IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p1700-d1061998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Robust Model for Portfolio Management of Microgrid Operator in the Balancing Market

Author

Listed:
  • Meysam Khojasteh

    (GECAD—Research Group on Intelligent Engineering and Computing for Advanced Innovation and Development, LASI—Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Pedro Faria

    (GECAD—Research Group on Intelligent Engineering and Computing for Advanced Innovation and Development, LASI—Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Fernando Lezama

    (GECAD—Research Group on Intelligent Engineering and Computing for Advanced Innovation and Development, LASI—Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Zita Vale

    (GECAD—Research Group on Intelligent Engineering and Computing for Advanced Innovation and Development, LASI—Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The stochastic nature of renewable energy resources and consumption has the potential to threaten the balance between generation and consumption as well as to cause instability in power systems. The microgrid operators (MGOs) are financially responsible for compensating for the imbalance of power within their portfolio. The imbalance of power can be supplied by rescheduling flexible resources or participating in the balancing market. This paper presents a robust optimization (RO)-based model to maintain the balance of a portfolio according to uncertainties in renewable power generation and consumption. Furthermore, load reduction (LR) and battery energy storage (BES) are considered flexible resources of the MGO on the consumption side. The model is formulated based on the minimax decision rule that determines the minimum cost of balancing based on the worst-case realizations of uncertain parameters. Through the strong duality theory and big-M theory, the proposed minimax model is transformed into a single-level linear maximization problem. The proposed model is tested on a six-node microgrid test system. The main contributions of the proposed model are presenting a robust model for portfolio management of MGO and using BES and LR to improve the flexibility of microgrid. Simulation results demonstrate that using LR and BES could decrease the balancing cost. However, the optimal portfolio management to compensate for the imbalance of power is highly dependent on the risk preferences of MGO.

Suggested Citation

  • Meysam Khojasteh & Pedro Faria & Fernando Lezama & Zita Vale, 2023. "A Robust Model for Portfolio Management of Microgrid Operator in the Balancing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1700-:d:1061998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hakimi, Seyed Mehdi & Hasankhani, Arezoo & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2021. "Stochastic planning of a multi-microgrid considering integration of renewable energy resources and real-time electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Khojasteh, Meysam & Faria, Pedro & Vale, Zita, 2022. "A robust model for aggregated bidding of energy storages and wind resources in the joint energy and reserve markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    3. van der Veen, Reinier A.C. & Abbasy, Alireza & Hakvoort, Rudi A., 2012. "Agent-based analysis of the impact of the imbalance pricing mechanism on market behavior in electricity balancing markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 874-881.
    4. Scherer, Marc & Haubensak, Oliver & Staake, Thorsten, 2015. "Assessing distorted trading incentives of balance responsible parties based on the example of the Swiss power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 792-801.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khojasteh, Meysam & Faria, Pedro & Lezama, Fernando & Vale, Zita, 2023. "A hierarchy model to use local resources by DSO and TSO in the balancing market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Saeian, Hosein & Niknam, Taher & Zare, Mohsen & Aghaei, Jamshid, 2022. "Coordinated optimal bidding strategies methods of aggregated microgrids: A game theory-based demand side management under an electricity market environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Oprea, Simona-Vasilica & Bâra, Adela & Ciurea, Cristian-Eugen, 2022. "A novel cost-revenue allocation computation for the competitiveness of balancing responsible parties, including RES. Insights from the electricity market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 881-894.
    4. Eicke, Anselm & Ruhnau, Oliver & Hirth, Lion, 2021. "Electricity balancing as a market equilibrium," EconStor Preprints 233852, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    5. Jani, Ali & Karimi, Hamid & Jadid, Shahram, 2022. "Two-layer stochastic day-ahead and real-time energy management of networked microgrids considering integration of renewable energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    6. Jani, Ali & Jadid, Shahram, 2023. "Two-stage energy scheduling framework for multi-microgrid system in market environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    7. Okur, Özge & Voulis, Nina & Heijnen, Petra & Lukszo, Zofia, 2019. "Aggregator-mediated demand response: Minimizing imbalances caused by uncertainty of solar generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 426-437.
    8. Wu, Zhaoyuan & Zhou, Ming & Zhang, Ting & Li, Gengyin & Zhang, Yan & Liu, Xiaojuan, 2020. "Imbalance settlement evaluation for China's balancing market design via an agent-based model with a multiple criteria decision analysis method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Elkholy, M.H. & Metwally, Hamid & Farahat, M.A. & Senjyu, Tomonobu & Elsayed Lotfy, Mohammed, 2022. "Smart centralized energy management system for autonomous microgrid using FPGA," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    10. Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & van der Veen, Reinier A.C. & Hakvoort, Rudi A., 2014. "The interplay between imbalance pricing mechanisms and network congestions – Analysis of the German electricity market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 52-61.
    11. Brijs, Tom & De Jonghe, Cedric & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Belmans, Ronnie, 2017. "Interactions between the design of short-term electricity markets in the CWE region and power system flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 36-51.
    12. Sohani, Ali & Cornaro, Cristina & Shahverdian, Mohammad Hassan & Moser, David & Pierro, Marco & Olabi, Abdul Ghani & Karimi, Nader & Nižetić, Sandro & Li, Larry K.B. & Doranehgard, Mohammad Hossein, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation of a hybrid photovoltaic system with hot/cold water storage for poly-generation in a residential building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    13. Zhihan Shi & Guangming Zhang & Xiaoxiong Zhou & Weisong Han & Mingxiang Zhu & Zhiqing Bai & Xiaodong Lv, 2023. "Research on Integrated Energy Distributed Sharing in Distribution Network Considering AC Power Flow and Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Gro Klaeboe & Anders Lund Eriksrud & Stein-Erik Fleten, 2013. "Benchmarking time series based forecasting models for electricity balancing market prices," Working Papers 2013-006, The George Washington University, Department of Economics, H. O. Stekler Research Program on Forecasting.
    15. Brijs, Tom & De Vos, Kristof & De Jonghe, Cedric & Belmans, Ronnie, 2015. "Statistical analysis of negative prices in European balancing markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 53-60.
    16. del Río, Pablo & Kiefer, Christoph P., 2023. "Academic research on renewable electricity auctions: Taking stock and looking forward," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Weisi Deng & Buhan Zhang & Hongfa Ding & Hang Li, 2017. "Risk-Based Probabilistic Voltage Stability Assessment in Uncertain Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Glismann, Samuel, 2021. "Ancillary Services Acquisition Model: Considering market interactions in policy design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    19. Chang, Weiguang & Dong, Wei & Yang, Qiang, 2023. "Day-ahead bidding strategy of cloud energy storage serving multiple heterogeneous microgrids in the electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    20. Zhang, Xihai & Ge, Shaoyun & Liu, Hong & Zhou, Yue & He, Xingtang & Xu, Zhengyang, 2023. "Distributionally robust optimization for peer-to-peer energy trading considering data-driven ambiguity sets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1700-:d:1061998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.