IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i10p2447-d357570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study of the Supercritical CO 2 -Brayton Cycle at a Natural Gas Compression Station

Author

Listed:
  • Rafał Kowalski

    (Gas Engineering Department, Drilling, Oil and Gas Faculty, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Szymon Kuczyński

    (Gas Engineering Department, Drilling, Oil and Gas Faculty, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Mariusz Łaciak

    (Gas Engineering Department, Drilling, Oil and Gas Faculty, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Adam Szurlej

    (Gas Engineering Department, Drilling, Oil and Gas Faculty, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Tomasz Włodek

    (Gas Engineering Department, Drilling, Oil and Gas Faculty, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30 Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Heat losses caused by the operation of compressor units are a key problem in the energy efficiency improvement of the natural gas compression station operation. Currently, waste heat recovery technologies are expensive and have low efficiency. One of these technologies is organic Rankine cycle (ORC) which is often analyzed in scientific works. In this paper, the authors decided to investigate another technology that allows for the usage of the exhaust waste energy—the supercritical Brayton cycle with CO 2 (S-CO 2 ). With a thermodynamic model development of S-CO 2 , the authors preformed a case study of the potential S-CO 2 system at the gas compressor station with the reciprocating engines. By comparing the values of selected S-CO 2 efficiency indicators with ORC efficiency indicators at the same natural gas compression station, the authors tried to determine which technology would be better to use at the considered installation. Investigations on parameter change impacts on the system operation (e.g., turbine inlet pressure or exhaust gas cooling temperatures) allowed to determine the direction for further analysis of the S-CO 2 usage at the gas compressor station. When waste heat management is considered, priority should be given to its maximum recovery and cost-effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafał Kowalski & Szymon Kuczyński & Mariusz Łaciak & Adam Szurlej & Tomasz Włodek, 2020. "A Case Study of the Supercritical CO 2 -Brayton Cycle at a Natural Gas Compression Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:2447-:d:357570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2447/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2447/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Lin & Pan, Liang-ming & Wang, Junfeng & Chen, Deqi & Huang, Yanping & Hu, Lian, 2019. "Investigation on the temperature sensitivity of the S-CO2 Brayton cycle efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 739-750.
    2. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    3. Heo, Jin Young & Kim, Min Seok & Baik, Seungjoon & Bae, Seong Jun & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle using an isothermal compressor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1118-1130.
    4. Bianchi, M. & Branchini, L. & De Pascale, A. & Melino, F. & Peretto, A. & Archetti, D. & Campana, F. & Ferrari, T. & Rossetti, N., 2019. "Feasibility of ORC application in natural gas compressor stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Kim, Min Seok & Ahn, Yoonhan & Kim, Beomjoo & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2016. "Study on the supercritical CO2 power cycles for landfill gas firing gas turbine bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 893-909.
    6. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Hemin & Guo, Chaohong & Cai, Haofei & Jiang, Yuyan & Liang, Shiqiang & Guo, Yongxian, 2021. "Dynamic characteristics of the recuperator thermal performance in a S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Liya Ren & Huaixin Wang, 2020. "Optimization and Comparison of Two Combined Cycles Consisting of CO 2 and Organic Trans-Critical Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Kirmse, Christoph J.W. & Haslam, Andrew J. & Müller, Erich A. & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Working-fluid selection and performance investigation of a two-phase single-reciprocating-piston heat-conversion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 376-395.
    4. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    5. Steven Lecompte & Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Christos N. Markides & Marija Lazova & Alihan Kaya & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2017. "Case Study of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Waste Heat Recovery from an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Saeed, Muhammad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2018. "Analysis of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle with an integrated turbine design/optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 93-111.
    7. Fan, Gang & Lu, Xiaochen & Chen, Kang & Zhang, Yicen & Han, Zihao & Yu, Haibin & Dai, Yiping, 2022. "Comparative analysis on design and off-design performance of novel cascade CO2 combined cycles for gas turbine waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    8. Andrés Meana-Fernández & Juan M. González-Caballín & Roberto Martínez-Pérez & Francisco J. Rubio-Serrano & Antonio J. Gutiérrez-Trashorras, 2022. "Power Plant Cycles: Evolution towards More Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Alharbi, Sattam & Elsayed, Mohamed L. & Chow, Louis C., 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an integrated system of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and multi-effect desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib & Ahmed, Samer & Kapat, Jayanta, 2021. "Direct-fired oxy-combustion supercritical-CO2 power cycle with novel preheating configurations -thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    11. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A., 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis of two solid oxide fuel cell based cogeneration plants integrated with simple or modified supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    12. Tozlu, Alperen & Abuşoğlu, Ayşegül & Özahi, Emrah, 2018. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a Re-compression supercritical CO2 cycle using waste heat of Gaziantep Municipal Solid Waste Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 168-180.
    13. Faustino Moreno-Gamboa & Ana Escudero-Atehortua & César Nieto-Londoño, 2022. "Alternatives to Improve Performance and Operation of a Hybrid Solar Thermal Power Plant Using Hybrid Closed Brayton Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & Miller, Francisco M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2015. "Normalized performance optimization of supercritical, CO2-based power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 108-118.
    15. Bonalumi, Davide & Giuffrida, Antonio & Sicali, Federico, 2022. "Techno-economic investigations of supercritical CO2-based partial heating cycle as bottoming system of a small gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    16. Park, Joo Hyun & Park, Hyun Sun & Kwon, Jin Gyu & Kim, Tae Ho & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 520-535.
    17. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Penkuhn, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Systematic evaluation of efficiency improvement options for sCO2 Brayton cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    20. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:2447-:d:357570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.