IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v399y2025ics0306261925012590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria decision-making for offshore wind farm decommissioning: Lessons from the oil and gas sector

Author

Listed:
  • Jalili, Shahin
  • Cauvin, Samuel R.
  • Kapitaniak, Marcin
  • Neilson, Richard

Abstract

The current decision-making process for offshore wind farm (OWF) decommissioning projects in the UK continental shelf (UKCS) is primarily based on the economic aspects. It aims specifically to secure an appropriate form of financial guarantee from developers to ensure they can finance the decommissioning and that assets will not be abandoned on the seabed at the end of their operational lifetime. However, OWF decommissioning projects have environmental, technical, safety, and societal impacts, hence necessitating the development of a multi-criteria decision-making approach. This study proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework, adapted from the comparative assessment (CA) process used in the oil and gas (O&G) decommissioning sector, in which the economic, environmental, and safety criteria are considered to evaluate each decommissioning option. To assess these, bottom-up impact assessment formulations are developed in which detailed site-specific and operational parameters are considered. The Gunfleet Sands OWF in the North Sea is assessed as an exemplar decommissioning case study. The results produced by the proposed MCDM framework are visualised using an immersive marine simulator, which serves as an effective stakeholder engagement platform for OWF decommissioning projects. The study offers valuable insights into the sustainability, safety, and financial implications of various OWF decommissioning scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalili, Shahin & Cauvin, Samuel R. & Kapitaniak, Marcin & Neilson, Richard, 2025. "Multi-criteria decision-making for offshore wind farm decommissioning: Lessons from the oil and gas sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012590
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925012590
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.