IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i23p8982-d986294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power Plant Cycles: Evolution towards More Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Meana-Fernández

    (Department of Energy, Escuela Politécnica de Ingeniería de Gijón, Edificio Departamental Este, University of Oviedo, C/Wifredo Ricart, s/n, 33204 Gijón, Spain)

  • Juan M. González-Caballín

    (Department of Energy, Escuela Politécnica de Ingeniería de Gijón, Edificio Departamental Este, University of Oviedo, C/Wifredo Ricart, s/n, 33204 Gijón, Spain)

  • Roberto Martínez-Pérez

    (Department of Energy, Escuela Politécnica de Ingeniería de Gijón, Edificio Departamental Este, University of Oviedo, C/Wifredo Ricart, s/n, 33204 Gijón, Spain)

  • Francisco J. Rubio-Serrano

    (IMASA, Ingeniería y Proyectos, S.A. Carpinteros 12, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain)

  • Antonio J. Gutiérrez-Trashorras

    (Department of Energy, Escuela Politécnica de Ingeniería de Gijón, Edificio Departamental Este, University of Oviedo, C/Wifredo Ricart, s/n, 33204 Gijón, Spain)

Abstract

The scarcity of energy and water resources and rising temperatures due to climate change has set the focus on improving the energy efficiency of power plant thermodynamic cycles to adapt to higher heat sink temperatures and use fewer resources for energy production. In this work, a review of power production thermodynamic cycles is presented: from Brayton to Rankine and combined cycles, alongside particular cycles such as Organic Rankine Cycles, Kalina, Goswami or the more recently developed Hygroscopic Cycle. The efficiency of these cycles and their possible improvements are considered, as well as their environmental impact. Costs associated with existing power plants found in the literature have also been included in the study. The main existing facilities for each cycle type are assessed, and the most sustainable options in terms of resource consumption (fuel, water, etc.) and future perspectives to ensure both their energy efficiency and sustainability are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Meana-Fernández & Juan M. González-Caballín & Roberto Martínez-Pérez & Francisco J. Rubio-Serrano & Antonio J. Gutiérrez-Trashorras, 2022. "Power Plant Cycles: Evolution towards More Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8982-:d:986294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8982/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8982/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Alessandra Ancona & Michele Bianchi & Lisa Branchini & Andrea De Pascale & Francesco Melino & Antonio Peretto & Noemi Torricelli, 2021. "Systematic Comparison of ORC and s-CO 2 Combined Heat and Power Plants for Energy Harvesting in Industrial Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Miguel Ángel Reyes-Belmonte, 2020. "A Bibliometric Study on Integrated Solar Combined Cycles (ISCC), Trends and Future Based on Data Analytics Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, October.
    3. Rahmoune, Mohamed Ben & Hafaifa, Ahmed & Kouzou, Abdellah & Chen, XiaoQi & Chaibet, Ahmed, 2021. "Gas turbine monitoring using neural network dynamic nonlinear autoregressive with external exogenous input modelling," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 23-47.
    4. Kazuaki Yazawa & Ali Shakouri, 2021. "Heat Flux Based Optimization of Combined Heat and Power Thermoelectric Heat Exchanger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Feretic, Danilo & Tomsic, Zeljko, 2005. "Probabilistic analysis of electrical energy costs comparing: production costs for gas, coal and nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 5-13, January.
    6. Lorenzo Tocci & Tamas Pal & Ioannis Pesmazoglou & Benjamin Franchetti, 2017. "Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Pereira, João S. & Ribeiro, José B. & Mendes, Ricardo & Vaz, Gilberto C. & André, Jorge C., 2018. "ORC based micro-cogeneration systems for residential application – A state of the art review and current challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 728-743.
    8. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Niederdränk, Anne & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of an ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating for geothermal applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    9. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Crespi, Francesco & Sánchez, David & Rodríguez, José M. & Gavagnin, Giacomo, 2020. "A thermo-economic methodology to select sCO2 power cycles for CSP applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2905-2912.
    11. Sadrameli, S.M., 2016. "Mathematical models for the simulation of thermal regenerators: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 462-476.
    12. Zaversky, Fritz & Les, Iñigo & Sorbet, Patxi & Sánchez, Marcelino & Valentin, Benoît & Brau, Jean-Florian & Siros, Frédéric, 2020. "The challenge of solar powered combined cycles – Providing dispatchability and increasing efficiency by integrating the open volumetric air receiver technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    13. Paul Njock, Julbin & Thierry Sosso, Olivier & Stouffs, Pascal & Nzengwa, Robert, 2022. "A comparative energy analysis of idealized cycles using an ammonia-water mixture for combined power/cooling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    14. Manuele Gatti & Emanuele Martelli & Daniele Di Bona & Marco Gabba & Roberto Scaccabarozzi & Maurizio Spinelli & Federico Viganò & Stefano Consonni, 2020. "Preliminary Performance and Cost Evaluation of Four Alternative Technologies for Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture in Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    15. Omar Mohamed & Ashraf Khalil, 2020. "Progress in Modeling and Control of Gas Turbine Power Generation Systems: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Du, Yadong & Hu, Chenxing & Yang, Ce & Wang, Haimei & Dong, Wuqiang, 2022. "Size optimization of heat exchanger and thermoeconomic assessment for supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle applied in marine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    17. Wang, Yanhong & Cao, Lihua & Hu, Pengfei & Li, Bo & Li, Yong, 2019. "Model establishment and performance evaluation of a modified regenerative system for a 660 MW supercritical unit running at the IPT-setting mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 890-915.
    18. Wu, Xiao & Wang, Meihong & Shen, Jiong & Li, Yiguo & Lawal, Adekola & Lee, Kwang Y., 2019. "Reinforced coordinated control of coal-fired power plant retrofitted with solvent based CO2 capture using model predictive controls," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 495-515.
    19. Zhu, Sipeng & Ma, Zetai & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "Energy and exergy analysis of the combined cycle power plant recovering waste heat from the marine two-stroke engine under design and off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Rodríguez-deArriba, Pablo & Crespi, Francesco & Sánchez, David & Muñoz, Antonio & Sánchez, Tomás, 2022. "The potential of transcritical cycles based on CO2 mixtures: An exergy-based analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1606-1628.
    21. Chen Yang & Zonglong Zhang & Haochuang Wu & Kangjie Deng, 2022. "Dynamic Characteristics Analysis of a 660 MW Ultra-Supercritical Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    22. Zhang, Zuxian & Duan, Liqiang & Wang, Zhen & Ren, Yujie, 2022. "General performance evaluation method of integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    23. Iglesias Garcia, Steven & Ferreiro Garcia, Ramon & Carbia Carril, Jose & Iglesias Garcia, Denis, 2018. "A review of thermodynamic cycles used in low temperature recovery systems over the last two years," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 760-767.
    24. Al-Momani, Ahmad & Mohamed, Omar & Abu Elhaija, Wejdan, 2022. "Multiple processes modeling and identification for a cleaner supercritical power plant via Grey Wolf Optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    25. Omar Mohamed & Ashraf Khalil & Jihong Wang, 2020. "Modeling and Control of Supercritical and Ultra-Supercritical Power Plants: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    26. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wahiba Yaïci & Andres Annuk & Evgueniy Entchev & Michela Longo & Janar Kalder, 2021. "Organic Rankine Cycle-Ground Source Heat Pump with Seasonal Energy Storage Based Micro-Cogeneration System in Cold Climates: The Case for Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Sanjay Mukherjee & Abhishek Asthana & Martin Howarth & Jahedul Islam Chowdhury, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Waste Heat Recovery Technologies for the Food Processing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Waqar Muhammad Ashraf & Ghulam Moeen Uddin & Syed Muhammad Arafat & Sher Afghan & Ahmad Hassan Kamal & Muhammad Asim & Muhammad Haider Khan & Muhammad Waqas Rafique & Uwe Naumann & Sajawal Gul Niazi &, 2020. "Optimization of a 660 MW e Supercritical Power Plant Performance—A Case of Industry 4.0 in the Data-Driven Operational Management Part 1. Thermal Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-33, October.
    4. Carraro, Gianluca & Bori, Viola & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Toniato, Giuseppe & Danieli, Piero, 2020. "Experimental investigation of an innovative biomass-fired micro-ORC system for cogeneration applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1226-1243.
    5. Mohan, Sooraj & Dinesha, P. & Campana, Pietro Elia, 2022. "ANN-PSO aided selection of hydrocarbons as working fluid for low-temperature organic Rankine cycle and thermodynamic evaluation of optimal working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Mohammad Qasem & Omar Mohamed & Wejdan Abu Elhaija, 2022. "Parameter Identification and Sliding Pressure Control of a Supercritical Power Plant Using Whale Optimizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Bianchi, M. & Branchini, L. & De Pascale, A. & Melino, F. & Ottaviano, S. & Peretto, A. & Torricelli, N., 2020. "Replacement of R134a with low-GWP fluids in a kW-size reciprocating piston expander: Performance prediction and design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    9. Moradi, Ramin & Cioccolanti, Luca & Del Zotto, Luca & Renzi, Massimiliano, 2023. "Comparative sensitivity analysis of micro-scale gas turbine and supercritical CO2 systems with bottoming organic Rankine cycles fed by the biomass gasification for decentralized trigeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    11. T. M. I. Mahlia & H. Syaheed & A. E. Pg Abas & F. Kusumo & A. H. Shamsuddin & Hwai Chyuan Ong & M. R. Bilad, 2019. "Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Applications for Solar Energy: Recent Technological Advances," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Escalante, Edwin Santiago Rios & Balestieri, José Antônio Perrella & de Carvalho, João Andrade, 2022. "The organic Rankine cycle: A promising technology for electricity generation and thermal pollution mitigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    13. Peris, Bernardo & Navarro-Esbrí, Joaquín & Mateu-Royo, Carlos & Mota-Babiloni, Adrián & Molés, Francisco & Gutiérrez-Trashorras, Antonio J. & Amat-Albuixech, Marta, 2020. "Thermo-economic optimization of small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle: A case study for low-grade industrial waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    16. Rafał Kowalski & Szymon Kuczyński & Mariusz Łaciak & Adam Szurlej & Tomasz Włodek, 2020. "A Case Study of the Supercritical CO 2 -Brayton Cycle at a Natural Gas Compression Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Alenezi, A. & Vesely, L. & Kapat, J., 2022. "Exergoeconomic analysis of hybrid sCO2 Brayton power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    18. Mascuch, Jakub & Novotny, Vaclav & Spale, Jan & Vodicka, Vaclav & Zeleny, Zbynek, 2021. "Experience from set-up and pilot operation of an in-house developed biomass-fired ORC microcogeneration unit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 251-260.
    19. Ancona, Maria Alessandra & Bianchi, Michele & Branchini, Lisa & De Pascale, Andrea & Melino, Francesco & Peretto, Antonio & Poletto, Chiara & Torricelli, Noemi, 2022. "Solar driven micro-ORC system assessment for residential application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 167-181.
    20. Bonalumi, Davide & Giuffrida, Antonio & Sicali, Federico, 2022. "Techno-economic investigations of supercritical CO2-based partial heating cycle as bottoming system of a small gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8982-:d:986294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.