IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i10p4118-d1148040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Mineralization Using Industrial Waste as Feedstock to Produce Cement Substitutes

Author

Listed:
  • Finn-Erik Digulla

    (Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, Wilhelmshoeher Allee 47, 34117 Kassel, Germany)

  • Stefan Bringezu

    (Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, Wilhelmshoeher Allee 47, 34117 Kassel, Germany)

Abstract

The mineralization of carbon dioxide offers a way to permanently sequester carbon while producing construction materials, combining the concepts of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) and carbon capture and storage (CSS). However, it is important to evaluate different mineralization processes in terms of their environmental impact. This study provides the first comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis that focuses on the utilization of industrial waste materials. We analyzed the climate and material footprint of six mineralization pathways from cradle to gate using steel slag, concrete waste, municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash, and olivine as feedstock. A sensitivity analysis was used to identify the factors with the greatest impact on environmental performance. Our results show that all processes generate significantly negative values for the global warming impact (GWI) and raw material input (RMI), ranging from −0.6 to −1.3 k g CO 2 eq . kg feed − 1 and −0.6 to −1.6 k g kg feed − 1 , when cement substitute is considered as product. Five out of six processes produce negative values for these factors when sand is considered as a product. When operated as a CCS technology without product use, the processes result in GWI values ranging from −0.13 to 0.01 k g CO 2 eq . kg feed − 1 . Our study confirms that industrial mineralization is a promising technology for reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Future process development should focus on replacing carbon dioxide-intensive products while balancing energy and chemical demand with process efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Finn-Erik Digulla & Stefan Bringezu, 2023. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Mineralization Using Industrial Waste as Feedstock to Produce Cement Substitutes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4118-:d:1148040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wieland Hoppe & Nils Thonemann & Stefan Bringezu, 2018. "Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Dioxide–Based Production of Methane and Methanol and Derived Polymers," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(2), pages 327-340, April.
    2. Sanna, Aimaro & Dri, Marco & Hall, Matthew R. & Maroto-Valer, Mercedes, 2012. "Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) – A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 545-554.
    3. Said, Arshe & Laukkanen, Timo & Järvinen, Mika, 2016. "Pilot-scale experimental work on carbon dioxide sequestration using steelmaking slag," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 602-611.
    4. Clemens Mostert & Stefan Bringezu, 2019. "Measuring Product Material Footprint as New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method: Indicators and Abiotic Characterization Factors," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Bringezu, 2019. "Toward Science-Based and Knowledge-Based Targets for Global Sustainable Resource Use," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Zhang, Weifeng & Xu, Yuanlong & Wang, Qiuhua, 2022. "Coupled CO2 absorption and mineralization with low-concentration monoethanolamine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Nasvi, M.C.M. & Ranjith, P.G. & Sanjayan, J., 2014. "Effect of different mix compositions on apparent carbon dioxide (CO2) permeability of geopolymer: Suitability as well cement for CO2 sequestration wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 939-948.
    4. Muhammad Hameer Soomro & Faradiella Mohd Kusin & Ferdaus Mohamat-Yusuff & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud, 2024. "Elution of Divalent Cations from Iron Ore Mining Waste in an Indirect Aqueous Mineral Carbonation for Carbon Capture and Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Ren, Shan & Aldahri, Tahani & Liu, Weizao & Liang, Bin, 2021. "CO2 mineral sequestration by using blast furnace slag: From batch to continuous experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Zevenhoven, Ron & Legendre, Daniel & Said, Arshe & Järvinen, Mika, 2019. "Carbon dioxide dissolution and ammonia losses in bubble columns for precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1121-1129.
    7. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Dri, Marco & Sanna, Aimaro & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2014. "Mineral carbonation from metal wastes: Effect of solid to liquid ratio on the efficiency and characterization of carbonated products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 515-523.
    9. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    10. Li, Hongwei & Tang, Zhigang & Li, Na & Cui, Longpeng & Mao, Xian-zhong, 2020. "Mechanism and process study on steel slag enhancement for CO2 capture by seawater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    11. Chan-Ung Kang & Sang-Woo Ji & Hwanju Jo, 2022. "Recycling of Industrial Waste Gypsum Using Mineral Carbonation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Lee, Jaehee & Han, Sang-Jun & Wee, Jung-Ho, 2014. "Synthesis of dry sorbents for carbon dioxide capture using coal fly ash and its performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 40-47.
    13. Nadja von Gries & Stefan Bringezu, 2022. "Using New Spare Parts for Repair of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment? The Material Footprint of Individual Components," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Mejia, Cristian & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2020. "Emerging topics in energy storage based on a large-scale analysis of academic articles and patents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    15. Galvez-Martos, J.L. & Morrison, J. & Jauffret, G. & Elsarrag, E. & AlHorr, Y. & Imbabi, M.S. & Glasser, F.P., 2016. "Environmental assessment of aqueous alkaline absorption of carbon dioxide and its use to produce a construction material," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 129-141.
    16. Zhang, Baoxu & Chen, Yumin & Zhang, Bing & Peng, Ruifeng & Lu, Qiancheng & Yan, Weijie & Yu, Bo & Liu, Fang & Zhang, Junying, 2022. "Cyclic performance of coke oven gas - Steam reforming with assistance of steel slag derivates for high purity hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 592-603.
    17. Don Rukmal Liyanage & Kasun Hewage & Hirushie Karunathilake & Gyan Chhipi-Shrestha & Rehan Sadiq, 2021. "Carbon Capture Systems for Building-Level Heating Systems—A Socio-Economic and Environmental Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-30, September.
    18. Koj, Jan Christian & Wulf, Christina & Zapp, Petra, 2019. "Environmental impacts of power-to-X systems - A review of technological and methodological choices in Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 865-879.
    19. Guo, Yafei & Zhao, Chuanwen & Chen, Xiaoping & Li, Changhai, 2015. "CO2 capture and sorbent regeneration performances of some wood ash materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 26-36.
    20. Singh, Udayan & Colosi, Lisa M., 2021. "The case for estimating carbon return on investment (CROI) for CCUS platforms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4118-:d:1148040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.