IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v399y2025ics0306261925012590.html

Multi-criteria decision-making for offshore wind farm decommissioning: Lessons from the oil and gas sector

Author

Listed:
  • Jalili, Shahin
  • Cauvin, Samuel R.
  • Kapitaniak, Marcin
  • Neilson, Richard

Abstract

The current decision-making process for offshore wind farm (OWF) decommissioning projects in the UK continental shelf (UKCS) is primarily based on the economic aspects. It aims specifically to secure an appropriate form of financial guarantee from developers to ensure they can finance the decommissioning and that assets will not be abandoned on the seabed at the end of their operational lifetime. However, OWF decommissioning projects have environmental, technical, safety, and societal impacts, hence necessitating the development of a multi-criteria decision-making approach. This study proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework, adapted from the comparative assessment (CA) process used in the oil and gas (O&G) decommissioning sector, in which the economic, environmental, and safety criteria are considered to evaluate each decommissioning option. To assess these, bottom-up impact assessment formulations are developed in which detailed site-specific and operational parameters are considered. The Gunfleet Sands OWF in the North Sea is assessed as an exemplar decommissioning case study. The results produced by the proposed MCDM framework are visualised using an immersive marine simulator, which serves as an effective stakeholder engagement platform for OWF decommissioning projects. The study offers valuable insights into the sustainability, safety, and financial implications of various OWF decommissioning scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalili, Shahin & Cauvin, Samuel R. & Kapitaniak, Marcin & Neilson, Richard, 2025. "Multi-criteria decision-making for offshore wind farm decommissioning: Lessons from the oil and gas sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012590
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925012590
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jalili, Shahin & Maheri, Alireza & Ivanovic, Ana & Neilson, Richard & Bentin, Marcus & Kotzur, Stephan & May, Roger & Sünner, Isabel, 2024. "Economic and environmental assessments to support the decision-making process in the offshore wind farm decommissioning projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    2. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2020. "Stochastic financial appraisal of offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1176-1191.
    3. Kaiser, Mark J. & Snyder, Brian, 2012. "Modeling the decommissioning cost of offshore wind development on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 153-164, January.
    4. Maienza, C. & Avossa, A.M. & Ricciardelli, F. & Coiro, D. & Troise, G. & Georgakis, C.T., 2020. "A life cycle cost model for floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Myhr, Anders & Bjerkseter, Catho & Ågotnes, Anders & Nygaard, Tor A., 2014. "Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbines in a life cycle perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 714-728.
    6. Topham, Eva & McMillan, David & Bradley, Stuart & Hart, Edward, 2019. "Recycling offshore wind farms at decommissioning stage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 698-709.
    7. Kern, Florian & Smith, Adrian & Shaw, Chris & Raven, Rob & Verhees, Bram, 2014. "From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 635-646.
    8. Mackie, Colin & Velenturf, Anne P.M., 2021. "Trouble on the horizon: Securing the decommissioning of offshore renewable energy installations in UK waters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Terrero-Gonzalez, Alicia & Dai, Saishuai & Neilson, Richard D. & Papadopoulos, Jim & Kapitaniak, Marcin, 2024. "Dynamic response of a shallow-draft floating wind turbine concept: Experiments and modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Florian Kern & Adrian Smith & Chris Shaw & Rob Raven & Bram Verhees, 2014. "From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK," SPRU Working Paper Series 2014-02, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    11. Danovaro, Roberto & Bianchelli, Silvia & Brambilla, Paola & Brussa, Gaia & Corinaldesi, Cinzia & Del Borghi, Adriana & Dell’Anno, Antonio & Fraschetti, Simonetta & Greco, Silvestro & Grosso, Mario & N, 2024. "Making eco-sustainable floating offshore wind farms: Siting, mitigations, and compensations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dinsing, Philipp & Kilic, Onur A. & Veldman, Jasper & Hicks, Christian, 2025. "The impact of seasonality on offshore wind farm decommissioning projects - A case study in the North Sea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Anne P. M. Velenturf, 2021. "A Framework and Baseline for the Integration of a Sustainable Circular Economy in Offshore Wind," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-41, September.
    3. Shamsan Alsubal & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Eu Lim Shawn & M. S. Liew & Pavitirakumar Palaniappan & Muhammad Ali Musarat, 2021. "Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm: Kudat Malaysia Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Judge, Frances & McAuliffe, Fiona Devoy & Sperstad, Iver Bakken & Chester, Rachel & Flannery, Brian & Lynch, Katie & Murphy, Jimmy, 2019. "A lifecycle financial analysis model for offshore wind farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 370-383.
    5. Geels, Frank W. & Kern, Florian & Fuchs, Gerhard & Hinderer, Nele & Kungl, Gregor & Mylan, Josephine & Neukirch, Mario & Wassermann, Sandra, 2016. "The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 896-913.
    6. Mäkitie, Tuukka & Normann, Håkon E. & Thune, Taran M. & Sraml Gonzalez, Jakoba, 2019. "The green flings: Norwegian oil and gas industry’s engagement in offshore wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 269-279.
    7. Geels, Frank W. & Ayoub, Martina, 2023. "A socio-technical transition perspective on positive tipping points in climate change mitigation: Analysing seven interacting feedback loops in offshore wind and electric vehicles acceleration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Lowes, Richard & Woodman, Bridget, 2020. "Disruptive and uncertain: Policy makers’ perceptions on UK heat decarbonisation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Yanez-Rosales, Pablo & Río-Gamero, B. Del & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta, 2024. "Rationale for selecting the most suitable areas for offshore wind energy farms in isolated island systems. Case study: Canary Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    10. McMeekin, Andrew & Geels, Frank W. & Hodson, Mike, 2019. "Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: Analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system (1990–2016)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1216-1231.
    11. Stuti Haldar, 2022. "A landscape level analysis of entrepreneurship and sustainable energy transitions: Evidences from Gujarat, India," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 489-502, August.
    12. Tyfield, David & Zuev, Dennis, 2018. "Stasis, dynamism and emergence of the e-mobility system in China: A power relational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 259-270.
    13. He, Ziqi & Xu, Wanhai & Sun, Yumeng & Zhang, Xinrui, 2025. "A GIS-based techno-economic comparative assessment of offshore fixed and floating photovoltaic systems: A case study of Hainan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 391(C).
    14. Stefan Ćetković & Aron Buzogány & Miranda Schreurs, 2016. "Varieties of clean energy transitions in Europe: Political-economic foundations of onshore and offshore wind development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-18, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Ćetković, Stefan & Buzogány, Aron, 2020. "Between markets, politics and path-dependence: Explaining the growth of solar and wind power in six Central and Eastern European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. John Aldersey-Williams & Peter A. Strachan & Ian D. Broadbent, 2020. "Validating the “Seven Functions” Model of Technological Innovations Systems Theory with Industry Stakeholders—A Review from UK Offshore Renewables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Mingyu Li & Dongxiao Niu & Zhengsen Ji & Xiwen Cui & Lijie Sun, 2021. "Forecast Research on Multidimensional Influencing Factors of Global Offshore Wind Power Investment Based on Random Forest and Elastic Net," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Kivimaa, Paula & Kern, Florian, 2016. "Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 205-217.
    19. Gallaher, Adam & Graziano, Marcello & Axon, Stephen & Bertana, Amanda, 2023. "Breaking wind: A comparison between U.S. and European approaches in offshore wind energy leadership in the North Atlantic region," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Amélie Têtu & Julia Fernandez Chozas, 2021. "A Proposed Guidance for the Economic Assessment of Wave Energy Converters at Early Development Stages," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.