IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v102y2016icp187-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, exergy and techno-economic analyses of hydrothermal oxidation of food waste to produce hydro-char and bio-oil

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmood, Russell
  • Parshetti, Ganesh K.
  • Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar

Abstract

In this study, energy, exergy and techno-economic analyses of HOT (hydrothermal oxidation) of food waste to solid (hydrochar) and liquid (bio-oil) fuels were performed. The HOT process was carried with and without enzymatic pre-treatment for fuel production. A conceptual chemical mass balance model was developed. Increasing the process temperature increased the yield of bio-oil and enhanced the quality of the hydro-char. Inclusion of the enzymatic pre-treatment reduced bio-oil yield but enhanced hydro-char quality. Energy balance and exergy analyses indicated that the HOT process is feasible at different operating temperatures. However, the energy conversion efficiencies of the process decreased with increasing temperatures. TEA (Techno-economic analysis) was performed to assess economic feasibility. The “minimum selling price” of products was calculated and compared with the existing market prices. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was carried out, which showed that the price of bio-oil and enzymes had the highest impact on the profitability of the plant in the case of the enzymatic pre-treated process while the bio-oil yield had the highest impact for the non-enzymatic process. Monte-Carlo simulation was carried out to examine the robustness of TEA analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmood, Russell & Parshetti, Ganesh K. & Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar, 2016. "Energy, exergy and techno-economic analyses of hydrothermal oxidation of food waste to produce hydro-char and bio-oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 187-198.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:102:y:2016:i:c:p:187-198
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216300858
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2014. "Types of costs and their measurement," Chapters, in: Cost–Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations, Second Edition, chapter 3, pages 61-87, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Prins, Mark J. & Pierik, Anke, 2007. "Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 568-574.
    3. ., 2014. "Deterrence measures," Chapters, in: Confronting the Shadow Economy, chapter 6, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Mohammad I. Jahirul & Mohammad G. Rasul & Ashfaque Ahmed Chowdhury & Nanjappa Ashwath, 2012. "Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis —A Technological Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-50, November.
    5. ., 2014. "Measuring utilities in cost–utility analysis," Chapters, in: Cost–Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations, Second Edition, chapter 9, pages 247-280, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. ., 2014. "Number, weight and measure," Chapters, in: Trade in Health, chapter 2, pages 6-29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Zhu, Yunhua & Biddy, Mary J. & Jones, Susanne B. & Elliott, Douglas C. & Schmidt, Andrew J., 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of liquid fuel production from woody biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 384-394.
    8. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2007. "From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1248-1259.
    9. Prawisudha, Pandji & Namioka, Tomoaki & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2012. "Coal alternative fuel production from municipal solid wastes employing hydrothermal treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 298-304.
    10. Tekin, Kubilay & Karagöz, Selhan & Bektaş, Sema, 2014. "A review of hydrothermal biomass processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 673-687.
    11. ., 2014. "A typology of policy measures," Chapters, in: Confronting the Shadow Economy, chapter 5, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Hepbasli, Arif, 2008. "A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 593-661, April.
    13. ., 2014. "Commitment measures," Chapters, in: Confronting the Shadow Economy, chapter 10, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Sheng & Liang, Jianeng & Yang, Siyu & Qian, Yu, 2016. "A novel cascade refrigeration process using waste heat and its application to coal-to-SNG," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 486-497.
    2. Ali Mohammadi & G. Venkatesh & Maria Sandberg & Samieh Eskandari & Stephen Joseph & Karin Granström, 2020. "A Comprehensive Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of the Use of Hydrochar Pellets in Combined Heat and Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Moreno-Sader, K. & Meramo-Hurtado, S.I. & González-Delgado, A.D., 2019. "Computer-aided environmental and exergy analysis as decision-making tools for selecting bio-oil feedstocks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 42-57.
    4. Theppitak, Sarut & Hungwe, Douglas & Ding, Lu & Xin, Dai & Yu, Guangsuo & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2020. "Comparison on solid biofuel production from wet and dry carbonization processes of food wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Isaac Lorero & Arturo J. Vizcaíno & Francisco J. Alguacil & Félix A. López, 2020. "Activated Carbon from Winemaking Waste: Thermoeconomic Analysis for Large-Scale Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Nicholas Davison & Jaime Borbolla Gaxiola & Divya Gupta & Anurag Garg & Timothy Cockerill & Yuzhou Tang & Xueliang Yuan & Andrew Ross, 2022. "Potential Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for Converting High Moisture Food Waste into Bio-Coal from Hydrothermal Carbonisation in India, Europe and China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-37, February.
    7. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Kohl, Thomas & Järvinen, Mika, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of the by-products contribution from non-catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulose residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 679-695.
    8. Cao, Yang & He, Mingjing & Dutta, Shanta & Luo, Gang & Zhang, Shicheng & Tsang, Daniel C.W., 2021. "Hydrothermal carbonization and liquefaction for sustainable production of hydrochar and aromatics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Haili Liu & Xu Zhang & Qingchao Hong, 2021. "Emission Characteristics of Pollution Gases from the Combustion of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, October.
    11. Zhang, Hongsheng & Zhao, Hongbin & Li, Zhenlin, 2016. "Thermodynamic performance study on solar-assisted absorption heat pump cogeneration system in the coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 942-955.
    12. Yan, Mi & Liu, Yu & Song, Yucai & Xu, Aiming & Zhu, Gaojun & Jiang, Jiahao & Hantoko, Dwi, 2022. "Comprehensive experimental study on energy conversion of household kitchen waste via integrated hydrothermal carbonization and supercritical water gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Azzaz, Ahmed Amine & Khiari, Besma & Jellali, Salah & Ghimbeu, Camélia Matei & Jeguirim, Mejdi, 2020. "Hydrochars production, characterization and application for wastewater treatment: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    14. Akbar Saba & Kyle McGaughy & M. Toufiq Reza, 2019. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of a Coal-Miscanthus Blend," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Jaime E. Borbolla-Gaxiola & Andrew B. Ross & Valerie Dupont, 2022. "Multi-Variate and Multi-Response Analysis of Hydrothermal Carbonization of Food Waste: Hydrochar Composition and Solid Fuel Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Singh, Gurjeet & Singh, P.J. & Tyagi, V.V. & Barnwal, P. & Pandey, A.K., 2019. "Exergy and thermo-economic analysis of ghee production plant in dairy industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 602-618.
    17. Samy Yousef & Vidas Lekavičius & Nerijus Striūgas, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Masks Generated in the EU during COVID-19 Pandemic into Energy Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Mariana Ferdeș & Bianca Ștefania Zăbavă & Gigel Paraschiv & Mariana Ionescu & Mirela Nicoleta Dincă & Georgiana Moiceanu, 2022. "Food Waste Management for Biogas Production in the Context of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edith Kitzmantel, 2016. "EU-Fiskalregeln - Anker oder Mühlstein der europäischen Wirtschaftspolitik?," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 42(3), pages 431-450.
    2. Hilbert, Martin, 2016. "The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 567-581.
    3. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2016v:42i:03p:431 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    5. Hrnčič, Maša Knez & Kravanja, Gregor & Knez, Željko, 2016. "Hydrothermal treatment of biomass for energy and chemicals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1312-1322.
    6. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    7. Nie, Yuhao & Bi, Xiaotao T., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of transportation biofuels from hydrothermal liquefaction of forest residues in British Columbia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 464-475.
    8. He, Chang & Feng, Xiao & Chu, Khim Hoong, 2013. "Process modeling and thermodynamic analysis of Lurgi fixed-bed coal gasifier in an SNG plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 742-757.
    9. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    10. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    11. Karamarkovic, Rade & Karamarkovic, Vladan, 2010. "Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 537-549.
    12. Rovas, Dimitrios & Zabaniotou, Anastasia, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a small gasification-ICE integrated system for CHP production fueled with Mediterranean agro-food processing wastes: The SMARt-CHP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 510-517.
    13. Déniel, Maxime & Haarlemmer, Geert & Roubaud, Anne & Weiss-Hortala, Elsa & Fages, Jacques, 2016. "Energy valorisation of food processing residues and model compounds by hydrothermal liquefaction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1632-1652.
    14. He, Chao & Tang, Chunyan & Li, Chuanhao & Yuan, Jihui & Tran, Khanh-Quang & Bach, Quang-Vu & Qiu, Rongliang & Yang, Yanhui, 2018. "Wet torrefaction of biomass for high quality solid fuel production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 259-271.
    15. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Wang, Sheng & Bi, Xiaotao & Wang, Shudong, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification for biomethane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1207-1218.
    17. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    18. Gao, Ying & Yu, Bo & Wang, Xianhua & Yuan, Qiaoxia & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Hanping & Zhang, Shihong, 2015. "Orthogonal test design to optimize products and to characterize heavy oil via biomass hydrothermal treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 139-148.
    19. Ojeda, Karina & Sánchez, Eduardo & Kafarov, Viatcheslav, 2011. "Sustainable ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass – Application of exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2119-2128.
    20. Wang, Linwei & Izaharuddin, Ainul N. & Karimi, Nader & Paul, Manosh C., 2021. "A numerical investigation of CO2 gasification of biomass particles- analysis of energy, exergy and entropy generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    21. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:102:y:2016:i:c:p:187-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.