IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7543-d1278660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility Theory-Based Information Gap Decision Theory to Improve Robustness of Electricity Trading under Uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Zhao

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Peng Wang

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Qiushuang Li

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Yan Li

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Zhifan Liu

    (Economic & Technology Research Institute, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Liang Feng

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Jiajia Chen

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

Abstract

In the backdrop of the ongoing reforms within the electricity market and the escalating integration of renewable energy sources, power service providers encounter substantial trading risks stemming from the inherent uncertainties surrounding market prices and load demands. This paper endeavors to address these challenges by proposing a credibility theory-based information gap decision theory (CTbIGDT) to improve robustness of electricity trading under uncertainties. To begin, we establish credibility theory as a foundational risk assessment methodology for uncertain price and load, incorporating both necessity and randomness measures. Subsequently, we advance the concept by developing the CTbIGDT optimization model, grounded in the consideration of expected costs, with the primary aim of fortifying the robustness of electricity trading practices. The ensuing model is then transformed into an equivalent form and solved using established standard optimization techniques. To validate the efficacy and robustness of our proposed methodology, a case study is conducted utilizing a modified IEEE 33-node distribution network system. The results of this study serve to underscore the viability and potency of the CTbIGDT model in enhancing the effectiveness of electricity trading strategies in an uncertain environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Zhao & Peng Wang & Qiushuang Li & Yan Li & Zhifan Liu & Liang Feng & Jiajia Chen, 2023. "Credibility Theory-Based Information Gap Decision Theory to Improve Robustness of Electricity Trading under Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7543-:d:1278660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7543/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7543/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majidi, M. & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. & Soroudi, A., 2019. "Application of information gap decision theory in practical energy problems: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 157-165.
    2. Rai, Alan & Nunn, Oliver, 2020. "On the impact of increasing penetration of variable renewables on electricity spot price extremes in Australia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 67-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mwampashi, Muthe Mathias & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Konstandatos, Otto & Rai, Alan, 2021. "Wind generation and the dynamics of electricity prices in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Abbas Rabiee & Ali Abdali & Seyed Masoud Mohseni-Bonab & Mohsen Hazrati, 2021. "Risk-Averse Scheduling of Combined Heat and Power-Based Microgrids in Presence of Uncertain Distributed Energy Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Utama, Christian & Troitzsch, Sebastian & Thakur, Jagruti, 2021. "Demand-side flexibility and demand-side bidding for flexible loads in air-conditioned buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Mwampashi, Muthe Mathias & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Rai, Alan & Konstandatos, Otto, 2022. "Large-scale and rooftop solar generation in the NEM: A tale of two renewables strategies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Yasir Alsaedi & Gurudeo Anand Tularam & Victor Wong, 2021. "Impact of the Nature of Energy Management and Responses to Policies Regarding Solar and Wind Pricing: A Qualitative Study of the Australian Electricity Markets," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 191-205.
    6. Rangarajan, Arvind & Foley, Sean & Trück, Stefan, 2023. "Assessing the impact of battery storage on Australian electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Savis Gohari Krangsås & Koen Steemers & Thaleia Konstantinou & Silvia Soutullo & Mingming Liu & Emanuela Giancola & Bahri Prebreza & Touraj Ashrafian & Lina Murauskaitė & Nienke Maas, 2021. "Positive Energy Districts: Identifying Challenges and Interdependencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Macedo, Daniela Pereira & Marques, António Cardoso & Damette, Olivier, 2021. "The Merit-Order Effect on the Swedish bidding zone with the highest electricity flow in the Elspot market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Ghasem Ansari & Reza Keypour, 2023. "Optimizing the Performance of Commercial Demand Response Aggregator Using the Risk-Averse Function of Information-Gap Decision Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, April.
    10. Moghadam, Mehdi Akbari & Bagheri, Sajad & Salemi, Amir Hosein & Tavakoli, Mohammad Bagher, 2023. "Long-term maintenance planning of medium voltage overhead lines considering the uncertainties and reasons for interruption in a real distribution network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Sepideh Rezaeeian & Narges Bayat & Abbas Rabiee & Saman Nikkhah & Alireza Soroudi, 2022. "Optimal Scheduling of Reconfigurable Microgrids in Both Grid-Connected and Isolated Modes Considering the Uncertainty of DERs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Atherton, John & Hofmeister, Markus & Mosbach, Sebastian & Akroyd, Jethro & Farazi, Feroz & Kraft, Markus, 2023. "British imbalance market paradox: Variable renewable energy penetration in energy markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Liu, Tingting & Xu, Jiuping, 2021. "Equilibrium strategy based policy shifts towards the integration of wind power in spot electricity markets: A perspective from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Javier L'opez Prol & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2020. "The Economics of Variable Renewables and Electricity Storage," Papers 2012.15371, arXiv.org.
    15. Guo, Xusheng & Lou, Suhua & Chen, Zhe & Wu, Yaowu, 2022. "Flexible operation of integrated energy system with HVDC infeed considering multi-retrofitted combined heat and power units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    16. Boroumandfar, Gholamreza & Khajehzadeh, Alimorad & Eslami, Mahdiyeh & Syah, Rahmad B.Y., 2023. "Information gap decision theory with risk aversion strategy for robust planning of hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery storage system in distribution networks considering uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    17. Qi Zhang & Shaohua Zhang & Xian Wang & Xue Li & Lei Wu, 2020. "Conditional-Robust-Profit-Based Optimization Model for Electricity Retailers with Shiftable Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Bonaldo, Cinzia & Caporin, Massimiliano & Fontini, Fulvio, 2022. "The relationship between day-ahead and future prices in electricity markets: An empirical analysis on Italy, France, Germany, and Switzerland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    19. Olukunle O. Owolabi & Toryn L. J. Schafer & Georgia E. Smits & Sanhita Sengupta & Sean E. Ryan & Lan Wang & David S. Matteson & Mila Getmansky Sherman & Deborah A. Sunter, 2021. "Role of Variable Renewable Energy Penetration on Electricity Price and its Volatility Across Independent System Operators in the United States," Papers 2112.11338, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    20. Peña, Juan Ignacio & Rodríguez, Rosa & Mayoral, Silvia, 2022. "Cannibalization, depredation, and market remuneration of power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7543-:d:1278660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.