IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i9p3948-d1141654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Masks Generated in the EU during COVID-19 Pandemic into Energy Products

Author

Listed:
  • Samy Yousef

    (Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51424 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Vidas Lekavičius

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, Laboratory of Energy Systems Research, Breslaujos 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Nerijus Striūgas

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, Laboratory of Combustion Processes, Breslaujos 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 24 billion pieces of surgical mask waste (WM) were generated in the EU region, with an acute shortage of their management and recycling. Pyrolysis and gasification are among the most promising treatments that were proposed to dispose of WMs and convert them into pyrolysis oil and hydrogen-rich syngas. This work aimed to investigate the techno-economic analysis (TEA) of both treatments in order to assess the feasibility of scaling up. The TEA was carried out using a discounted cash flow model and its data were collected from practical experiments conducted using a fluidised bed pyrolysis reactor and bubbling fluidised bed gasifier system with a capacity of 0.2 kg/h and 1 kg/h, respectively, then upscaling to one tonne/h. The technological evaluation was made based on the optimal conditions that could produce the maximum amount of pyrolysis oil (42.3%) and hydrogen-rich syngas (89.7%). These treatments were also compared to the incineration of WMs as a commercial solution. The discounted payback, simple payback, net present value (NPV), production cost, and internal rate of return (IRR) were the main indicators used in the economic feasibility analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed using SimLab software with the help of Monte Carlo simulations. The results showed that the production cost of the main variables was estimated at 45.4 EUR/t (gate fee), 71.7 EUR/MWh (electricity), 30.5 EUR/MWh (heat), 356 EUR/t (oil), 221 EUR/t (gaseous), 237 EUR/t (char), and 257 EUR/t (syngas). Meanwhile, the IRR results showed that gasification (12.51%) and incineration (7.56%) have better economic performance, while pyrolysis can produce less revenue (1.73%). Based on the TEA results, it is highly recommended to use the gasification process to treat WMs, yielding higher revenue.

Suggested Citation

  • Samy Yousef & Vidas Lekavičius & Nerijus Striūgas, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Masks Generated in the EU during COVID-19 Pandemic into Energy Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3948-:d:1141654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3948/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3948/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sulaiman Al Yahya & Tahir Iqbal & Muhammad Mubashar Omar & Munir Ahmad, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Fast Pyrolysis of Date Palm Waste for Adoption in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Li, Jinhu & Ye, Xinhao & Burra, Kiran G. & Lu, Wei & Wang, Zhiwei & Liu, Xuan & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2023. "Synergistic effects during co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of polypropylene and polystyrene," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Mahmood, Russell & Parshetti, Ganesh K. & Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar, 2016. "Energy, exergy and techno-economic analyses of hydrothermal oxidation of food waste to produce hydro-char and bio-oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 187-198.
    4. Gul, Eid & Riva, Lorenzo & Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed & Yang, Haiping & Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Qing & Skreiberg, Øyvind & Wang, Liang & Barbanera, Marco & Zampilli, Mauro & Bartocci, Pietro & Fantozzi, Franc, 2021. "Substitution of coke with pelletized biocarbon in the European and Chinese steel industries: An LCA analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    5. Lekavičius, Vidas & Galinis, Arvydas & Miškinis, Vaclovas, 2019. "Long-term economic impacts of energy development scenarios: The role of domestic electricity generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Sharma, Prateek & Sheth, Pratik N. & Mohapatra, B.N., 2023. "Co-processing of petcoke and producer gas obtained from RDF gasification in a white cement plant: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Sheng & Liang, Jianeng & Yang, Siyu & Qian, Yu, 2016. "A novel cascade refrigeration process using waste heat and its application to coal-to-SNG," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 486-497.
    2. Ali Mohammadi & G. Venkatesh & Maria Sandberg & Samieh Eskandari & Stephen Joseph & Karin Granström, 2020. "A Comprehensive Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of the Use of Hydrochar Pellets in Combined Heat and Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Kohl, Thomas & Järvinen, Mika, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of the by-products contribution from non-catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulose residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 679-695.
    4. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Salvatore Digiesi & Giovanni Mummolo & Micaela Vitti, 2022. "Minimum Emissions Configuration of a Green Energy–Steel System: An Analytical Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Shi, Yong & Ren, Xinyue & Guo, Kun & Zhou, Yi & Wang, Jun, 2020. "Research on the economic development pattern of Chinese counties based on electricity consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Essossinam Beguedou & Satyanarayana Narra & Komi Agboka & Damgou Mani Kongnine & Ekua Afrakoma Armoo, 2023. "Alternative Fuel Substitution Improvements in Low NO x In-Line Calciners," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-31, June.
    8. Mohamed, Badr A. & O'Boyle, Marnie & Li, Loretta Y., 2023. "Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for sustainable liquid and gaseous fuel production: A life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    9. Theppitak, Sarut & Hungwe, Douglas & Ding, Lu & Xin, Dai & Yu, Guangsuo & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2020. "Comparison on solid biofuel production from wet and dry carbonization processes of food wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Alessandro Cardarelli & Marco Barbanera, 2023. "Substitution of Fossil Coal with Hydrochar from Agricultural Waste in the Electric Arc Furnace Steel Industry: A Comprehensive Life Cycle Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Le Treut, Gaëlle & Lefèvre, Julien & Lallana, Francisco & Bravo, Gonzalo, 2021. "The multi-level economic impacts of deep decarbonization strategies for the energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Ayub, Yousaf & Zhou, Jianzhao & Shen, Weifeng & Ren, Jingzheng, 2023. "Innovative valorization of biomass waste through integration of pyrolysis and gasification: Process design, optimization, and multi-scenario sustainability analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    13. Singh, Gurjeet & Singh, P.J. & Tyagi, V.V. & Barnwal, P. & Pandey, A.K., 2019. "Exergy and thermo-economic analysis of ghee production plant in dairy industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 602-618.
    14. Marcin Sajdak & Roksana Muzyka & Grzegorz Gałko & Ewelina Ksepko & Monika Zajemska & Szymon Sobek & Dariusz Tercki, 2022. "Actual Trends in the Usability of Biochar as a High-Value Product of Biomass Obtained through Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Isaac Lorero & Arturo J. Vizcaíno & Francisco J. Alguacil & Félix A. López, 2020. "Activated Carbon from Winemaking Waste: Thermoeconomic Analysis for Large-Scale Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Haili Liu & Xu Zhang & Qingchao Hong, 2021. "Emission Characteristics of Pollution Gases from the Combustion of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, October.
    17. Yan, Mi & Liu, Yu & Song, Yucai & Xu, Aiming & Zhu, Gaojun & Jiang, Jiahao & Hantoko, Dwi, 2022. "Comprehensive experimental study on energy conversion of household kitchen waste via integrated hydrothermal carbonization and supercritical water gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Jaime E. Borbolla-Gaxiola & Andrew B. Ross & Valerie Dupont, 2022. "Multi-Variate and Multi-Response Analysis of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Food Waste: Hydrochar Composition and Solid Fuel Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Karbasioun, Matin & Gholamalipour, Afshin & Safaie, Nasser & Shirazizadeh, Rasool & Amidpour, Majid, 2023. "Developing sustainable power systems by evaluating techno-economic, environmental, and social indicators from a system dynamics approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Muhammad Sultan & Muhammad Hamid Mahmood & Md Shamim Ahamed & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Muhammad Wakil Shahzad, 2022. "Energy Systems and Applications in Agriculture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-3, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3948-:d:1141654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.