Massimiliano, 2013. "A simplified model for the estimation of energy production of PV systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 503-512.
    20. Parlikar, Anupam & Truong, Cong Nam & Jossen, Andreas & Hesse, Holger, 2021. "The carbon footprint of island grids with lithium-ion battery systems: An analysis based on levelized emissions of energy supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5658-:d:1519465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.