IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i14p5343-d1192833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Effects of Smart Parking Infrastructure on the Electrical Power System

Author

Listed:
  • Dusan Medved

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Lubomir Bena

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Maksym Oliinyk

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Jaroslav Dzmura

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Damian Mazur

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Fundamentals, Rzeszow University of Technology, Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • David Martinko

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia)

Abstract

The forthcoming surge in electric vehicle (EV) adoption demands the comprehensive advancement of associated charging infrastructure. In this study, an exploration of EV charging’s impact on the power distribution system is conducted via the simulation of a parking lot equipped with six distinct types of EVs, each showcasing unique charging curves, charging power, and battery capacities. A charging profile is synthesized and compared with laboratory-obtained data to ascertain the implications on the grid. To further understand the effects of smart parking on the power distribution system, a mathematical algorithm was created and applied to a segment of an urban electrical grid that includes 70 private residences. Basic electrical parameters were computed using the node voltage method. Four scenarios were simulated: (1) the existing distribution system, (2) the current system plus smart parking, (3) the current system plus 50% of houses equipped with 3.5 kW photovoltaic installations, and (4) the current system plus photovoltaics and smart parking. This paper examines the core distribution system parameters, namely voltage and current, across these four scenarios, and the simulation results are extensively detailed herein.

Suggested Citation

  • Dusan Medved & Lubomir Bena & Maksym Oliinyk & Jaroslav Dzmura & Damian Mazur & David Martinko, 2023. "Assessing the Effects of Smart Parking Infrastructure on the Electrical Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5343-:d:1192833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/14/5343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Jing & Yan, Jie & Liu, Yongqian & Zhang, Haoran & Lv, Guoliang, 2020. "Daily electric vehicle charging load profiles considering demographics of vehicle users," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Patyal, Vishal Singh & Kumar, Ravi & Kushwah, Shiksha, 2021. "Modeling barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: An Indian perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Mohammadi Landi, Meysam & Mohammadi, Mohammad & Rastegar, Mohammad, 2018. "Simultaneous determination of optimal capacity and charging profile of plug-in electric vehicle parking lots in distribution systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 504-511.
    4. Nezamoddini, Nasim & Wang, Yong, 2016. "Risk management and participation planning of electric vehicles in smart grids for demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 836-850.
    5. Grzegorz Dec & Grzegorz Drałus & Damian Mazur & Bogdan Kwiatkowski, 2021. "Forecasting Models of Daily Energy Generation by PV Panels Using Fuzzy Logic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Diaz-Cachinero, Pablo & Muñoz-Hernandez, Jose Ignacio & Contreras, Javier, 2021. "Integrated operational planning model, considering optimal delivery routing, incentives and electric vehicle aggregated demand management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    7. Daziano, Ricardo A. & Chiew, Esther, 2012. "Electric vehicles rising from the dead: Data needs for forecasting consumer response toward sustainable energy sources in personal transportation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 876-894.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lingling Hu & Junming Zhou & Feng Jiang & Guangming Xie & Jie Hu & Qinglie Mo, 2023. "Research on Optimization of Valley-Filling Charging for Vehicle Network System Based on Multi-Objective Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azadeh Ahkamiraad & Yong Wang, 2018. "An Agent-Based Model for Zip-Code Level Diffusion of Electric Vehicles and Electricity Consumption in New York City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Einolander, Johannes & Lahdelma, Risto, 2022. "Explicit demand response potential in electric vehicle charging networks: Event-based simulation based on the multivariate copula procedure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Gnann, Till & Stephens, Thomas S. & Lin, Zhenhong & Plötz, Patrick & Liu, Changzheng & Brokate, Jens, 2018. "What drives the market for plug-in electric vehicles? - A review of international PEV market diffusion models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 158-164.
    4. Hakim Hammadou & Claire Papaix, 2015. "Policy packages for modal shift and CO2 reduction in Lille, France," Working Papers 1501, Chaire Economie du climat.
    5. Raja S, Charles & Kumar N M, Vijaya & J, Senthil kumar & Nesamalar J, Jeslin Drusila, 2021. "Enhancing system reliability by optimally integrating PHEV charging station and renewable distributed generators: A Bi-Level programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Rahman, Syed & Khan, Irfan Ahmed & Khan, Ashraf Ali & Mallik, Ayan & Nadeem, Muhammad Faisal, 2022. "Comprehensive review & impact analysis of integrating projected electric vehicle charging load to the existing low voltage distribution system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Li, Yanbin & Wang, Jiani & Wang, Weiye & Liu, Chang & Li, Yun, 2023. "Dynamic pricing based electric vehicle charging station location strategy using reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    8. Daina, Nicolò & Sivakumar, Aruna & Polak, John W., 2017. "Modelling electric vehicles use: a survey on the methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 447-460.
    9. Chakraborty, Rahul & Chakravarty, Sujoy, 2023. "Factors affecting acceptance of electric two-wheelers in India: A discrete choice survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 27-41.
    10. Lu, Shibao & Zhang, Xiaoling & Shang, Yizi & Li, Wei & Skitmore, Martin & Jiang, Shuli & Xue, Yangang, 2018. "Improving Hilbert–Huang transform for energy-correlation fluctuation in hydraulic engineering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1341-1350.
    11. Danielis, Romeo & Scorrano, Mariangela & Giansoldati, Marco & Rotaris, Lucia, 2019. "A meta-analysis of the importance of the driving range in consumers’ preference studies for battery electric vehicles," Working Papers 19_2, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    12. Morton, Craig & Anable, Jillian & Yeboah, Godwin & Cottrill, Caitlin, 2018. "The spatial pattern of demand in the early market for electric vehicles: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 119-130.
    13. Suryakiran, B.V. & Nizami, Sohrab & Verma, Ashu & Saha, Tapan Kumar & Mishra, Sukumar, 2023. "A DSO-based day-ahead market mechanism for optimal operational planning of active distribution network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Despoina Kothona & Aggelos S. Bouhouras, 2022. "A Two-Stage EV Charging Planning and Network Reconfiguration Methodology towards Power Loss Minimization in Low and Medium Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Ricardo A. Daziano & Martin Achtnicht, 2014. "Forecasting Adoption of Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicles Using Bayes Estimates of a Multinomial Probit Model and the GHK Simulator," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 671-683, November.
    17. Goldschmidt, Rüdiger & Richter, Andreas & Pfeil, Raphael, 2019. "Active stakeholder involvement and organisational tasks as factors for an effective communication and governance strategy in the promotion of e-taxis. Results from a field research lab," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Powell, Siobhan & Cezar, Gustavo Vianna & Rajagopal, Ram, 2022. "Scalable probabilistic estimates of electric vehicle charging given observed driver behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    19. George-Williams, H. & Wade, N. & Carpenter, R.N., 2022. "A probabilistic framework for the techno-economic assessment of smart energy hubs for electric vehicle charging," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    20. Gaofeng Gu & Tao Feng & Chixing Zhong & Xiaoxi Cai & Jiang Li, 2021. "The Effects of Life Course Events on Car Ownership and Sustainable Mobility Tools Adoption Decisions: Results of an Error Component Random Parameter Logit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:14:p:5343-:d:1192833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.