IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i18p4722-d1483041.html

Preliminary Techno-Economic Study of Optimized Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Substructure

Author

Listed:
  • Adebayo Ojo

    (Department of Naval Architecture Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK)

  • Maurizio Collu

    (Department of Naval Architecture Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK)

  • Andrea Coraddu

    (Department of Maritime & Transport Technology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherland)

Abstract

Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) are still in the pre-commercial stage and, although different concepts of FOWTs are being developed, cost is a main barrier to commercializing the FOWT system. This article aims to use a shape parameterization technique within a multidisciplinary design analysis and optimization framework to alter the shape of the FOWT platform with the objective of reducing cost. This cost reduction is then implemented in 30 MW and 60 MW floating offshore wind farms (FOWFs) designed based on the static pitch angle constraints (5 degrees, 7 degrees and 10 degrees) used within the optimization framework to estimate the reduction in the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) in comparison to a FOWT platform without any shape alteration–OC3 spar platform design. Key findings in this work show that an optimal shape alteration of the platform design that satisfies the design requirements, objectives and constraints set within the optimization framework contributes to significantly reducing the CAPEX cost and the LCOE in the floating wind farms considered. This is due to the reduction in the required platform mass for hydrostatic stability when the static pitch angle is increased. The FOWF designed with a 10 degree static pitch angle constraint provided the lowest LCOE value, while the FOWF designed with a 5 degree static pitch angle constraint provided the largest LCOE value, barring the FOWT designed with the OC3 dimension, which is considered to have no inclination.

Suggested Citation

  • Adebayo Ojo & Maurizio Collu & Andrea Coraddu, 2024. "Preliminary Techno-Economic Study of Optimized Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Substructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4722-:d:1483041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Findler, Nicholas V. & Lo, Cher & Lo, Ron, 1987. "Pattern search for optimization," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 41-50.
    2. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2016. "Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 866-880.
    3. Myhr, Anders & Bjerkseter, Catho & Ågotnes, Anders & Nygaard, Tor A., 2014. "Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbines in a life cycle perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 714-728.
    4. Kaldellis, J.K. & Apostolou, D. & Kapsali, M. & Kondili, E., 2016. "Environmental and social footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 543-556.
    5. Maienza, C. & Avossa, A.M. & Ricciardelli, F. & Coiro, D. & Troise, G. & Georgakis, C.T., 2020. "A life cycle cost model for floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    6. Aldersey-Williams, John & Broadbent, Ian D. & Strachan, Peter A., 2020. "Analysis of United Kingdom offshore wind farm performance using public data: Improving the evidence base for policymaking," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delmaria Richards & Helmut Yabar & Takeshi Mizunoya & Randy Koon Koon & Gia Hong Tran & Yannick Esopere, 2024. "Balancing Stakeholders’ Perspectives for Sustainability: GIS-MCDM for Onshore Wind Energy Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-41, November.
    2. Qiao, Yanhui & Fang, Jianju, 2025. "Full system universal upscaling method for semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Ibrahim Engin Taze & Md Armanul Hoda & Irene Miquelez & Payton Maddaloni & Saeed Eftekhar Azam, 2025. "A Review of Digital Twinning Applications for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines: Insights, Innovations, and Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-42, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J., 2022. "Operation and maintenance for floating wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Yanez-Rosales, Pablo & Río-Gamero, B. Del & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta, 2024. "Rationale for selecting the most suitable areas for offshore wind energy farms in isolated island systems. Case study: Canary Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Ren, Nianxin & Ma, Zhe & Shan, Baohua & Ning, Dezhi & Ou, Jinping, 2020. "Experimental and numerical study of dynamic responses of a new combined TLP type floating wind turbine and a wave energy converter under operational conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 966-974.
    5. Wan, Ling & Moan, Torgeir & Gao, Zhen & Shi, Wei, 2024. "A review on the technical development of combined wind and wave energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    6. Laura Castro-Santos & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso, 2019. "A Software for Calculating the Economic Aspects of Floating Offshore Renewable Energies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Tawil, Tony El & Charpentier, Jean Frédéric & Benbouzid, Mohamed, 2018. "Sizing and rough optimization of a hybrid renewable-based farm in a stand-alone marine context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1134-1143.
    8. Laura Castro-Santos & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso & Carlos Álvarez-Feal & Luis Carral, 2018. "Influence of Size on the Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wind Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Clark, Caitlyn E. & Miller, Annalise & DuPont, Bryony, 2019. "An analytical cost model for co-located floating wind-wave energy arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 885-897.
    10. Sergi Vilajuana Llorente & José Ignacio Rapha & José Luis Domínguez-García, 2024. "Development and Analysis of a Global Floating Wind Levelised Cost of Energy Map," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, September.
    11. Laura Castro-Santos & Ana Rute Bento & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2020. "The Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wave Energy Farms in the North of Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Jalili, Shahin & Cauvin, Samuel R. & Kapitaniak, Marcin & Neilson, Richard, 2025. "Multi-criteria decision-making for offshore wind farm decommissioning: Lessons from the oil and gas sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
    13. Han, Zhi & Wei, Zhiwen & Tao, Ji & Cao, Feifei & Shi, Hongda, 2025. "Experimental study on power matrix and energy capture spectrum of a wind-wave hybrid system under random wave conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    14. Gao, Qiang & Yuan, Rui & Ertugrul, Nesimi & Ding, Boyin & Hayward, Jennifer A. & Li, Ye, 2023. "Analysis of energy variability and costs for offshore wind and hybrid power unit with equivalent energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    15. Centeno-Telleria, Manu & Yue, Hong & Carrol, James & Penalba, Markel & Aizpurua, Jose I., 2024. "Impact of operations and maintenance on the energy production of floating offshore wind farms across the North Sea and the Iberian Peninsula," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    16. Nurullah Yildiz & Hassan Hemida & Charalampos Baniotopoulos, 2024. "Operation, Maintenance, and Decommissioning Cost in Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Gao, Qiang & Hayward, Jennifer A. & Sergiienko, Nataliia & Khan, Salman Saeed & Hemer, Mark & Ertugrul, Nesimi & Ding, Boyin, 2024. "Detailed mapping of technical capacities and economics potential of offshore wind energy: A case study in South-eastern Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    18. Devoy McAuliffe, Fiona & Judge, Frances M. & Murphy, Jimmy, 2024. "Modelling the installation of next generation floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    19. Ophelie Choupin & Michael Henriksen & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodger Tomlinson, 2021. "Breaking-Down and Parameterising Wave Energy Converter Costs Using the CapEx and Similitude Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.
    20. Enrico Giglio & Ermando Petracca & Bruno Paduano & Claudio Moscoloni & Giuseppe Giorgi & Sergej Antonello Sirigu, 2023. "Estimating the Cost of Wave Energy Converters at an Early Design Stage: A Bottom-Up Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-39, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4722-:d:1483041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.