IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v272y2020ics0306261920307765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison on solid biofuel production from wet and dry carbonization processes of food wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Theppitak, Sarut
  • Hungwe, Douglas
  • Ding, Lu
  • Xin, Dai
  • Yu, Guangsuo
  • Yoshikawa, Kunio

Abstract

In this research, three categories of food waste (dried cabbage, chicken, and rice) were separately subjected to hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) under 180 °C, 200 °C, and 220 °C and pyrolytic carbonization (PC) under 200 °C, 250 °C, 300 °C, 350 °C, and 400 °C for solid biofuel production, respectively. Carbonization pathways, solid yield, high heating value (HHV), the transformation of nitrogen and ash, and char reactivity were detailly compared. After both pre-treatments, the ratio of fixed carbon (FC) to volatile matter (VM) of solid increased with the increase of the temperature, except for HTC of chicken. HTC of chicken led to more VM in solid product with very low solid yield and significantly lower N content. HTC-chars showed higher VM even at the same temperature as PC despite more severe carbonization (higher C content). Even though the N content can be reduced by both HTC and PC, HTC showed superiority than PC in regards to reducing the N content, indicating the potential to mitigate the N-related emission. Even though the HHV of HTC char was higher than that of PC char at the same pretreatment temperature, the product yield of the former one was much lower, resulting in lower energy yield in HTC char. The alkaline index (AI) can be used as the main factor for comparisons of gasification reactivity between (1) HTC and PC-chars and (2) Among HTC-chars from different temperatures. PC-chars presented higher reactivity than HTC-chars for all types of feedstock when considering at the same pre-treatment temperature at 200 °C. In conclusion, the key parameters including VM, the solid yield, HHV, the N content reduction, and char reactivity can be adopted to well evaluate the solid biofuel qualities production from different processes of HTC and PC, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Theppitak, Sarut & Hungwe, Douglas & Ding, Lu & Xin, Dai & Yu, Guangsuo & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2020. "Comparison on solid biofuel production from wet and dry carbonization processes of food wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:272:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920307765
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920307765
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mendiara, T. & García-Labiano, F. & Abad, A. & Gayán, P. & de Diego, L.F. & Izquierdo, M.T. & Adánez, J., 2018. "Negative CO2 emissions through the use of biofuels in chemical looping technology: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 657-684.
    2. Kan, Tao & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2016. "Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1126-1140.
    3. Mahmood, Russell & Parshetti, Ganesh K. & Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar, 2016. "Energy, exergy and techno-economic analyses of hydrothermal oxidation of food waste to produce hydro-char and bio-oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 187-198.
    4. Lu, Ding & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Ismail, Tamer M. & Abd El-Salam, M., 2018. "Assessment of the carbonized woody briquette gasification in an updraft fixed bed gasifier using the Euler-Euler model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 70-86.
    5. He, Chao & Giannis, Apostolos & Wang, Jing-Yuan, 2013. "Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: Hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 257-266.
    6. Zhao, Peitao & Chen, Hongfang & Ge, Shifu & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2013. "Effect of the hydrothermal pretreatment for the reduction of NO emission from sewage sludge combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 199-205.
    7. Ding, Lu & Gong, Yan & Wang, Yifei & Wang, Fuchen & Yu, Guangsuo, 2017. "Characterisation of the morphological changes and interactions in char, slag and ash during CO2 gasification of rice straw and lignite," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 713-724.
    8. Ripa, M. & Fiorentino, G. & Giani, H. & Clausen, A. & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "Refuse recovered biomass fuel from municipal solid waste. A life cycle assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P2), pages 211-225.
    9. Ahmed, I.I. & Gupta, A.K., 2010. "Pyrolysis and gasification of food waste: Syngas characteristics and char gasification kinetics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 101-108, January.
    10. Wei, Juntao & Guo, Qinghua & Ding, Lu & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Yu, Guangsuo, 2017. "Synergy mechanism analysis of petroleum coke and municipal solid waste (MSW)-derived hydrochar co-gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1354-1363.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. González-Arias, J. & Gómez, X. & González-Castaño, M. & Sánchez, M.E. & Rosas, J.G. & Cara-Jiménez, J., 2022. "Insights into the product quality and energy requirements for solid biofuel production: A comparison of hydrothermal carbonization, pyrolysis and torrefaction of olive tree pruning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Yang & Lei, Zhongfang & Yang, Xi & Yang, Xiaojing & Huang, Weiwei & Shimizu, Kazuya & Zhang, Zhenya, 2018. "Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobic granular sludge: Effect of process temperature on nutrients availability and energy gain from produced hydrochar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 88-95.
    2. Wang, Liping & Chang, Yuzhi & Li, Aimin, 2019. "Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 423-440.
    3. Alexander Gorshkov & Nikolay Berezikov & Albert Kaltaev & Stanislav Yankovsky & Konstantin Slyusarsky & Roman Tabakaev & Kirill Larionov, 2021. "Analysis of the Physicochemical Characteristics of Biochar Obtained by Slow Pyrolysis of Nut Shells in a Nitrogen Atmosphere," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Mosqueda, Alexander & Wei, Juntao & Medrano, Katleya & Gonzales, Hazel & Ding, Lu & Yu, Guangsuo & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2019. "Co-gasification reactivity and synergy of banana residue hydrochar and anthracite coal blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 92-97.
    5. Zhuang, Xiuzheng & Liu, Jianguo & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Chenguang & Zhan, Hao & Ma, Longlong, 2022. "A review on the utilization of industrial biowaste via hydrothermal carbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Yan, Mi & Liu, Yu & Song, Yucai & Xu, Aiming & Zhu, Gaojun & Jiang, Jiahao & Hantoko, Dwi, 2022. "Comprehensive experimental study on energy conversion of household kitchen waste via integrated hydrothermal carbonization and supercritical water gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Wang, Tengfei & Zhai, Yunbo & Zhu, Yun & Li, Caiting & Zeng, Guangming, 2018. "A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 223-247.
    8. Azzaz, Ahmed Amine & Khiari, Besma & Jellali, Salah & Ghimbeu, Camélia Matei & Jeguirim, Mejdi, 2020. "Hydrochars production, characterization and application for wastewater treatment: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. He, Chao & Tang, Chunyan & Li, Chuanhao & Yuan, Jihui & Tran, Khanh-Quang & Bach, Quang-Vu & Qiu, Rongliang & Yang, Yanhui, 2018. "Wet torrefaction of biomass for high quality solid fuel production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 259-271.
    10. Yu, Xin & Yu, Dunxi & Liu, Fangqi & Han, Jingkun & Wu, Jianqun & Xu, Minghou, 2022. "Synergistic effects, gas evolution and ash interaction during isothermal steam co-gasification of biomass with high-sulfur petroleum coke," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    11. Bach, Quang-Vu & Skreiberg, Øyvind, 2016. "Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 665-677.
    12. Zhao, Peitao & Shen, Yafei & Ge, Shifu & Chen, Zhenqian & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2014. "Clean solid biofuel production from high moisture content waste biomass employing hydrothermal treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 345-367.
    13. Arabiourrutia, Miriam & Lopez, Gartzen & Artetxe, Maite & Alvarez, Jon & Bilbao, Javier & Olazar, Martin, 2020. "Waste tyre valorization by catalytic pyrolysis – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    14. Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Farooq, Abid & Gan, Yong Yang & Lee, Keat Teong & Ashokkumar, Veeramuthu, 2019. "Catalytic thermochemical conversion of biomass for biofuel production: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Porcu, Andrea & Xu, Yupeng & Mureddu, Mauro & Dessì, Federica & Shahnam, Mehrdad & Rogers, William A. & Sastri, Bhima S. & Pettinau, Alberto, 2021. "Experimental validation of a multiphase flow model of a lab-scale fluidized-bed gasification unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    16. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    17. Xia Liu & Juntao Wei & Wei Huo & Guangsuo Yu, 2017. "Gasification under CO 2 –Steam Mixture: Kinetic Model Study Based on Shared Active Sites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    18. Lee, Seokhwan & Woo, Sang Hee & Kim, Yongrae & Choi, Young & Kang, Kernyong, 2020. "Combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel-powered generator running with N-butanol/coffee ground pyrolysis oil/diesel blended fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    19. Schulzke, T. & Westermeyer, J. & Giani, H. & Hornsby, C., 2018. "Combustion of Refined Renewable Biomass Fuel (RRBF) in a bubbling fluidized bed," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 84-94.
    20. Xiao, Zhihua & Yuan, Xingzhong & Jiang, Longbo & Chen, Xiaohong & Li, Hui & Zeng, Guangming & Leng, Lijian & Wang, Hou & Huang, Huajun, 2015. "Energy recovery and secondary pollutant emission from the combustion of co-pelletized fuel from municipal sewage sludge and wood sawdust," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 441-450.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:272:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920307765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.